.agents/skills/compliance-check/SKILL.md
Run a compliance check on a proposed action, product feature, or business initiative, surfacing applicable regulations, required approvals, and risk areas. Use when launching a feature that touches personal data, when marketing or product proposes something with regulatory implications, or when you need to know which approvals and jurisdictional requirements apply before proceeding.
npx skillsauth add mmahalwy/cooper compliance-checkInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Run a compliance check on a proposed action, product feature, marketing campaign, or business initiative.
Important: This command assists with legal workflows but does not provide legal advice. Compliance assessments should be reviewed by qualified legal professionals. Regulatory requirements change frequently; always verify current requirements with authoritative sources.
/compliance-check $ARGUMENTS
Describe what you're planning to do. Examples:
## Compliance Check: [Initiative]
### Summary
[Quick assessment: Proceed / Proceed with conditions / Requires further review]
### Applicable Regulations and Policies
| Regulation/Policy | Relevance | Key Requirements |
|-------------------|-----------|-----------------|
| [GDPR / CCPA / HIPAA / etc.] | [How it applies] | [What you need to do] |
### Requirements
| # | Requirement | Status | Action Needed |
|---|-------------|--------|---------------|
| 1 | [Requirement] | [Met / Not Met / Unknown] | [What to do] |
### Risk Areas
| Risk | Severity | Mitigation |
|------|----------|------------|
| [Risk] | [High/Med/Low] | [How to address] |
### Recommended Actions
1. [Most important action]
2. [Second priority]
3. [Third priority]
### Approvals Needed
| Approver | Why | Status |
|----------|-----|--------|
| [Person/Team] | [Reason] | [Pending] |
### Further Review Recommended
[Areas where outside counsel or specialist review is advised]
Scope: Applies to processing of personal data of individuals in the EU/EEA, regardless of where the processing organization is located.
Key Obligations for In-House Legal Teams:
Common In-House Legal Touchpoints:
Scope: Applies to businesses that collect personal information of California residents and meet revenue, data volume, or data sale thresholds.
Key Obligations:
Response Timelines:
| Regulation | Jurisdiction | Key Differentiators | |---|---|---| | LGPD (Brazil) | Brazil | Similar to GDPR; requires DPO appointment; National Data Protection Authority (ANPD) enforcement | | POPIA (South Africa) | South Africa | Information Regulator oversight; required registration of processing | | PIPEDA (Canada) | Canada (federal) | Consent-based framework; OPC oversight; being modernized | | PDPA (Singapore) | Singapore | Do Not Call registry; mandatory breach notification; PDPC enforcement | | Privacy Act (Australia) | Australia | Australian Privacy Principles (APPs); notifiable data breaches scheme | | PIPL (China) | China | Strict cross-border transfer rules; data localization requirements; CAC oversight | | UK GDPR | United Kingdom | Post-Brexit UK version; ICO oversight; similar to EU GDPR with UK-specific adequacy |
When reviewing a Data Processing Agreement or Data Processing Addendum, verify the following:
| Issue | Risk | Standard Position | |---|---|---| | Blanket sub-processor authorization without notification | Loss of control over processing chain | Require notification with right to object | | Breach notification timeline > 72 hours | May prevent timely regulatory notification | Require notification within 24-48 hours | | No audit rights (or audit rights only via third-party reports) | Cannot verify compliance | Accept SOC 2 Type II + right to audit upon cause | | Data deletion timeline not specified | Data retained indefinitely | Require deletion within 30-90 days of termination | | No data processing locations specified | Data could be processed anywhere | Require disclosure of processing locations | | Outdated SCCs | Invalid transfer mechanism | Require current EU SCCs (2021 version) |
When a data subject request is received:
Identify the request type:
Identify applicable regulation(s):
Verify identity:
Log the request:
| Regulation | Initial Acknowledgment | Substantive Response | Extension | |---|---|---|---| | GDPR | Not specified (best practice: promptly) | 30 days | +60 days (with notice) | | CCPA/CPRA | 10 business days | 45 calendar days | +45 days (with notice) | | UK GDPR | Not specified (best practice: promptly) | 30 days | +60 days (with notice) | | LGPD | Not specified | 15 days | Limited extensions |
Before fulfilling a request, check whether any exemptions apply:
Common exemptions across regulations:
Organization-specific considerations:
Maintain awareness of developments in:
Escalate regulatory developments to senior counsel or leadership when:
development
Use this skill any time a spreadsheet file is the primary input or output. This means any task where the user wants to: open, read, edit, or fix an existing .xlsx, .xlsm, .csv, or .tsv file (e.g., adding columns, computing formulas, formatting, charting, cleaning messy data); create a new spreadsheet from scratch or from other data sources; or convert between tabular file formats. Trigger especially when the user references a spreadsheet file by name or path — even casually (like "the xlsx in my downloads") — and wants something done to it or produced from it. Also trigger for cleaning or restructuring messy tabular data files (malformed rows, misplaced headers, junk data) into proper spreadsheets. The deliverable must be a spreadsheet file. Do NOT trigger when the primary deliverable is a Word document, HTML report, standalone Python script, database pipeline, or Google Sheets API integration, even if tabular data is involved.
content-media
Interactive PDF viewer. Use when the user wants to open, show, or view a PDF and collaborate on it visually — annotate, highlight, stamp, fill form fields, place signature/initials, or review markup together. Not for summarization or text extraction (use native Read instead).
documentation
Write or review UX copy — microcopy, error messages, empty states, CTAs. Trigger with "write copy for", "what should this button say?", "review this error message", or when naming a CTA, wording a confirmation dialog, filling an empty state, or writing onboarding text.
development
Rapidly triage an incoming NDA and classify it as GREEN (standard approval), YELLOW (counsel review), or RED (full legal review). Use when a new NDA arrives from sales or business development, when screening for embedded non-solicits, non-competes, or missing carveouts, or when deciding whether an NDA can be signed under standard delegation.