skills/agentic/trust-and-safety/SKILL.md
Trust, safety, and control patterns for production agentic systems with human-in-the-loop gates and guardrails. Use when: designing guardrails or human-in-the-loop gates for an agent, or hardening an agentic system against prompt injection.
npx skillsauth add mikeparcewski/wicked-garden wicked-garden-agentic-trust-and-safetyInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Essential patterns for building safe, trustworthy, production-ready agentic systems.
Always require approval for:
Consider approval for:
async def execute_with_approval(action, threshold=0.8):
if action.confidence < threshold or action.is_high_stakes():
approval = await request_human_approval(action)
if not approval.approved:
raise ApprovalDenied(approval.reason)
return await action.execute()
Synchronous Approval: Block until human responds (for urgent decisions) Asynchronous Approval: Queue for later review (for batch operations) Escalation Chains: Route to higher authority if primary approver unavailable Timeout Handling: Define what happens if no approval received
See refs/guardrails-input-output.md, refs/guardrails-actions.md, and refs/guardrails-resources.md for detailed implementation patterns.
Force outputs into validated schemas using Pydantic or similar.
Check outputs before acting on them:
Cross-Validation: Multiple agents check same fact Source Verification: Verify claims against ground truth Confidence Thresholds: Reject low-confidence outputs Fact Checking: Use retrieval to verify factual claims
See refs/guardrails-input-output.md for code examples.
Safer than blacklisting. Define allowed commands/actions explicitly.
Isolate agent execution:
Prevent runaway resource usage:
See refs/guardrails-actions.md and refs/guardrails-resources.md for implementation details.
Clean user inputs before passing to LLM. Remove instruction-like patterns.
Use clear delimiters to separate system instructions from user input.
Separate instruction and data contexts using role-based message formatting.
See refs/guardrails-input-output.md for defense patterns and code examples.
Regex patterns for email, SSN, credit cards, phone numbers, etc.
Replace detected PII with [REDACTED_TYPE] tokens.
See refs/guardrails-input-output.md for detection and redaction code.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): Retrieve facts before generation Citation Requirements: Require source citations for all claims
Multi-Agent Verification: Independent verification by multiple agents Confidence Calibration: Require confidence scores, reject low-confidence outputs
See refs/guardrails-actions.md and refs/guardrails-resources.md for implementation patterns.
Kill Switch: Emergency stop that halts all operations and alerts administrators. Circuit Breaker: Opens circuit after threshold failures to prevent cascading failures. Rate Limiting: Limits requests per user/time window to prevent abuse.
See refs/guardrails-actions.md and refs/guardrails-resources.md for complete implementations.
See refs/safety-checklist-core.md for the full pre-deployment checklist covering human gates, validation, whitelisting, resource limits, PII, prompt injection, hallucination, circuit breakers, rate limiting, kill switches, audit logging, and rollback. See refs/safety-checklist-advanced.md for monitoring, incidents, testing, and ops checklists.
refs/safety-checklist-core.md - Core safety checklist (input, output, action, auth, privacy)refs/safety-checklist-advanced.md - Advanced safety checklist (monitoring, incidents, testing, ops)refs/guardrails-input-output.md - Input validation, sanitization, prompt injection, output filteringrefs/guardrails-actions.md - Action whitelisting, approvals, sandboxed executionrefs/guardrails-resources.md - Resource limiting, monitoring, complete guardrail architecturedevelopment
Pattern-conformance agent-half: evaluates a produced artifact or diff against a set of architectural/design pattern rules from the conformance-rule store (wicked_governance schema). Returns structured findings with rule ID, severity, and rationale — the deterministic half (mechanical rule recall) is done by the guard pipeline; this is the semantic evaluation step. Triggered by: the guard_pipeline `outgov_pattern` check (session-close), or explicitly by an engineering review when WICKED_OUTGOV_RULES_DIR is populated. NOT a replacement for the full `engineering` review skill — focuses only on conformance to stored Pattern rules; architecture and code-quality checks live in the `engineering` skill. Semantic evaluation reuses `wicked-garden-qe-semantic-reviewer` as the designated agent-half evaluator (per garden#983 spec). This skill is the orchestrating wrapper that loads applicable Pattern rules and delegates the per-rule semantic judgment to qe-semantic-reviewer.
tools
The FOUNDATIONAL domain-model capability: extract a codebase's domain — testable business rules (with confidence + provenance), entities, requirements — as a schema-conformant model on the estate graph. The workers annotate the store; wicked-core reads it and builds the requirements graph, coverage-gating fail-closed. Steers three fork workers. A shared substrate, not a modernization tool. The `modernize` archetype DERIVES from it; build / migrate / review / specify / explore consume the SAME domain model — none OWN it. Understanding a codebase's domain is upstream of almost everything else garden does. Use when: "extract the business rules / domain model from this codebase", "build a requirements graph from the code", "what does this system actually require", "reverse-engineer the domain before we build/port/migrate". Works on ANY codebase (modern or legacy) — the value is the domain model, not the porting. NOT the code transform itself (that is the archetype consuming this model). This skill produces the DOMAIN MODEL, not new code.
development
Domain-graph fork worker for the modernize archetype. Groups the estate's Louvain communities into business domains, attaches each requirement to its cluster (advisory cluster_id provenance), and invokes wicked-core's domain-graph build (which reads the annotated estate store, recomputes coverage fail-closed, and builds the requirements graph) — then validates core's output against the vendored schema. Use when: dispatched by wicked-garden-domain after rule extraction to turn a flat rule set into cluster-keyed domains; "group these into domains", "build the requirements graph", "translate clusters into a domain model". NOT for mining the rules themselves (that is domain-extractor) or threat-modeling (that is domain-coverage).
tools
Rule-extraction fork worker for the FOUNDATIONAL domain-model capability. Mines testable business rules from a codebase — each with a numeric confidence and a provenance{source, ref, source_kinds} — and annotates them into the estate store so wicked-core can build the domain-model requirements graph (coverage-gated). This is a substrate, not a modernization tool: the `modernize` archetype DERIVES from it, and build / migrate / review / specify / explore can consume the same domain model — none OWN it. Use when: dispatched by wicked-garden-domain to mine the business_rules of a codebase (or a module); "extract the domain rules", "what does this system require", building the requirements half of a domain model. NOT for grouping into domains (that is domain-modeler) or judging coverage (that is domain-coverage — a seat-distinct evaluator).