deprecated/building-codex-hooks/SKILL.md
Design, implement, review, or debug the deprecated repository reference for Codex CLI hooks, including hooks.json layers, event matchers, stdin/stdout contracts, and hook scripts. Verify current Codex documentation before relying on version-sensitive behavior.
npx skillsauth add narumiruna/agent-skills building-codex-hooksInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Treat bundled runtime details as historical until checked against the installed Codex version and current official documentation. Hooks are workflow guardrails, not a security boundary.
cwd.Read references/events.md for the recorded event matrix and references/examples.md for minimal historical examples, but reverify every field and output shape before implementation.
Report the runtime/docs version checked, config layer, event and matcher, handler artifact, contract tests, and any unsupported or fail-open path. Do not publish, install user-global hooks, or enable repository policy externally unless requested.
development
Score or compare one or more agent skills across trigger clarity, workflow actionability, safety boundaries, verification rigor, incremental knowledge value, and leanness. Use only when the user explicitly asks for ratings, numerical quality scores, rubric-based scorecards, or scored comparisons; use creating-agent-skills for unscored reviews or revisions.
development
Assess or improve an existing codebase's architecture when the user asks about module boundaries, coupling, scattered ownership, testability, change locality, deep modules, seams, or behavior-preserving structural refactoring. Use for cross-module design rather than ordinary diff review or a confirmed edge-case bug fix.
development
Perform read-only security audits, vulnerability assessments, or threat-focused reviews of diffs, pull requests, code paths, or explicitly scoped repositories when security is the primary objective or acceptance criterion. Use reviewing-code for ordinary review with baseline security coverage and hardening-code-paths for fixing confirmed findings.
development
Run iterative multi-reviewer panels over a code diff, verify their findings, apply explicitly authorized fixes, and re-review the updated change until it passes or reaches a stopping condition. Use when the user asks for a panel loop, multi-model code-review consensus, or a review-fix-re-review cycle.