plugins/nw/skills/nw-sd-case-studies/SKILL.md
25 real-world system design case studies condensed from Alex Xu's System Design Interview Vol 1 and 2 - requirements, architecture, deep dive insights, key takeaways
npx skillsauth add nwave-ai/nwave nw-sd-case-studiesInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Reference catalog of 25 real-world designs. Use when designing a similar system or needing precedent for architectural decisions.
Scale: API gateway middleware | Core: Token Bucket (industry standard) or Sliding Window Counter | Storage: Redis counters with TTL | Distributed: Lua scripts for atomic increment | Key insight: cross-cutting concern, belongs in middleware/gateway | Headers: 429 + Retry-After + X-RateLimit-Remaining
Core: hash ring 0 to 2^32-1, servers at positions, keys walk clockwise | Virtual nodes: 100-200 per server, reduces load deviation from ~40% to ~5% | Used in: DynamoDB, Cassandra, Akamai, Discord | Key insight: never deploy without virtual nodes
Core: consistent hashing for partitioning, N replicas on clockwise nodes, quorum W+R>N | Conflict: vector clocks, LWW, app-level merge | Failures: sloppy quorum + hinted handoff (temp), Merkle trees + anti-entropy (permanent), gossip for detection | Write path: WAL -> memtable -> SSTable (LSM-tree) | Read path: memtable -> Bloom filter -> SSTable(s)
Winner: Snowflake -- 64-bit, sortable, minimal coordination | [1 unused | 41 timestamp | 5 DC | 5 machine | 12 sequence] ~4M IDs/sec/DC | Weakness: clock sync (NTP) | Alt: UUID (128-bit, not sortable), ticket server (SPOF)
Scale: 100M/day ~ 1,160 QPS write, 11,600 read | Short URL: base62 with 7 chars = 3.5T combinations | Approaches: hash + collision resolution | base62 from auto-increment ID | pre-generated key service | Redirect: 301 (cached, no analytics) vs 302 (every click tracked) -- most use 302 | Key: caching critical (heavy-tailed distribution)
Scale: 1B pages/month ~ 400 pages/sec, 500TB storage/month | Core: URL Frontier with priority queues (importance) + politeness queues (per-domain rate limit) | Dedup: SHA-256 exact, simhash/MinHash near-duplicate | Traps: URL length limit, max depth, blacklist | Key insight: URL frontier is the most important component
Scale: 10M push, 1M SMS, 5M email/day | Architecture: Services -> Message Queue -> Workers -> Third-party (APNs, FCM, Twilio, SES) | Reliability: persist before sending, retry with exponential backoff, dedup via event_id | Key: decouple creation from delivery; user preferences are critical
Core: hybrid fan-out -- push for normal users (<10K followers), pull for celebrities | Feed cache: pre-computed for most users, celebrity posts merged at read time | Ranking: chronological simplest; ML-based for engagement optimization | Pagination: cursor-based (not offset) | Media: object storage + CDN
Scale: 50M DAU | Protocol: WebSocket (bidirectional, persistent) | Storage: KV store (HBase-like), partition by channel_id | 1-on-1: message via WebSocket -> store -> push to recipient (or notification if offline) | Group (<100): fan-out on write to member inboxes | Presence: heartbeat every 5s, offline after 30s missed, lazy propagation for large friend lists | Multi-device: per-device cursor of last-read message
Scale: 24K QPS avg, 48K peak | Core: trie with cached top-K at each node, O(prefix_length) query | Update: offline aggregation (weekly rebuild), NOT real-time; separate trending pipeline | Scaling: shard by first character(s), replicate each shard | Client: debounce 100-200ms, cache recent results, pre-fetch
Scale: 5M DAU, 150TB storage/day | Upload: upload -> transcoding queue -> workers (DAG pipeline: split->encode->merge) -> object storage -> CDN | Streaming: adaptive bitrate (DASH/HLS), manifest + segment-based | Transcoding: multiple resolutions (360p-4K) + formats (H.264, VP9, AV1) | Cost: popular videos on CDN, long-tail from origin; encode popular formats eagerly
Scale: 50M users, 500PB total | Core optimization: block-level sync -- split files into ~4MB blocks, detect changed blocks (delta sync), upload only changed | Notification: long polling for sync events | Dedup: same block hash = same storage across users | Versioning: store block lists per version, not full copies | Conflict: first upload wins, second gets notification, user resolves
Scale: 100M DAU, 200M businesses | Core: geospatial indexing -- geohash (string prefix queries, DB-friendly) or quadtree (adaptive density, in-memory ~1.7GB) | Boundary problem: geohash neighbors may have different prefixes -- query target + 8 neighbors | Architecture: separate LBS (read-heavy, stateless) from Business Service (CRUD)
Scale: 10M concurrent, 334K location updates/sec | Core: Pub/Sub with geohash-based channels (not per-user -- too many) | Connection: WebSocket (bidirectional, persistent) | Location cache: Redis with TTL 60s | Optimization: subscribe to own geohash cell + 8 neighbors; resubscribe on cell change
Map rendering: pre-rendered tile pyramid (zoom N = 4^N tiles), served via CDN | Tile addressing: /tiles/{zoom}/{x}/{y}.png | Routing: hierarchical graph (local -> regional -> interstate), not naive Dijkstra -- Contraction Hierarchies | ETA: base distance/speed + real-time traffic + historical patterns + ML | Traffic: crowdsourced GPS traces, aggregated per road segment
Core: topics divided into partitions (unit of parallelism + ordering) | Storage: append-only log segments, sequential I/O, zero-copy, batching | Producer: partition via round-robin/key-hash, ack modes (0/1/all) | Consumer groups: each partition to one consumer in group, offset tracking | Replication: leader + ISR followers, elect from ISR on failure | Why fast: sequential writes (~600MB/s), zero-copy, page cache, batching
Data model: (metric_name, tags, timestamp, value) | TSDB: specialized for high write throughput + time-range queries | Compression: delta-of-delta timestamps, XOR values (Gorilla) | Storage tiering: hot (raw, memory) -> warm (1-min aggregates) -> cold (1-hour aggregates) | Ingestion: pull (Prometheus) or push (Datadog), buffer with Kafka | Alerting: rules against TSDB, dedup, escalation
Scale: 1B clicks/day, 10K-50K QPS | Architecture: Kafka -> Flink (stream) -> Aggregation DB + Reconciliation (batch) | Windows: tumbling (1-min for billing) or sliding (rolling) | Exactly-once: Kafka transactions + Flink checkpointing | Late events: watermarks with trade-off (longer delay = more accuracy) | Reconciliation: batch corrects stream inaccuracies for billing
Scale: low QPS (~35), HIGH correctness | Core challenge: concurrency control, not scale | Solution: optimistic locking + DB constraint: UPDATE WHERE version=? AND reserved < total | Flow: select -> PENDING -> payment -> CONFIRMED/CANCELLED, 10-min timeout | Idempotency: client-generated key prevents double-booking | Overbooking: business decision (~110%), built into model
Scale: 1B users, 460K receive QPS, ~10 EB storage | Architecture: SMTP for send/receive, separate metadata (relational/wide-column) from body/attachments (blob) | Labels: Gmail-style (not folders), email can have multiple | Search: Elasticsearch, indexed async, per-user scope | Sync: push-then-pull (notification triggers device pull), per-device cursor | Anti-spam: ML + sender reputation + SPF/DKIM/DMARC + rate limiting
Scale: 100 PB, 11 nines durability | Architecture: API Service + Metadata Service + Data Service (separate metadata from data) | Durability: replication + erasure coding + checksums + cross-AZ + self-healing | Write: replicate data first, then commit metadata | Versioning: version chain in metadata, each PUT = new version, soft delete | Listing: prefix queries on flat namespace with '/' convention
Scale: 250M score updates/day ~ 2,900 QPS | Solution: Redis Sorted Set (ZADD, ZREVRANGE, ZREVRANK -- all O(log N), sub-ms) | Why Redis: purpose-built data structure, correct complexity, single instance handles millions | Periodic: separate sorted set per period (leaderboard:2024-01-15) | Scaling: single Redis sufficient for most cases; shard by score range for billions
Scale: 12 TPS (LOW throughput, HIGH reliability) | Core: idempotency key per payment (non-negotiable) | Flow: receive -> PENDING -> call PSP -> SUCCESS/FAILED + webhook confirmation | Ledger: double-entry (every tx = debit + credit, SUM(debits) = SUM(credits)) | Reconciliation: nightly batch compare internal ledger vs PSP settlement | Failures: retry with same idempotency key, event sourcing for replay
Core challenge: distributed transactions (debit A + credit B must be atomic) | Approach 1: single DB with ACID (simple, limited scale) | Approach 2: event sourcing (immutable events, balance = sum, perfect audit) | Approach 3: CQRS + event sourcing (write: append events, read: materialized balance) | Cross-shard: Saga (debit then credit, compensate on failure) or TCC (try-confirm/cancel) | Key: balance derived from transaction history, not stored independently
Scale: microsecond latency, millions of orders/day | Architecture: Gateway -> Sequencer -> Matching Engine -> Execution Reports | Sequencer: single-threaded, monotonic sequence numbers, deterministic processing | Order book: per-symbol, buy max-heap + sell min-heap, FIFO at each price level | Latency: single-threaded (no locks), pre-allocated memory (no GC), kernel bypass (DPDK) | Recovery: replay from sequencer log (deterministic = same sequence -> same state)
testing
Acceptance test creation methodology for the DISTILL wave. Domain knowledge for the acceptance designer agent: port-to-port principle, prior wave reading, wave-decision reconciliation, graceful degradation, and document back-propagation.
development
Cross-agent collaboration protocols, workflow handoff patterns, and commit message formats for TDD/Mikado/refactoring workflows
development
Creates a phased roadmap.json for a feature goal with acceptance criteria and TDD steps. Use when planning implementation steps before execution.
testing
Acceptance test creation methodology for the DISTILL wave. Domain knowledge for the acceptance designer agent: port-to-port principle, prior wave reading, wave-decision reconciliation, graceful degradation, and document back-propagation.