versioning-skills/SKILL.md
REQUIRED for all skill development. Automatically version control every skill file modification for rollback/comparison. Use after init_skill.sh, after every str_replace/create_file, and before packaging.
npx skillsauth add oaustegard/claude-skills versioning-skillsInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Use git to track changes during skill development. Initialize repos after creating skills, commit after each logical change, and use git commands to compare versions or revert mistakes.
After running init_skill.sh, immediately initialize git:
cd /home/claude/skill-name
git init
git add .
git commit -m "Initial commit: skill structure"
After each logical change (adding a section, fixing an example, refactoring), commit:
cd /home/claude/skill-name
git add .
git commit -m "Add: validation workflow pattern"
Commit message patterns:
"Add [feature]: description" - New functionality"Fix [issue]: description" - Bug fixes"Update [section]: description" - Content changes"Refactor [component]: description" - Structural changes"Remove [feature]: description" - DeletionsCRITICAL: Never display diffs inline - redirect to files and provide links.
ALSO CRITICAL: Only create diffs/changelogs when user explicitly asks "what changed?" or "show differences"
Don't preemptively create:
Why: The updated code/docs ARE the documentation. Creating separate changelogs wastes tokens and duplicates information.
When user asks, show commit history:
cd /home/claude/skill-name
git log --oneline
Save diff to file (prevents token waste):
cd /home/claude/skill-name
git diff <commit-hash-1> <commit-hash-2> > /mnt/user-data/outputs/changes.diff
Then provide: [View changes](computer:///mnt/user-data/outputs/changes.diff)
For multiple diffs:
# Changed files list
git diff --name-only <commit-1> <commit-2> > /mnt/user-data/outputs/changed-files.txt
# Full diff
git diff <commit-1> <commit-2> > /mnt/user-data/outputs/full-diff.diff
# Summary stats
git diff --stat <commit-1> <commit-2> > /mnt/user-data/outputs/diff-stats.txt
Wrong: git diff <commit-1> <commit-2> (displays in stdout, wastes tokens)
Right: git diff <commit-1> <commit-2> > /mnt/user-data/outputs/diff.txt (file + link)
Undo last commit (keep uncommitted changes):
cd /home/claude/skill-name
git reset --soft HEAD~1
Undo last commit (discard all changes):
git reset --hard HEAD~1
Revert specific commit (creates new commit, preserves history):
git revert <commit-hash>
Discard uncommitted edits (restore to last commit):
git restore .
Prefer git revert over git reset --hard to preserve history.
Create a branch before risky modifications:
cd /home/claude/skill-name
# Create and switch to experiment branch
git checkout -b experiment-new-approach
# Make changes, test
# ... edit files ...
git add .
git commit -m "Experiment: alternative validation"
# If successful, merge back
git checkout main
git merge experiment-new-approach
git branch -d experiment-new-approach
# If failed, abandon and return to main
git checkout main
git branch -D experiment-new-approach
If user uploads or provides two versions:
cd /home/claude
mkdir -p compare
# Extract both versions
unzip /mnt/user-data/uploads/skill-v1.zip -d compare/v1
unzip /mnt/user-data/uploads/skill-v2.zip -d compare/v2
# Initialize git in each
cd compare/v1 && git init && git add . && git commit -m "Version 1"
cd ../v2 && git init && git add . && git commit -m "Version 2"
# Compare
cd ../v1
git diff --no-index . ../v2
Or use diff directly without git:
diff -ur compare/v1 compare/v2
Before zipping, verify clean state:
cd /home/claude/skill-name
git status # Should show no uncommitted changes
git log --oneline # Review history
# Package (excludes .git automatically with -x)
cd /home/claude
zip -r /mnt/user-data/outputs/skill-name.zip skill-name/ -x "*.git*"
During skill creation:
git init && git add . && git commit -m "Initial structure"git add . && git commit -m "Add: core documentation"During skill editing:
git add <file> && git commit -m "Fix: corrected example"Before delivery:
git log --onelinegit statusSet git identity once per session to avoid prompts:
git config --global user.name "Claude"
git config --global user.email "[email protected]"
"not a git repository"
→ Run git init first
"nothing to commit"
→ No changes made, or forgot git add
Commit message editor opens
→ Always use -m "message" with commit
Commit after each logical change, not every keystroke. Use descriptive commit messages in present tense. Create branches for experimental changes. Use git log --oneline frequently to track progress.
Git repos in /home/claude reset between sessions. Version control only persists within a single development session. Network restrictions prevent push/pull to remote repos.
development
--- name: verifying-claims description: Check that a document's claims about code are actually true by reading the prose, the code, and the tests and reporting (or fixing) where they disagree. Use whenever the user wants to verify a README, guide, spec, or docstring still matches the code; whenever they mention documentation drift, doc-code sync, "is this still accurate", stale docs, or keeping docs/tests/code consistent; before publishing or merging a docs change; or as a periodic doc-accuracy
tools
Query, filter, and transform Markdown structurally with mq — a jq-like CLI for Markdown. Use to extract headings/sections/code-blocks/links from .md files, build a table of contents, pull code blocks of a given language, slice or reshape LLM prompt/output Markdown, or batch-transform docs. Triggers on "extract sections from this markdown", "get all the code blocks", "jq for markdown", "mq", or any structural query over Markdown that grep/Read can't do cleanly.
development
Composes single-file HTML artifacts (PR review writeups, status reports, incident postmortems, slide decks, design systems, prototypes, flowcharts, module maps, feature explainers, kanban boards, prompt tuners) from a small JSON spec instead of hand-written HTML/CSS/JS. Use when the user asks to "compare options side-by-side", requests an HTML version of a report or review or deck, asks for a flowchart, status update, postmortem, design system reference, interactive prototype, custom editor — or explicitly says "HTML artifact", "single HTML file", "self-contained HTML". Skip for ad-hoc HTML snippets (forms, emails, embedded widgets) where there's no template fit.
development
DAG workflow runner that encodes control flow in code, not prose. Use when a procedure has 3+ steps with branching, retries, or validation that must be enforced — gates as `when=`, edge contracts as `validate=`, predicate loops as `retry_until=`. The runner owns the graph; the LLM provides leaves. Also covers parallel execution, checkpoint resume, detached side-effects.