skills/skillify/SKILL.md
Capture a repeatable process from the current session into a reusable Amplifier SKILL.md skill file. Analyzes the conversation, interviews the user to confirm structure, and writes a complete skill to disk. Use when the user wants to create a skill, save a workflow as a skill, turn a process into a reusable skill, or mentions "skillify", "create skill", "make a skill", "save as skill", "capture workflow", "turn this into a skill", "new skill", or wants to automate a repeatable process they just performed.
npx skillsauth add microsoft/amplifier-bundle-skills skillifyInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Create a well-structured, reusable Amplifier SKILL.md skill file that captures
a repeatable process from the current session so it can be invoked again later
via /skill-name. The skill must conform to the Agent Skills specification
with Amplifier extensions.
$ARGUMENTS: (Optional) Description of the process to capture as a skill.Before writing any skill content, load the authoritative skills reference:
load_skill("skills-assist")
Ask skills-assist about:
skills-assist is the source of truth for Amplifier skill conventions. The examples in this skill are illustrative samples — consult skills-assist for the complete and up-to-date specification.
Success criteria: You have loaded and consulted skills-assist for the latest skill authoring conventions.
Before asking the user anything, analyze the conversation history to identify:
Success criteria: You have a clear mental model of the process, its steps, inputs, outputs, and success criteria.
Output density rule: Group related decisions into natural clusters — not one question per turn (tedious) and not everything at once (overwhelming). Present your analysis first, let the user absorb it, then ask related questions together. For example, present identity/routing decisions as one cluster, execution model decisions as another.
Calibrate interview depth to the complexity of the process. A simple 2-step workflow needs 1-2 rounds. A complex multi-step workflow with parallel tasks and irreversible actions needs the full treatment.
context: fork) as an isolated subagent. Forked is better for
self-contained tasks that don't need mid-process user input; inline is
better when the user wants to steer mid-process..amplifier/skills/<name>/SKILL.md) — project-specific~/.amplifier/skills/<name>/SKILL.md) — follows you across projectsamplifier-bundle-skills/skills/<name>/SKILL.md) — if
contributing to the curated collectionSkip this round for simple skills with obvious steps. For complex skills:
Pay special attention to places where the user corrected you during the session. These corrections are the most valuable design signals.
Stop interviewing once you have enough information. Don't over-ask for simple processes.
Success criteria: You have all the information needed to write the SKILL.md and the user has confirmed the design.
Create the skill directory and file at the location the user chose in Round 2.
Use this template as a starting point. Consult skills-assist for the full set of available frontmatter fields and current conventions:
---
name: {{skill-name}}
description: >
{{What this skill does. Front-load the key use case. Include trigger
phrases and "Use when..." guidance — this is what the model sees in the
skills visibility list to decide whether to auto-invoke.
Keep under 250 characters for the first sentence; can be longer overall.}}
user-invocable: true
allowed-tools:
{{list of Amplifier tool names observed during the session, e.g.:}}
{{- read_file}}
{{- write_file}}
{{- edit_file}}
{{- bash}}
{{- glob}}
{{- grep}}
{{- delegate}}
model_role: {{general | coding | reasoning | critique | writing | fast}}
{{Only include if forked:}}
{{context: fork}}
{{disable-model-invocation: true}}
---
# {{Skill Title}}
{{Brief statement of what the skill does and its goal. Define concrete
success artifacts — not just "writing code" but "a passing test suite
and a committed implementation."}}
## Inputs
- `$ARGUMENTS`: {{Description of expected arguments, or "(Optional) ..."}}
## Steps
### 1. {{Step Name}}
{{Specific, actionable instructions. Include commands when appropriate.}}
**Success criteria**: {{REQUIRED on every step. What proves this step
is done and we can move on.}}
Direct (default — omit if direct), Delegate to [agent]
(e.g., "Delegate to foundation:explorer"), or [human] (user does it)[human] in the titledescription must carry all routing weight — trigger phrases, "Use when..."
guidance, and example user messages belong here since this is what the
visibility hook shows to the modelallowed-tools should be the minimum set neededcontext: fork only for self-contained skills that don't need user steeringdisable-model-invocation: truemodel_role should match the skill's primary cognitive taskuser-invocable: true registers the skill as a /name slash commandSuccess criteria: The complete SKILL.md content has been drafted.
Before committing, verify the skill works:
Save the skill to .amplifier/skills/<name>/SKILL.md (immediately
discoverable, no config changes needed).
In the same session, call load_skill("<name>") and verify:
Optionally, spawn a test session via delegate(agent="self", context_depth="none") that loads the skill and follows its
instructions against a synthesized test input.
If issues are found, fix and re-test.
Success criteria: The skill loads correctly and its instructions are actionable.
Before writing the file, present the complete SKILL.md content in a yaml code block so the user can review it with proper syntax highlighting.
Ask the user: "Does this look good to save?"
After confirmation:
Create the skill directory:
mkdir -p <chosen-path>/<skill-name>
Write the SKILL.md file to <chosen-path>/<skill-name>/SKILL.md
If the skill references companion files (templates, examples, scripts), create those as well.
Tell the user:
/skill-name [arguments]Success criteria: The file is written to disk and the user knows how to use it.
tools
Curmudgeonly engineering advisor that provides grounded skepticism, evidence-linked judgment, and constructive progress on architectural decisions, legacy refactors, tooling choices, and broad "how should I start?" questions. Sounds like a senior systems engineer who has reviewed too many designs to be impressed, but still cares about correctness. Use when: architectural decisions, legacy replacements, new tooling evaluation, broad planning questions.
testing
Use when verifying that completed work actually works. Auto-surface during /verify mode, post-implementation review, or before claiming a task is done. Teaches the discipline of testing outcomes vs implementation, the unit/integration/smoke gradient, and what "done" actually means.
development
Use when starting work in any repository. Auto-surface when an agent is about to write code, create a PR, or verify work. Teaches the discovery pattern for finding and applying per-repo conventions (AGENTS.md, PR templates, CONTRIBUTING.md) before acting.
tools
Use when designing a curl-piped install script for a project that cannot use uv tool install or npm publish — multi-service stacks (Docker Compose), raw TS/React apps, tools that bootstrap system dependencies, or installs for non-technical audiences. Documents the security trade-off, the community convention used by rustup, bun, deno, fly, ollama, and supabase, and the cases where this pattern is the wrong answer.