code/post-ticket-summary/SKILL.md
Posts a structured implementation summary comment to a Linear issue — what was built, key decisions, reuse patterns, and how to test. Use after completing work on a ticket to document the implementation for the team.
npx skillsauth add mostafa-drz/claude-skills post-ticket-summaryInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Add a structured implementation summary comment to a Linear issue after completing work.
Read ~/.claude/skills/post-ticket-summary/preferences.md using the Read tool. If not found, no preferences are set.
On startup, use Bash to detect: current git branch, recent commits (git log --oneline -20), and repo name (gh repo view --json nameWithOwner -q .nameWithOwner). Skip any that fail.
Check $ARGUMENTS:
help → display help then stopconfig → interactive setup then stopreset → delete ~/.claude/skills/post-ticket-summary/preferences.md, confirm, stop--preview <issue-id> → show comment without posting then stop--minimal <issue-id> → use minimal templatePost Summary — Document implementation on a Linear issue
Usage:
/post-ticket-summary <issue-id> Post full summary
/post-ticket-summary --preview <issue-id> Show without posting
/post-ticket-summary --minimal <issue-id> Short summary (skip architecture/reuse)
/post-ticket-summary config Set template preferences
/post-ticket-summary reset Clear preferences
/post-ticket-summary help This help
Examples:
/post-ticket-summary AIS-810
/post-ticket-summary --preview AIS-810
/post-ticket-summary --minimal AIS-810
What it does:
1. Reads the Linear issue and codebase
2. Analyzes recent commits and changed files
3. Builds structured summary comment
4. Posts to the Linear issue
Current preferences:
(shown above under Preferences)
Use AskUserQuestion:
Q1 — "Default template?" (full (default), minimal) Q2 — "Which sections to include?" (multiSelect: true)
Q3 — "Auto-detect issue from branch?" (Yes (default), No — always ask)
Save to ~/.claude/skills/post-ticket-summary/preferences.md.
If no preferences file exists, show:
"First time using /post-ticket-summary? Run /post-ticket-summary config to customize template sections, or continue with full template."
Then proceed.
$ARGUMENTS, use ituser/ais-NNN-*)AskUserQuestionFetch the issue: title, description, project, status.
Fetch comments on the issue. If an implementation summary comment already exists, ask: "An implementation summary already exists. Replace it, or skip?"
From the codebase:
git diff main...HEAD --stat (or appropriate base)From project context:
Ask user (optional — use AskUserQuestion with all optional):
If user says "skip", use placeholders.
Full template:
## Implementation Summary
{1-2 paragraphs: what was built and the product goal. Focus on business value.}
### What Was Reused
| Component | Source | Adaptation |
|-----------|--------|------------|
| {component} | {origin} | {what changed} |
---
## How to Test
**Branch:** `{branch}`
**Live URL:** {url or N/A}
### Steps
1. {step}
2. {step}
3. {step}
---
## Features
### 1. {Feature Name}
{2-3 sentences from user perspective. What they see, what they can do, business value.}
### 2. {Feature Name}
{Same structure}
---
## Key Decisions
| Decision | Rationale |
|----------|-----------|
| {decision} | {why} |
---
## Notes
- {Additional context}
Minimal template:
## Implementation Summary
{1-2 paragraphs}
## How to Test
**Branch:** `{branch}`
1. {step}
2. {step}
## Notes
- {anything important}
Apply section toggles from preferences.
If --preview: display the comment and stop.
Otherwise: post via create_comment.
Posted implementation summary to {issue-id}.
Sections: {list of included sections}
Next steps:
1. Record Loom and update the link
2. Add screenshots if relevant
3. Replace any [PLACEHOLDER] markers
If user removes sections consistently, update preferences. If user adds custom sections, note the pattern.
development
--- name: triage-board description: >- Generates a structured triage artifact from the current conversation's findings — a self-contained Desktop folder with a JSON Schema, schema-conformant report.json, prose markdown, and a single-file HTML viewer. Viewer ships with MD / CSV / JSON download buttons in the header and a per-finding "Copy as Markdown" action that produces a GitHub/Linear/Notion-ready ticket block. Stateless — triage state lives in the user's ticket system, not in the
development
Runs a beginner-mind end-to-end UI audit of any running app — local dev server, staging, production, or a specific URL. Drives Chrome through every interactive element on the target surface, collects structured findings (severity, category, where, symptom, impact, repro, triage), and hands the result off to `/triage-board` which produces the Desktop folder (schema + JSON + Markdown + single-file HTML viewer with MD/CSV/JSON exports and a per-finding Copy as Markdown button). Use when you want fresh-eyes verification of a feature, page, modal, flow, branch, or whole app — before shipping, before review, before a demo, or any time the UI deserves a careful poke.
development
Reviews the user's past Claude Code conversations from a wellbeing perspective — sentiment, tone, emotional arc, recurring patterns — and generates a supportive, science-grounded report in both Markdown and HTML. Default lookback is 48 hours across all projects. Uses recognised emotion frameworks (Plutchik, Ekman, Russell's circumplex, Pennebaker linguistic markers) and cites the science behind every observation. Learns the user's baseline tone over time so future reports flag genuine shifts, not noise. Use when the user asks for an emotional/wellbeing recap, mood check, sentiment review, or wants to understand their own ups and downs across recent work sessions.
development
--- name: workflow-advisor description: >- Analyzes recent Claude Code conversations and local Claude state (skills, settings, memory files, CLAUDE.md), researches the latest Claude Code features and best practices online, and suggests one workflow improvement at a time with reasoning and a concrete action item. Can save accepted suggestions to memory for tracking. Use when you want to discover underused Claude Code features, improve your development workflow, stay current with the lat