skills/platform/audit/SKILL.md
Audit evidence collection and trail verification. Gathers artifacts, validates controls, generates audit reports, and maintains compliance documentation. Use when: "audit trail", "collect evidence", "audit report", "control testing", "compliance documentation", "gather audit evidence for SOC2/HIPAA/GDPR/PCI", or any former /wicked-garden:platform:audit invocation. NOT for defining compliance policies (use the compliance sub-skill) or ad hoc security checks (use the platform domain skill's security action).
npx skillsauth add mikeparcewski/wicked-garden wicked-garden-platform-auditInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Collect evidence and verify audit trails for compliance.
Invoked as <framework> [control_id|all]:
<framework> [control_id] (framework = soc2|hipaa|gdpr|pci;
control_id or all).Read("${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/platform/audit/refs/audit.md") — full
collection rubric, control-testing checklist, SOC2/HIPAA control matrix,
gap analysis, bus emit, and output format.Read("${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/platform/audit/refs/checklists-soc2-hipaa.md")
or refs/checklists-gdpr-pci-evidence.md. For evidence scripts and
organization: refs/checklists-evidence-operations.md.Identify audit targets:
Code Evidence:
Configuration Evidence:
Documentation Evidence:
Operational Evidence:
See refs/checklists-soc2-hipaa.md, refs/checklists-gdpr-pci-evidence.md, and refs/checklists-evidence-operations.md for comprehensive evidence checklists.
Test each control:
# Check encryption
grep -r "encrypt\|cipher\|AES\|TLS" {target}
# Check access controls
grep -r "authorize\|authenticate\|require.*auth" {target}
# Check audit logging
grep -r "log\|audit\|event" {target}
See refs/frameworks-soc2-hipaa.md and refs/frameworks-gdpr-pci.md for framework-specific control testing procedures.
Identify:
Create report with:
| Type | Description | Examples | |------|-------------|----------| | Design | Architecture | Diagrams, specs, policies | | Implementation | Code | Functions, configs, tests | | Operational | Runtime | Logs, metrics, incidents | | Process | Procedural | Approvals, reviews, training |
Attach audit evidence by appending to the task description (reference file paths checked into the repo):
TaskUpdate(
taskId="{task_id}",
description="{previous}\n\n## Audit Evidence: {control_id}\nEvidence file: {evidence_path}"
)
Find related evidence (FTS5 over indexed code):
wicked-brain:search "audit|logging|encrypt"
## Audit Report: {Framework}
**Status**: {READY|NEEDS WORK|NOT READY}
**Controls Tested**: {count} | **Gaps**: {count}
### Controls Tested
| ID | Status | Evidence |
|----|--------|----------|
| CC6.1 | PASS | auth.py:15 |
| CC7.2 | FAIL | Missing |
### Evidence
- Design: docs/arch.md
- Code: src/auth.py, src/crypto.py
- Operational: /var/log/audit.log
### Critical Gaps (P0)
1. Missing admin audit trail
2. No TLS for PII endpoints
### Recommendations
1. Fix P0 gaps before certification
2. Schedule follow-up audit
Good audit evidence:
Bad audit evidence:
development
Pattern-conformance agent-half: evaluates a produced artifact or diff against a set of architectural/design pattern rules from the conformance-rule store (wicked_governance schema). Returns structured findings with rule ID, severity, and rationale — the deterministic half (mechanical rule recall) is done by the guard pipeline; this is the semantic evaluation step. Triggered by: the guard_pipeline `outgov_pattern` check (session-close), or explicitly by an engineering review when WICKED_OUTGOV_RULES_DIR is populated. NOT a replacement for the full `engineering` review skill — focuses only on conformance to stored Pattern rules; architecture and code-quality checks live in the `engineering` skill. Semantic evaluation reuses `wicked-garden-qe-semantic-reviewer` as the designated agent-half evaluator (per garden#983 spec). This skill is the orchestrating wrapper that loads applicable Pattern rules and delegates the per-rule semantic judgment to qe-semantic-reviewer.
tools
The FOUNDATIONAL domain-model capability: extract a codebase's domain — testable business rules (with confidence + provenance), entities, requirements — as a schema-conformant model on the estate graph. The workers annotate the store; wicked-core reads it and builds the requirements graph, coverage-gating fail-closed. Steers three fork workers. A shared substrate, not a modernization tool. The `modernize` archetype DERIVES from it; build / migrate / review / specify / explore consume the SAME domain model — none OWN it. Understanding a codebase's domain is upstream of almost everything else garden does. Use when: "extract the business rules / domain model from this codebase", "build a requirements graph from the code", "what does this system actually require", "reverse-engineer the domain before we build/port/migrate". Works on ANY codebase (modern or legacy) — the value is the domain model, not the porting. NOT the code transform itself (that is the archetype consuming this model). This skill produces the DOMAIN MODEL, not new code.
development
Domain-graph fork worker for the modernize archetype. Groups the estate's Louvain communities into business domains, attaches each requirement to its cluster (advisory cluster_id provenance), and invokes wicked-core's domain-graph build (which reads the annotated estate store, recomputes coverage fail-closed, and builds the requirements graph) — then validates core's output against the vendored schema. Use when: dispatched by wicked-garden-domain after rule extraction to turn a flat rule set into cluster-keyed domains; "group these into domains", "build the requirements graph", "translate clusters into a domain model". NOT for mining the rules themselves (that is domain-extractor) or threat-modeling (that is domain-coverage).
tools
Rule-extraction fork worker for the FOUNDATIONAL domain-model capability. Mines testable business rules from a codebase — each with a numeric confidence and a provenance{source, ref, source_kinds} — and annotates them into the estate store so wicked-core can build the domain-model requirements graph (coverage-gated). This is a substrate, not a modernization tool: the `modernize` archetype DERIVES from it, and build / migrate / review / specify / explore can consume the same domain model — none OWN it. Use when: dispatched by wicked-garden-domain to mine the business_rules of a codebase (or a module); "extract the domain rules", "what does this system require", building the requirements half of a domain model. NOT for grouping into domains (that is domain-modeler) or judging coverage (that is domain-coverage — a seat-distinct evaluator).