plugins/clarify/skills/metamedium/SKILL.md
This skill should be used when the key question is whether to optimize content (what) or redesign form (how/medium). Trigger on "내용 vs 형식", "content vs form", "metamedium", "형식을 바꿔볼까", "새로운 포맷", "perspective shift", "diminishing returns". For requirement clarification use interview; for strategy blind spots use unknown.
npx skillsauth add october-academy/agent-plugins metamediumInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Distinguish content (what is produced) from form (the medium/structure that produces or delivers it) to decide where leverage is highest.
For requirement clarification, use interview. For strategy blind spots, use unknown.
Use this question when stuck:
What new form could make this recurring problem disappear?
Classify the user's current activities:
[CONTENT] direct outputs (doc, code change, campaign copy)[FORM] systems/pipelines/templates/tools enabling repeated outputsAsk user to choose one path using options (on Codex use request_user_input; with no structured-question tool, offer the same options as a numbered plain-text list):
If content:
Form Opportunity noteIf form:
If hybrid:
## Content/Form Analysis
**Current work**: [description]
**Classification**: [CONTENT / FORM]
### Form Opportunity
| Field | Detail |
|-------|--------|
| Alternative form | ... |
| New properties | ... |
| Minimum test | ... |
| Status | exploring / later / rejected |
references/alan-kay-quotes.mddevelopment
This skill should be used when the user's request or requirement is ambiguous and needs an iterative interview to become actionable — vague feature requests ("add notifications"), incomplete bug reports ("the export is broken"), underspecified tasks and migrations ("make it faster", "convert this to TypeScript"), or any build request the user hasn't fully thought through. Trigger on "clarify requirements", "refine requirements", "요구사항 명확히", "요구사항 정리", "요구사항 인터뷰", "인터뷰해줘", "interview me", "ask me questions before building", "make this clearer", "spec this out", "scope this", "/clarify:interview". Turns vague inputs into concrete specs and surfaces considerations the user hasn't thought of. For strategy blind spots use unknown; for content-vs-form reframing use metamedium.
data-ai
블로그 초안/최종 원고를 빠르게 보수 윤문하는 병렬 strict 워크플로. humanize-korean --strict의 검증 분리(fidelity, naturalness, 잔존 S1/S2 탐지)는 유지하면서 청크 병렬화로 속도를 줄인다. 트리거: "블로그 최종 윤문", "윤문 빠르게", "blog-humanize-fast", "humanize-korean strict 너무 느려", "병렬 strict 윤문", "AI 티 줄이되 의미는 건드리지 마", "최종 교열 후 윤문". 아닌 것(negative scope): 초안 대필·내용 추가/삭제·사실 수정이 아니다 — 문체·리듬·표현만 의미 불변으로 손본다. 라우팅: 새 글 집필은 blog-prep, 더 깊은 검증·낮은 등급 재검증이 필요하면 humanize-korean --strict, 맞춤법·오탈자만이면 직접 교정으로 보낸다.
tools
Reddit, HN, GitHub, RSS, npm, Bluesky, Mastodon, 한국 커뮤니티까지 어제~오늘 뜨는 빌더/AI/오픈소스 시그널을 수집하고 Threads 포스트용으로 큐레이션. GitHub는 gh CLI 우선, 없으면 공개 REST API로 폴백. '지금 뜨는 것'을 넓게 스캔해 후보를 뽑는 큐레이션 전용 스킬이다. 특정 주제를 다각도로 파고드는 심층 리서치는 이 스킬이 아니라 deep-research(다중 소스 fact-check 리포트)·last30days(한 주제의 최근 30일 여론) 영역이다. 트리거: '트렌드', '인기글', 'trend scout', '쓰레드 리서치', 'threads 소재', '오늘 뭐 올리지', '콘텐츠 소재', 'reddit 인기글', 'HN 인기글', '깃허브 트렌드', '오픈소스 소재', '해커뉴스', '트렌드 스카우트', 'github trending', 'what is hot on hacker news', 'open source radar', 'reddit trending', 'trending packages', 'daily tech digest', 'tech news today', 'developer trends'. /trend-scout로 실행.
tools
Commit and push in one step. Use when user says "/cp", "commit and push", "커밋하고 푸시", "커밋 푸시", "변경사항 올려줘", or wants to stage, commit, and push changes in a single action. Optionally accepts a commit message as argument. Not for creating, reviewing, or merging pull requests — commit and push only.