nWave/skills/nw-opportunity-mapping/SKILL.md
Opportunity Solution Trees, opportunity scoring, Lean Canvas, JTBD job mapping, and technique selection guide
npx skillsauth add nwave-ai/nwave nw-opportunity-mappingInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Connects desired outcomes to opportunities to solution ideas:
Desired Outcome
|
+-- Opportunity 1 (score)
| +-- Solution Idea A
| +-- Solution Idea B
|
+-- Opportunity 2 (score)
| +-- Solution Idea C
|
+-- Opportunity 3 (score)
+-- Solution Idea D
+-- Solution Idea E
Formula: Score = Importance + Max(0, Importance - Satisfaction) Importance: 1-10 | Satisfaction: 1-10 | Max score: 20
| Score | Meaning | Action | |-------|---------|--------| | >8 | High importance, satisfaction gap -- underserved | Pursue | | 5-8 | Moderate importance or partially served | Evaluate | | <5 | Low importance or well-served | Deprioritize |
Process: gather importance + satisfaction from 5+ interviews, calculate per opportunity, rank, select top 2-3.
| Step | Goal | Outcome Format | |------|------|---------------| | Define | Determine what needs doing | Minimize time to identify [object] | | Locate | Find inputs/information | Minimize time to gather [resources] | | Prepare | Ready inputs for use | Minimize likelihood of missing [requirements] | | Confirm | Verify readiness | Minimize likelihood of incorrect [categorization] | | Execute | Perform core task | Minimize time from [start] to [completion] | | Monitor | Track progress | Minimize uncertainty about [status] | | Modify | Adjust if needed | Minimize effort to correct [issues] | | Conclude | Complete the job | Minimize time from [completion] to [result] |
Outcome statement format: [Direction] + [Metric] + [Object] + [Clarifier] Example: "Minimize the time it takes to identify which project budget a new expense should be allocated to"
One-page business model for Phase 4 viability validation.
| Risk | Question | Validation | |------|----------|-----------| | Value | Will customers want this? | Interviews, fake doors | | Usability | Can customers use this? | Prototype testing, task completion | | Feasibility | Can we build this? | Spikes, expert review | | Viability | Business model works? | Lean Canvas, stakeholder review |
| Goal | Techniques | |------|-----------| | Validate problem | Mom Test, Job Mapping | | Understand needs | Outcome Statements, Opportunity Mapping | | Prioritize opportunities | OST, Opportunity Algorithm | | Generate solutions | Ideation with OST constraints | | Validate solution value | Hypothesis Testing, Prototypes | | Test usability | Prototype testing, Task completion | | Assess feasibility | 4 Risks, Spikes | | Structure business model | Lean Canvas | | Continuous learning | Weekly customer touchpoints |
testing
Runs feature-scoped mutation testing to validate test suite quality. Use after implementation to verify tests catch real bugs (kill rate >= 80%).
development
Canonical AT completeness gate — research-anchored 7-category taxonomy (C1-C7) + 15-item mechanical checklist. Paradigm-neutral. Drives acceptance-designer reviewer verdict deterministically.
development
Canonical AT completeness gate — research-anchored 7-category taxonomy (C1-C7) + 15-item mechanical checklist. Paradigm-neutral. Drives acceptance-designer reviewer verdict deterministically.
testing
Methodology for minimizing test count while maximizing behavioral coverage - behavior definition, anti-pattern catalog, consolidation patterns, stopping criterion, coverage-preserving validation