skills/classify/SKILL.md
v11 LLM-based work-shape classifier. Replaces the regex archetype detector with the model's own reasoning. Reads the user's prompt, picks the right archetype(s) from the catalog, identifies signals (blast_radius, novelty, reversibility, etc.), and persists to SessionState so subsequent turns steer correctly. Use when: the prompt_submit hook emitted a `<wg classify-due />` directive, OR explicitly invoked at session start, OR when re-classifying after the user changes scope mid-session.
npx skillsauth add mikeparcewski/wicked-garden wicked-garden-classifyInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
You are classifying a prompt into a v11 work-shape archetype. Your output drives downstream archetype routing for the rest of the session (until the user changes scope or invokes this skill again).
The v11 hook auto-classifier is a regex + boolean-signal heuristic. It works for prompts whose vocabulary matches the catalog phrase lists, but it misses paraphrases and underuses signals. You are a better classifier than regex. This skill is the path to use the model's full reasoning on the classification step, then persist the result so the rest of the session benefits without re-running classification on every turn.
This skill is the session router. The former wicked-signals product (a
separate text-in / intent-out classifier) was archived because intent /
work-shape classification is a native model capability — the router is just a
model reading the prompt with full tool access (allowed-tools: ["*"]), which
is exactly this skill. Read it as one council member making the routing call on
the fast path.
When a routing or decision call is genuinely hard, ambiguous, or high-stakes,
escalate to the multi-model council (wicked-garden-jam → council, worker
wicked-garden-jam-council): multiple independent models deliberate, still with
garden tools for additional processing. The council is the escalation, not a
per-prompt router — convening 20 CLIs on every prompt would be absurd cost.
prompt_submit hook emits <wg classify-due />,
you classify + persist here, the parent turn steers on the persisted archetype.wicked-garden-jam council <question> --options "…"..claude-plugin/archetypes.json defines the work-shape archetypes. Read it
once at the start of this skill. Summary table:
| Archetype | Phases | Use when | |-----------|-----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------| | triage | classify | prompt is genuinely ambiguous; ask for clarification | | explore | frame → diverge → converge | open problem space, multiple paths, brainstorm | | specify | elicit → structure → validate | requirements / acceptance criteria need writing | | decide | brief → options → score → record | 2+ viable options, need an ADR | | ship | canary → ramp → full → soak | already-built change being rolled out | | review | scope → assess → findings → remediate-or-accept | independent assessment of an artifact | | incident | triage → investigate → mitigate → resolve → followup | live production failure | | build | plan → implement → test → review | implement a feature or fix (most common) | | migrate | plan → expand → backfill → cutover → contract | in-place shape change with rollback proof | | modernize | discover → extract → blueprint → transform → parity → cutover | port a legacy codebase to a new stack (NOT in-place) |
What is the user actually asking for? Restate in one sentence in your own words. If you can't, the prompt is genuinely ambiguous → triage.
Archetypes are NOT mutually exclusive. Pick a SET. Common combinations:
build + migratereview + shipdecide (and
possibly build if they want you to also implement it)Score each match between 0.0 and 1.0. Use these calibration anchors:
If nothing scores ≥ 0.5, return triage only — that's the signal to ask
for clarification before doing work.
Boolean flags that downstream archetypes use to scale rigor. Mark TRUE only when the prompt clearly implies it:
blast_radius_high — change affects production traffic / many users / many systems.novelty_high — pattern not yet in this codebase.state_complexity_high — touches data shape, migrations, persistent state.reversibility_low — undoing is expensive (data migrations, destructive ops).reversibility_medium_or_low — undoing is non-trivial (config changes, breaking APIs).production_impact — production users / systems affected right now.compliance_scope — GDPR / SOC2 / HIPAA / PCI surface.ambiguity_high — multiple plausible reads.spec_ambiguity_high — success criteria are fuzzy.scope_unclear — boundary of work is undefined.multiple_viable_options — 2+ paths with no obvious winner.post_build — change is already implemented; this is about deployment.code_change — implementation work involved.independent_assessment_needed — someone else's work needs review.Default any flag you didn't explicitly mark to FALSE. Do not over-tag.
Intent is coarser than archetype — used by the hook to gate directive emission. One of:
simple-edit — typo, comment, formatting, single-line fix. Hook stays silent.feature — most non-trivial work (default for build/migrate/ship).rigor — high stakes (compliance, security, blast_radius_high).research — exploratory (explore, decide).Emit a JSON object with the four keys above and pipe to the persist script. Use this exact shape — extras get dropped:
echo '{
"intent": "feature",
"archetypes": [
{"name": "build", "score": 0.85, "evidence": ["implement keyword + code_change signal"]},
{"name": "migrate", "score": 0.65, "evidence": ["schema change + state_complexity signal"]}
],
"signals": {
"code_change": true,
"state_complexity_high": true,
"reversibility_low": true
}
}' | sh "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/_python.sh" \
"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/classify/persist.py"
The script normalises and writes to SessionState. Confirm the response
shows "ok": true, then return control.
You are context: fork — your job is to classify, persist, and return, not to
run the work. Do not start executing the playbook inside this fork; the
persisted archetype is what the parent turn resumes on (the prompt_submit
hook's Tier-1 path re-emits the steered <wg archetype=… /> on the next turn
from what you wrote to SessionState). The top archetype's playbook is
skills/archetype/refs/{name}.md. Do not re-run classification mid-session
unless the user explicitly changes scope.
/wicked-garden:archetype:<name> directly — they
already classified.classified_at set for this session and the
prompt fits the existing classification. Re-classifying on every turn
is exactly the cost we're trying to avoid.development
Pattern-conformance agent-half: evaluates a produced artifact or diff against a set of architectural/design pattern rules from the conformance-rule store (wicked_governance schema). Returns structured findings with rule ID, severity, and rationale — the deterministic half (mechanical rule recall) is done by the guard pipeline; this is the semantic evaluation step. Triggered by: the guard_pipeline `outgov_pattern` check (session-close), or explicitly by an engineering review when WICKED_OUTGOV_RULES_DIR is populated. NOT a replacement for the full `engineering` review skill — focuses only on conformance to stored Pattern rules; architecture and code-quality checks live in the `engineering` skill. Semantic evaluation reuses `wicked-garden-qe-semantic-reviewer` as the designated agent-half evaluator (per garden#983 spec). This skill is the orchestrating wrapper that loads applicable Pattern rules and delegates the per-rule semantic judgment to qe-semantic-reviewer.
tools
The FOUNDATIONAL domain-model capability: extract a codebase's domain — testable business rules (with confidence + provenance), entities, requirements — as a schema-conformant model on the estate graph. The workers annotate the store; wicked-core reads it and builds the requirements graph, coverage-gating fail-closed. Steers three fork workers. A shared substrate, not a modernization tool. The `modernize` archetype DERIVES from it; build / migrate / review / specify / explore consume the SAME domain model — none OWN it. Understanding a codebase's domain is upstream of almost everything else garden does. Use when: "extract the business rules / domain model from this codebase", "build a requirements graph from the code", "what does this system actually require", "reverse-engineer the domain before we build/port/migrate". Works on ANY codebase (modern or legacy) — the value is the domain model, not the porting. NOT the code transform itself (that is the archetype consuming this model). This skill produces the DOMAIN MODEL, not new code.
development
Domain-graph fork worker for the modernize archetype. Groups the estate's Louvain communities into business domains, attaches each requirement to its cluster (advisory cluster_id provenance), and invokes wicked-core's domain-graph build (which reads the annotated estate store, recomputes coverage fail-closed, and builds the requirements graph) — then validates core's output against the vendored schema. Use when: dispatched by wicked-garden-domain after rule extraction to turn a flat rule set into cluster-keyed domains; "group these into domains", "build the requirements graph", "translate clusters into a domain model". NOT for mining the rules themselves (that is domain-extractor) or threat-modeling (that is domain-coverage).
tools
Rule-extraction fork worker for the FOUNDATIONAL domain-model capability. Mines testable business rules from a codebase — each with a numeric confidence and a provenance{source, ref, source_kinds} — and annotates them into the estate store so wicked-core can build the domain-model requirements graph (coverage-gated). This is a substrate, not a modernization tool: the `modernize` archetype DERIVES from it, and build / migrate / review / specify / explore can consume the same domain model — none OWN it. Use when: dispatched by wicked-garden-domain to mine the business_rules of a codebase (or a module); "extract the domain rules", "what does this system require", building the requirements half of a domain model. NOT for grouping into domains (that is domain-modeler) or judging coverage (that is domain-coverage — a seat-distinct evaluator).