skills/smaht/propose-skills/SKILL.md
Mine recent Claude Code session transcripts to propose skills that would automate repetitive patterns the user actually does. Read-only MVP — outputs a markdown report only. No interactive UI, no scaffolding handoff in v1 (those are v2/v3 follow-ups). Use when: "find skills I should build", "what should I automate", "propose skills from my sessions", "mine my history for skill ideas", "session-mined skill builder", "skill discovery from past usage".
npx skillsauth add mikeparcewski/wicked-garden wicked-garden-smaht-propose-skillsInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Detect recurring patterns in Claude Code session transcripts and emit a markdown report of skill candidates. The framework grows from what the user actually does, not from speculative authoring (#677).
# Default — current project, last 10 sessions
sh "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/_python.sh" \
"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/smaht/propose_skills.py"
# Scan a different project (use --project= because the slug starts with '-')
sh "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/_python.sh" \
"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/smaht/propose_skills.py" \
--project=-Users-me-Projects-other --limit 25
# Print structured JSON alongside the markdown report
sh "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/_python.sh" \
"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/smaht/propose_skills.py" --json
Output modes:
--json — prints a JSON object on stdout with report_path, scan stats, and
the full candidates array. The markdown report is still written to disk.Do not auto-invoke /wg-scaffold — this is a read-only proposer.
| Kind | Trigger |
|------|---------|
| Repeated tool sequence | Same ordered N-tuple of tool names appears in >= 3 distinct sessions (N in [2, 5]). Homogeneous sequences like Bash → Bash → Bash are filtered. |
| Repeated prompt template | User prompts whose first 5 normalized words match across >= 3 sessions. Generic continuations (yes, continue) and Claude Code system envelopes (<local-command-...>, <command-name>) are filtered. |
| Repeated bash shape | Same first 2 tokens of a bash command across >= 3 sessions (e.g. gh pr ...). Generic file-inspection commands (ls, cat, cd, ...) are filtered. |
${CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR:-~/.claude}/projects/{project-slug}/*.jsonl.
The analyzer honors CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR so users with custom config dirs
(e.g. $HOME/alt-configs/.claude) get matched correctly. Default slug
is derived from the current working directory..jsonl line, extracting tool_use items from assistant
messages and the leading text of user messages. Robust against malformed
lines.private or secret (case-insensitive). The check runs on the
FULL untruncated prompt — a trigger token past the 200-char detector limit
still flags the session.MIN_FREQUENCY (total occurrences) AND MIN_SESSION_COUNT (distinct
sessions) — those are independent counters, not the same number./wg-scaffold skill <name> --domain <d>
suggestion. Domain is inferred from tool / bash keywords.tempfile.gettempdir()/wg-propose-skills-{timestamp}.md. On macOS this
resolves to a per-user dir under /var/folders/...; on Linux it follows
$TMPDIR and falls back to /tmp. Print the report path (default mode)
or a JSON envelope including the full candidates array (--json mode).tempfile.gettempdir(). Never modifies
session files.pathlib.Path,
tempfile.gettempdir(), no third-party deps.$HOME are scrubbed to ~/... in the
report. Sessions mentioning private / secret are skipped entirely.These are explicit v2 / v3 follow-ups and out of scope for this MVP:
/wg-scaffold or the scaffolding skill.After running the script, the assistant should reply with something like:
Report: /var/folders/.../wg-propose-skills-20260427T030000Z.md (4 candidates)
Top 3 candidates:
1. run-curl-s — `curl -s …` shell pattern, 24 occurrences across 12 sessions
2. run-pnpm-run — `pnpm run …` shell pattern, 9 occurrences across 6 sessions
3. run-lsof-ti-4321 — `lsof -ti:4321 …` shell pattern, 5 occurrences across 5 sessions
Run `/wg-scaffold skill <name> --domain <d>` for any candidate that's
worth building.
Exit codes:
0 — graceful run (even when no candidates are found).1 — failed to write the report file (I/O error after analysis succeeded)./wg-scaffold skill ... — manual scaffolding (the v2 handoff target).hookify:hookify — different direction (proposes hooks, not skills).claude-code-setup:claude-automation-recommender — codebase-level analysis,
not session-level.scripts/smaht/propose_skills.pytests/smaht/test_propose_skills.py (3 detectors + dedupe + privacy
scrub + end-to-end smoke).scenarios/smaht/propose-skills-shape.md.development
Pattern-conformance agent-half: evaluates a produced artifact or diff against a set of architectural/design pattern rules from the conformance-rule store (wicked_governance schema). Returns structured findings with rule ID, severity, and rationale — the deterministic half (mechanical rule recall) is done by the guard pipeline; this is the semantic evaluation step. Triggered by: the guard_pipeline `outgov_pattern` check (session-close), or explicitly by an engineering review when WICKED_OUTGOV_RULES_DIR is populated. NOT a replacement for the full `engineering` review skill — focuses only on conformance to stored Pattern rules; architecture and code-quality checks live in the `engineering` skill. Semantic evaluation reuses `wicked-garden-qe-semantic-reviewer` as the designated agent-half evaluator (per garden#983 spec). This skill is the orchestrating wrapper that loads applicable Pattern rules and delegates the per-rule semantic judgment to qe-semantic-reviewer.
tools
The FOUNDATIONAL domain-model capability: extract a codebase's domain — testable business rules (with confidence + provenance), entities, requirements — as a schema-conformant model on the estate graph. The workers annotate the store; wicked-core reads it and builds the requirements graph, coverage-gating fail-closed. Steers three fork workers. A shared substrate, not a modernization tool. The `modernize` archetype DERIVES from it; build / migrate / review / specify / explore consume the SAME domain model — none OWN it. Understanding a codebase's domain is upstream of almost everything else garden does. Use when: "extract the business rules / domain model from this codebase", "build a requirements graph from the code", "what does this system actually require", "reverse-engineer the domain before we build/port/migrate". Works on ANY codebase (modern or legacy) — the value is the domain model, not the porting. NOT the code transform itself (that is the archetype consuming this model). This skill produces the DOMAIN MODEL, not new code.
development
Domain-graph fork worker for the modernize archetype. Groups the estate's Louvain communities into business domains, attaches each requirement to its cluster (advisory cluster_id provenance), and invokes wicked-core's domain-graph build (which reads the annotated estate store, recomputes coverage fail-closed, and builds the requirements graph) — then validates core's output against the vendored schema. Use when: dispatched by wicked-garden-domain after rule extraction to turn a flat rule set into cluster-keyed domains; "group these into domains", "build the requirements graph", "translate clusters into a domain model". NOT for mining the rules themselves (that is domain-extractor) or threat-modeling (that is domain-coverage).
tools
Rule-extraction fork worker for the FOUNDATIONAL domain-model capability. Mines testable business rules from a codebase — each with a numeric confidence and a provenance{source, ref, source_kinds} — and annotates them into the estate store so wicked-core can build the domain-model requirements graph (coverage-gated). This is a substrate, not a modernization tool: the `modernize` archetype DERIVES from it, and build / migrate / review / specify / explore can consume the same domain model — none OWN it. Use when: dispatched by wicked-garden-domain to mine the business_rules of a codebase (or a module); "extract the domain rules", "what does this system require", building the requirements half of a domain model. NOT for grouping into domains (that is domain-modeler) or judging coverage (that is domain-coverage — a seat-distinct evaluator).