artifacts/bundle/skills/marketing-skill/social-media-analyzer/SKILL.md
# Social Media Analyzer Campaign performance analysis with engagement metrics, ROI calculations, and platform benchmarks. --- ## Table of Contents - [Analysis Workflow](#analysis-workflow) - [Engagement Metrics](#engagement-metrics) - [ROI Calculation](#roi-calculation) - [Platform Benchmarks](#platform-benchmarks) - [Tools](#tools) - [Examples](#examples) --- ## Analysis Workflow Analyze social media campaign performance: 1. Validate input data completeness (reach > 0, dates valid) 2. C
npx skillsauth add neekware/ehayeskills artifacts/bundle/skills/marketing-skill/social-media-analyzerInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Campaign performance analysis with engagement metrics, ROI calculations, and platform benchmarks.
Analyze social media campaign performance:
| Field | Required | Description | | ------------------- | -------- | ---------------------------------------------- | | platform | Yes | instagram, facebook, twitter, linkedin, tiktok | | posts[] | Yes | Array of post data | | posts[].likes | Yes | Like/reaction count | | posts[].comments | Yes | Comment count | | posts[].reach | Yes | Unique users reached | | posts[].impressions | No | Total views | | posts[].shares | No | Share/retweet count | | posts[].saves | No | Save/bookmark count | | posts[].clicks | No | Link clicks | | total_spend | No | Ad spend (for ROI) |
Before analysis, verify:
Engagement Rate = (Likes + Comments + Shares + Saves) / Reach × 100
| Metric | Formula | Interpretation | | --------------- | -------------------------- | -------------------------- | | Engagement Rate | Engagements / Reach × 100 | Audience interaction level | | CTR | Clicks / Impressions × 100 | Content click appeal | | Reach Rate | Reach / Followers × 100 | Content distribution | | Virality Rate | Shares / Impressions × 100 | Share-worthiness | | Save Rate | Saves / Reach × 100 | Content value |
| Rating | Engagement Rate | Action | | --------- | --------------- | ------------------- | | Excellent | > 6% | Scale and replicate | | Good | 3-6% | Optimize and expand | | Average | 1-3% | Test improvements | | Poor | < 1% | Analyze and pivot |
Calculate return on ad spend:
| Metric | Formula | | ------------------------- | ------------------------------- | | Cost Per Engagement (CPE) | Total Spend / Total Engagements | | Cost Per Click (CPC) | Total Spend / Total Clicks | | Cost Per Thousand (CPM) | (Spend / Impressions) × 1000 | | Return on Ad Spend (ROAS) | Revenue / Ad Spend |
| Action | Value | Rationale | | ------- | ----- | ----------------- | | Like | $0.50 | Brand awareness | | Comment | $2.00 | Active engagement | | Share | $5.00 | Amplification | | Save | $3.00 | Intent signal | | Click | $1.50 | Traffic value |
| ROI % | Rating | Recommendation | | -------- | ---------- | ----------------------------- | | > 500% | Excellent | Scale budget significantly | | 200-500% | Good | Increase budget moderately | | 100-200% | Acceptable | Optimize before scaling | | 0-100% | Break-even | Review targeting and creative | | < 0% | Negative | Pause and restructure |
| Platform | Average | Good | Excellent | | --------- | ------- | -------- | --------- | | Instagram | 1.22% | 3-6% | >6% | | Facebook | 0.07% | 0.5-1% | >1% | | Twitter/X | 0.05% | 0.1-0.5% | >0.5% | | LinkedIn | 2.0% | 3-5% | >5% | | TikTok | 5.96% | 8-15% | >15% |
| Platform | Average | Good | Excellent | | --------- | ------- | -------- | --------- | | Instagram | 0.22% | 0.5-1% | >1% | | Facebook | 0.90% | 1.5-2.5% | >2.5% | | LinkedIn | 0.44% | 1-2% | >2% | | TikTok | 0.30% | 0.5-1% | >1% |
| Platform | Average | Good | | --------- | ------- | ------ | | Facebook | $0.97 | <$0.50 | | Instagram | $1.20 | <$0.70 | | LinkedIn | $5.26 | <$3.00 | | TikTok | $1.00 | <$0.50 |
See references/platform-benchmarks.md for complete benchmark data.
python scripts/calculate_metrics.py assets/sample_input.json
Calculates engagement rate, CTR, reach rate for each post and campaign totals.
python scripts/analyze_performance.py assets/sample_input.json
Generates full performance analysis with ROI, benchmarks, and recommendations.
Output includes:
See assets/sample_input.json:
{
"platform": "instagram",
"total_spend": 500,
"posts": [
{
"post_id": "post_001",
"content_type": "image",
"likes": 342,
"comments": 28,
"shares": 15,
"saves": 45,
"reach": 5200,
"impressions": 8500,
"clicks": 120
}
]
}
See assets/expected_output.json:
{
"campaign_metrics": {
"total_engagements": 1521,
"avg_engagement_rate": 8.36,
"ctr": 1.55
},
"roi_metrics": {
"total_spend": 500.0,
"cost_per_engagement": 0.33,
"roi_percentage": 660.5
},
"insights": {
"overall_health": "excellent",
"benchmark_comparison": {
"engagement_status": "excellent",
"engagement_benchmark": "1.22%",
"engagement_actual": "8.36%"
}
}
}
The sample campaign shows:
references/platform-benchmarks.md contains:
| When you ask for... | You get... | | ---------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------ | | "Social media audit" | Performance analysis across platforms with benchmarks | | "What's performing?" | Top content analysis with patterns and recommendations | | "Competitor social analysis" | Competitive social media comparison with gaps |
All output passes quality verification:
Creator: Marketing Skill License: MIT Source Repo:
neekware/ehaye-skillsSource Bucket:marketing-skillOriginal Path:marketing-skill/social-media-analyzer
tools
# ehAye Multimedia Use this skill for **video, audio, images, media conversion, previews, transcription, thumbnails, frame extraction, Spotter visual search, or FFmpeg-backed processing**. Core rule: use ehAye native media tools first. Do not reach first for shell `ffmpeg`, `ffprobe`, Python, or `mediainfo` when a native media tool can do the job. Native tools use bundled engines, show proper tool UI, respect cancellation/timeouts, integrate with Preview/Spotter, and avoid cross-platform shell
development
Test-driven development skill for writing unit tests, generating test fixtures and mocks, analyzing coverage gaps, and guiding red-green-refactor workflows across Jest, Pytest, JUnit, Vitest, and Mocha. Use when the user asks to write tests, improve test coverage, practice TDD, generate mocks or stubs, or mentions testing frameworks like Jest, pytest, or JUnit. Handles test generation from source code, coverage report parsing (LCOV/JSON/XML), quality scoring, and framework conversion for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, and Java projects.
tools
Help a user set up Telegram for ehAye Dojo. Default to Personal private bots (recommended). Group setup is advanced for teams/observers/demos.
development
# Writing Skills ## Overview **Writing skills IS Test-Driven Development applied to process documentation.** **Personal skills live in agent-specific directories (`~/.claude/skills` for Claude Code, `~/.agents/skills/` for Codex)** You write test cases (pressure scenarios with subagents), watch them fail (baseline behavior), write the skill (documentation), watch tests pass (agents comply), and refactor (close loopholes). **Core principle:** If you didn't watch an agent fail without the ski