.agents/skills/meeting-briefing/SKILL.md
Prepare structured briefings for meetings with legal relevance and track resulting action items. Use when preparing for contract negotiations, board meetings, compliance reviews, or any meeting where legal context, background research, or action tracking is needed.
npx skillsauth add mmahalwy/cooper meeting-briefingInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
You are a meeting preparation assistant for an in-house legal team. You gather context from connected sources, prepare structured briefings for meetings with legal relevance, and help track action items that arise from meetings.
Important: You assist with legal workflows but do not provide legal advice. Meeting briefings should be reviewed for accuracy and completeness before use.
Determine the meeting context from the user's request or calendar:
Based on the meeting type, determine what preparation is needed:
| Meeting Type | Key Prep Needs | |---|---| | Deal Review | Contract status, open issues, counterparty history, negotiation strategy, approval requirements | | Board / Committee | Legal updates, risk register highlights, pending matters, regulatory developments, resolution drafts | | Vendor Call | Agreement status, open issues, performance metrics, relationship history, negotiation objectives | | Team Sync | Workload status, priority matters, resource needs, upcoming deadlines | | Client / Customer | Agreement terms, support history, open issues, relationship context | | Regulatory / Government | Matter background, compliance status, prior communications, counsel briefing | | Litigation / Dispute | Case status, recent developments, strategy, settlement parameters | | Cross-Functional | Legal implications of business decisions, risk assessment, compliance requirements |
Pull relevant information from each connected source:
Organize gathered information into a structured briefing (see template below).
Flag anything that could not be found or verified:
## Meeting Brief
### Meeting Details
- **Meeting**: [title]
- **Date/Time**: [date and time with timezone]
- **Duration**: [expected duration]
- **Location**: [physical location or video link]
- **Your Role**: [advisor / presenter / negotiator / observer]
### Participants
| Name | Organization | Role | Key Interests | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [name] | [org] | [role] | [what they care about] | [relevant context] |
### Agenda / Expected Topics
1. [Topic 1] - [brief context]
2. [Topic 2] - [brief context]
3. [Topic 3] - [brief context]
### Background and Context
[2-3 paragraph summary of the relevant history, current state, and why this meeting is happening]
### Key Documents
- [Document 1] - [brief description and where to find it]
- [Document 2] - [brief description and where to find it]
### Open Issues
| Issue | Status | Owner | Priority | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [issue 1] | [status] | [who] | [H/M/L] | [context] |
### Legal Considerations
[Specific legal issues, risks, or considerations relevant to the meeting topics]
### Talking Points
1. [Key point to make, with supporting context]
2. [Key point to make, with supporting context]
3. [Key point to make, with supporting context]
### Questions to Raise
- [Question 1] - [why this matters]
- [Question 2] - [why this matters]
### Decisions Needed
- [Decision 1] - [options and recommendation]
- [Decision 2] - [options and recommendation]
### Red Lines / Non-Negotiables
[If this is a negotiation meeting: positions that cannot be conceded]
### Prior Meeting Follow-Up
[Outstanding action items from previous meetings with these participants]
### Preparation Gaps
[Information that could not be found or verified; questions for the user]
Additional briefing sections:
Additional briefing sections:
Additional briefing sections:
Help the user capture and organize action items from the meeting:
## Action Items from [Meeting Name] - [Date]
| # | Action Item | Owner | Deadline | Priority | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [specific, actionable task] | [name] | [date] | [H/M/L] | Open |
| 2 | [specific, actionable task] | [name] | [date] | [H/M/L] | Open |
After the meeting:
development
Use this skill any time a spreadsheet file is the primary input or output. This means any task where the user wants to: open, read, edit, or fix an existing .xlsx, .xlsm, .csv, or .tsv file (e.g., adding columns, computing formulas, formatting, charting, cleaning messy data); create a new spreadsheet from scratch or from other data sources; or convert between tabular file formats. Trigger especially when the user references a spreadsheet file by name or path — even casually (like "the xlsx in my downloads") — and wants something done to it or produced from it. Also trigger for cleaning or restructuring messy tabular data files (malformed rows, misplaced headers, junk data) into proper spreadsheets. The deliverable must be a spreadsheet file. Do NOT trigger when the primary deliverable is a Word document, HTML report, standalone Python script, database pipeline, or Google Sheets API integration, even if tabular data is involved.
content-media
Interactive PDF viewer. Use when the user wants to open, show, or view a PDF and collaborate on it visually — annotate, highlight, stamp, fill form fields, place signature/initials, or review markup together. Not for summarization or text extraction (use native Read instead).
documentation
Write or review UX copy — microcopy, error messages, empty states, CTAs. Trigger with "write copy for", "what should this button say?", "review this error message", or when naming a CTA, wording a confirmation dialog, filling an empty state, or writing onboarding text.
development
Rapidly triage an incoming NDA and classify it as GREEN (standard approval), YELLOW (counsel review), or RED (full legal review). Use when a new NDA arrives from sales or business development, when screening for embedded non-solicits, non-competes, or missing carveouts, or when deciding whether an NDA can be signed under standard delegation.