skills/product/accessibility/SKILL.md
Use when auditing code for WCAG 2.1 AA compliance — keyboard navigation, ARIA patterns, color contrast, and semantic HTML. Produces prioritized remediation with code-level fixes. NOT for running automated a11y tools (use product:a11y command) or visual design review (use product/visual-review).
npx skillsauth add mikeparcewski/wicked-garden wicked-garden-product-accessibilityInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
WCAG 2.1 Level AA compliance auditing and inclusive design guidance.
Accessibility is not optional. It's legal compliance, user respect, and better code.
Information must be presentable to users in ways they can perceive.
Interface components must be operable.
Information and operation must be understandable.
Content must work with assistive technologies.
Full WCAG checklists: See refs/wcag-checklist.md
Use the Read tool on a screenshot file, or capture via browser automation if available (e.g., Playwright, Puppeteer, or an MCP browser tool). For automated WCAG scanning, use axe DevTools, Lighthouse, WAVE, or pa11y.
Full keyboard testing guide: See refs/keyboard-testing-basics.md and refs/keyboard-testing-patterns.md
Full screen reader guide: See refs/screen-reader-testing-commands.md and refs/screen-reader-testing-advanced.md
# Find potential issues
wicked-garden:search "<div.*onclick" --type html # Non-semantic buttons
wicked-garden:search "<img(?!.*alt)" --type html # Missing alt
wicked-garden:search "aria-" --type html # ARIA usage
<!-- ✗ Missing alt -->
<img src="profile.jpg">
<!-- ✓ Fixed -->
<img src="profile.jpg" alt="Profile of Jane Doe">
<!-- ✗ Non-semantic button -->
<div onclick="submit()">Submit</div>
<!-- ✓ Fixed -->
<button onclick="submit()">Submit</button>
<!-- ✗ Form without label -->
<input type="text" placeholder="Email">
<!-- ✓ Fixed -->
<label for="email">Email</label>
<input type="text" id="email">
<!-- ✗ Low contrast -->
<p style="color: #999; background: #fff;">Text</p> /* 2.5:1 */
<!-- ✓ Fixed -->
<p style="color: #666; background: #fff;">Text</p> /* 4.7:1 */
More examples: See refs/common-violations-html-css.md and refs/common-violations-interactive.md
## A11y Audit
**WCAG**: {✓ Pass | ⚠ Issues | ✗ Fail}
- Perceivable: {✓⚠✗}
- Operable: {✓⚠✗}
- Understandable: {✓⚠✗}
- Robust: {✓⚠✗}
### Critical (Level A)
- Issue: {description}
- WCAG: {criterion}
- Fix: {specific code}
### Major (Level AA)
- Issue: {description}
- WCAG: {criterion}
- Fix: {recommendation}
### Recommendations
1. {Priority fixes}
Full report template: See refs/audit-report-findings.md and refs/audit-report-results.md
Tools:
# Color contrast: compute the WCAG ratio (#666 on #fff = 5.74:1, passes AA
# body text); use axe / Lighthouse / WAVE / pa11y for automated scanning.
# Track issues via native TaskCreate
# TaskCreate(
# subject="A11y: {issue}",
# metadata={
# "event_type": "task",
# "chain_id": "a11y-review.root",
# "source_agent": "a11y-expert",
# "priority": "P0"
# }
# )
Collaboration:
Accessibility auditing can leverage available integrations by capability:
| Capability | Discovery Patterns | Provides |
|------------|-------------------|----------|
| A11y testing | axe, a11y, accessibility | Automated WCAG scanning |
| Browser testing | playwright, puppeteer | Screenshots, DOM snapshots |
| Performance | lighthouse | Combined a11y + performance audit |
Discover available integrations via capability detection. When none are available, fall back to computing the WCAG contrast ratio manually against the AA thresholds.
Detailed guides in refs/:
Legal context: ADA (US), Section 508 (gov), EAA (EU). ~15-20% of users need accessibility; screen readers double as SEO bots.
development
Pattern-conformance agent-half: evaluates a produced artifact or diff against a set of architectural/design pattern rules from the conformance-rule store (wicked_governance schema). Returns structured findings with rule ID, severity, and rationale — the deterministic half (mechanical rule recall) is done by the guard pipeline; this is the semantic evaluation step. Triggered by: the guard_pipeline `outgov_pattern` check (session-close), or explicitly by an engineering review when WICKED_OUTGOV_RULES_DIR is populated. NOT a replacement for the full `engineering` review skill — focuses only on conformance to stored Pattern rules; architecture and code-quality checks live in the `engineering` skill. Semantic evaluation reuses `wicked-garden-qe-semantic-reviewer` as the designated agent-half evaluator (per garden#983 spec). This skill is the orchestrating wrapper that loads applicable Pattern rules and delegates the per-rule semantic judgment to qe-semantic-reviewer.
tools
The FOUNDATIONAL domain-model capability: extract a codebase's domain — testable business rules (with confidence + provenance), entities, requirements — as a schema-conformant model on the estate graph. The workers annotate the store; wicked-core reads it and builds the requirements graph, coverage-gating fail-closed. Steers three fork workers. A shared substrate, not a modernization tool. The `modernize` archetype DERIVES from it; build / migrate / review / specify / explore consume the SAME domain model — none OWN it. Understanding a codebase's domain is upstream of almost everything else garden does. Use when: "extract the business rules / domain model from this codebase", "build a requirements graph from the code", "what does this system actually require", "reverse-engineer the domain before we build/port/migrate". Works on ANY codebase (modern or legacy) — the value is the domain model, not the porting. NOT the code transform itself (that is the archetype consuming this model). This skill produces the DOMAIN MODEL, not new code.
development
Domain-graph fork worker for the modernize archetype. Groups the estate's Louvain communities into business domains, attaches each requirement to its cluster (advisory cluster_id provenance), and invokes wicked-core's domain-graph build (which reads the annotated estate store, recomputes coverage fail-closed, and builds the requirements graph) — then validates core's output against the vendored schema. Use when: dispatched by wicked-garden-domain after rule extraction to turn a flat rule set into cluster-keyed domains; "group these into domains", "build the requirements graph", "translate clusters into a domain model". NOT for mining the rules themselves (that is domain-extractor) or threat-modeling (that is domain-coverage).
tools
Rule-extraction fork worker for the FOUNDATIONAL domain-model capability. Mines testable business rules from a codebase — each with a numeric confidence and a provenance{source, ref, source_kinds} — and annotates them into the estate store so wicked-core can build the domain-model requirements graph (coverage-gated). This is a substrate, not a modernization tool: the `modernize` archetype DERIVES from it, and build / migrate / review / specify / explore can consume the same domain model — none OWN it. Use when: dispatched by wicked-garden-domain to mine the business_rules of a codebase (or a module); "extract the domain rules", "what does this system require", building the requirements half of a domain model. NOT for grouping into domains (that is domain-modeler) or judging coverage (that is domain-coverage — a seat-distinct evaluator).