code/next-steps/SKILL.md
Generate a stakeholder-aligned next-steps checklist for a multi-stakeholder project from the current conversation and connected context. Use when the user has just had a working session and now needs to align teammates (PM, design, engineering, leadership) on what happens next, who owns it, and what's blocked. Output is grouped by owner, prioritised, and pasteable into Slack/Notion/Linear.
npx skillsauth add mostafa-drz/claude-skills next-stepsInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Reads the current conversation (and optional connected context: Linear, Slack thread, Notion doc, git/PR state) and produces one consolidated checklist of next steps grouped by owner, ranked by priority, with explicit dependencies and open questions. Designed to be pasted into a Slack thread, a Linear comment, or a Notion update so everyone sees the same picture.
The point isn't to enumerate every possible task — it's to surface what unblocks the next move forward, so multiple stakeholders can self-serve.
Do NOT use this for: timesheet recaps (use /workday-summary), retrospective
status posts (use /project-updates), or commit-by-commit breakdowns.
Required:
Optional (from the scope-hint arg or follow-up questions):
ENG-1234) — fetch via mcp__linear-server__get_issue to anchor scope and check current state/assignee.#822) — fetch via gh pr view for state, reviewers, blocking checks.If the conversation already contains these references (it usually does), pull them automatically. Only ask the user when scope is genuinely ambiguous.
Identify, in one sentence, what project / piece of work this is for. Pull it from the conversation. If multiple candidates exist, ask the user which one.
List every named person and role that has appeared in the conversation or in referenced tickets/threads. Mark each as one of:
Don't invent stakeholders. Use names actually mentioned.
Walk the conversation and any fetched docs. For each item, capture:
P0 (blocks demo / today), P1 (this week), P2 (next pass)Apply ranking ruthlessly: an item that unblocks another stakeholder outranks an item that's purely internal polish.
Anything that's a decision needed — not a task — goes into a separate Open questions section, attributed to the decider. These are the things that, once answered, generate concrete tasks. Don't merge them with action items.
# Next steps — {project / scope}
## {Owner name or @handle}
- [ ] **P0** — {action}. _{context, source}_
- [ ] **P1** — {action}. _Blocked on: {dep}_
## {Next owner}
- [ ] **P1** — {action}.
## Open questions
- **{Decider}**: {question}. _Why it matters: {one clause}_
## Out of scope (parking lot)
- {item} — revisit when {trigger}
Hard rules:
Show the rendered checklist in chat. Ask:
Iterate once, then offer:
pbcopy) for Slack/Notion paste~/Desktop/next-steps-{slug}.md) for sharingdevelopment
--- name: triage-board description: >- Generates a structured triage artifact from the current conversation's findings — a self-contained Desktop folder with a JSON Schema, schema-conformant report.json, prose markdown, and a single-file HTML viewer. Viewer ships with MD / CSV / JSON download buttons in the header and a per-finding "Copy as Markdown" action that produces a GitHub/Linear/Notion-ready ticket block. Stateless — triage state lives in the user's ticket system, not in the
development
Runs a beginner-mind end-to-end UI audit of any running app — local dev server, staging, production, or a specific URL. Drives Chrome through every interactive element on the target surface, collects structured findings (severity, category, where, symptom, impact, repro, triage), and hands the result off to `/triage-board` which produces the Desktop folder (schema + JSON + Markdown + single-file HTML viewer with MD/CSV/JSON exports and a per-finding Copy as Markdown button). Use when you want fresh-eyes verification of a feature, page, modal, flow, branch, or whole app — before shipping, before review, before a demo, or any time the UI deserves a careful poke.
development
Reviews the user's past Claude Code conversations from a wellbeing perspective — sentiment, tone, emotional arc, recurring patterns — and generates a supportive, science-grounded report in both Markdown and HTML. Default lookback is 48 hours across all projects. Uses recognised emotion frameworks (Plutchik, Ekman, Russell's circumplex, Pennebaker linguistic markers) and cites the science behind every observation. Learns the user's baseline tone over time so future reports flag genuine shifts, not noise. Use when the user asks for an emotional/wellbeing recap, mood check, sentiment review, or wants to understand their own ups and downs across recent work sessions.
development
--- name: workflow-advisor description: >- Analyzes recent Claude Code conversations and local Claude state (skills, settings, memory files, CLAUDE.md), researches the latest Claude Code features and best practices online, and suggests one workflow improvement at a time with reasoning and a concrete action item. Can save accepted suggestions to memory for tracking. Use when you want to discover underused Claude Code features, improve your development workflow, stay current with the lat