skills/slides-visuals/creating-slide-decks/SKILL.md
Create or revise complete Marp/Marpit slide decks, coordinating narrative, slide authoring, color systems, and Mermaid or SVG visuals with rendered validation.
npx skillsauth add narumiruna/agent-skills creating-slide-decksInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Produce a coherent Marp deck, not a collection of independently styled slides. Use focused skills for detailed authoring, color, and illustration rules.
| Need | Skill |
| --- | --- |
| Marp syntax, layouts, themes, templates, validation | authoring-marp-slides |
| New or adapted slide palette | designing-slide-colors |
| Standard structured diagram with editable text source | creating-mermaid-diagrams |
| Bespoke illustration, exact visual layout, or direct SVG | creating-svg-illustrations |
Load only the skills needed for the requested deck. Use references/troubleshooting-common.md only when a cross-cutting problem appears.
authoring-marp-slides. Use one spacing unit and a consistent title/section/body hierarchy. Keep one primary visual anchor per section and use layout, type, spacing, and contrast before decoration.development
Score or compare one or more agent skills across trigger clarity, workflow actionability, safety boundaries, verification rigor, incremental knowledge value, and leanness. Use only when the user explicitly asks for ratings, numerical quality scores, rubric-based scorecards, or scored comparisons; use creating-agent-skills for unscored reviews or revisions.
development
Assess or improve an existing codebase's architecture when the user asks about module boundaries, coupling, scattered ownership, testability, change locality, deep modules, seams, or behavior-preserving structural refactoring. Use for cross-module design rather than ordinary diff review or a confirmed edge-case bug fix.
development
Perform read-only security audits, vulnerability assessments, or threat-focused reviews of diffs, pull requests, code paths, or explicitly scoped repositories when security is the primary objective or acceptance criterion. Use reviewing-code for ordinary review with baseline security coverage and hardening-code-paths for fixing confirmed findings.
development
Run iterative multi-reviewer panels over a code diff, verify their findings, apply explicitly authorized fixes, and re-review the updated change until it passes or reaches a stopping condition. Use when the user asks for a panel loop, multi-model code-review consensus, or a review-fix-re-review cycle.