plugins/power-pages/skills/add-ai-webapi/SKILL.md
Integrates Power Pages generative-AI summarization APIs (PREVIEW) into a Single Page Application (SPA) site — the Search Summary API and the Data Summarization API — on any record-detail or list page. Generates per-target service code (CSRF-handled) and AI site settings; delegates Web API settings, table permissions, and web roles to `/integrate-webapi` and `/create-webroles`. Use whenever a user wants AI/Copilot output that condenses Dataverse content on a Power Pages site — an AI summary, AI-generated overview or "key insights" across a record or list, a search-results summary, a case/incident summary, or recommendation-chip refinement — even when phrased as "AI-generated paragraph", "insights", or "overview". Do NOT use for: generative pages in model-driven apps (use the model-apps `genpage` skill), Copilot Studio agents/chatbots, summarizing documents or PDFs, Power BI dashboards, plain keyword search with no AI summary, or plain Dataverse CRUD (use `/integrate-webapi`).
npx skillsauth add microsoft/power-platform-skills add-ai-webapiInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Plugin check: Run
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/check-version.js"— if it outputs a message, show it to the user before proceeding.
Note
AI summarization APIs are a preview feature. Preview features aren't meant for production use and may have restricted functionality. These features are available before an official release so that customers can get early access and provide feedback.
Surface this note to the user verbatim during Phase 1 and again in the Phase 8 summary —
copy the exact **Note** block above (including its wording about "available before an official
release so that customers can get early access and provide feedback"). Do not paraphrase it into
your own "Preview-feature note: ..." sentence; the wording matches the Microsoft Learn preview
disclaimer and rephrasing it loses that fidelity.
Integrate Power Pages generative-AI summarization APIs into a SPA site. This skill focuses on the AI layer (Layer 3): the summarization service code and the Summarization/* site settings. The underlying Web API prerequisites — Webapi/<table>/enabled, Webapi/<table>/fields, table permissions, and web roles — are delegated to /integrate-webapi and /create-webroles so there is a single source of truth for every layer.
| # | API | URL | Body | Response |
|---|-----|-----|------|----------|
| 1 | Search Summary | POST /_api/search/v1.0/summary | { userQuery } | { Summary, Citations } |
| 2 | Data Summarization | POST /_api/summarization/data/v1.0/<entitySet>(<id>)?$select=...&$expand=... | { InstructionIdentifier } or { RecommendationConfig } | { Summary, Recommendations } |
Example: Microsoft-shipped Copilot summary on a support-case page. Data Summarization can be called with any combination of entity set, columns, and prompt — but Microsoft documents and ships one specific configuration for the standard
incidenttable:POST /_api/summarization/data/v1.0/incidents(<caseId>)?$select=description,title&$expand=incident_adx_portalcomments($select=description)with body{ "InstructionIdentifier": "Summarization/prompt/case_summary" }. This is sometimes called the "Case-page Copilot preset" in Microsoft Learn. Treat it as one possible Data Summarization recipe — useful when the user explicitly wants to mirror the Microsoft sample — not as an automatic recommendation. A custom case-like table (cr363_servicerequest,adx_case), or the standard incident table summarised on different facets (priority, owner, SLA timer), is just a regular Data Summarization call with maker-defined values.
Reference:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/add-ai-webapi/references/ai-api-reference.md— canonical API shapes, required headers, site-setting names, error codes, and the documented support-case example. Read this at the start of the workflow; fetch the Microsoft Learn source pages withmcp__plugin_power-pages_microsoft-learn__microsoft_docs_fetchif the user asks for the latest.
Admin governance hierarchy: both APIs are gated by a three-level admin hierarchy — tenant PowerShell setting (
enableGenerativeAIFeaturesForSiteUsers), Copilot Hub environment/site governance, and the site-level maker toggle (for Search Summary: Set up workspace → Copilot → Site search (preview) → Enable Site search with generative AI (preview)). Each level overrides the one below it, so "the maker toggle is on but the API still says disabled" is a real scenario — admin-level governance wins.The two endpoints surface disablement differently:
- Search Summary → HTTP 200 with an embedded envelope
{ Code: 400, Message: "Gen AI Search is disabled." }. The generatedfetchSearchSummarydetects this and throwsSearchSummaryApiError; the UI renders a remediation card.- Data Summarization → HTTP 400 with
error.code = 90041001(admin-level disabled) or90041003(per-siteSummarization/Data/Enable=false).Full troubleshooting checklist (tenant → environment → site, plus runtime version, Bing dependency, and cross-region data movement) lives in
references/ai-api-reference.md§1 "Troubleshooting: AI feature appears disabled (admin hierarchy)" — point users there when either disablement shape surfaces. Mention this governance hierarchy explicitly to the user before Phase 7, and again in the Phase 8 summary.
Built-in search control vs. custom code path: if the site uses the Microsoft-shipped Power Pages search control and only wants AI-summarised search results on that page, they don't need this skill — just the Copilot workspace toggle and the
Search/Summary/Titlecontent snippet. This skill is for sites that build their own search UI or need to call/_api/search/v1.0/summaryfrom custom code. Confirm which path the user is on in Phase 1.
/integrate-webapi and /create-webroles. This skill creates the summarization service code and the Summarization/* site settings — nothing else.plugins/power-pages/AGENTS.md, spawn the ai-webapi-integration agent sequentially per target (never in parallel). The first call establishes the shared summarization service file and CSRF helper; subsequent calls extend it. ai-webapi-settings-architect runs alone, after all code integrations land.fetch + CSRF. Every summarization request attaches __RequestVerificationToken (from /_layout/tokenhtml) and X-Requested-With: XMLHttpRequest. Never route through an OData wrapper./integrate-webapi when it's not needed. If every confirmed target is Search Summary (which has no per-table Web API prerequisites), or every Layer 1/2 prerequisite already exists on disk, the skill goes straight from Phase 3 to Phase 5.Prerequisites:
- An existing Power Pages SPA site created via
/create-site- A Dataverse data model (tables + columns) set up via
/setup-datamodelor manually — for any Data Summarization target- The site must have been deployed at least once (
.powerpages-sitefolder must exist) for the settings phase
Initial request: $ARGUMENTS
(Phase headings below the workflow keep the technical "Layer 1+2 / Layer 3" names because they describe the runtime layering and are what maintainers grep for. The titles here mirror the user-facing task list.)
/create-webroles if needed, then invoke /integrate-webapi in AI-only read mode for data/case targets. Skip entirely for search-only or when prerequisites already exist.ai-webapi-integration agent sequentially per target.ai-webapi-settings-architect agent.$select grep, npm run build, validator script./deploy-site.This skill is a one-shot setup skill — Phases 1–8 run end-to-end the first time the user asks
to integrate a summarization API. Once an AI surface is in place (service file, framework wrapper,
UI call site, and Summarization/* settings all exist), follow-up requests to tweak the rendered
UI (colours, spacing, copy, moving a button, a different empty-state message, wiring a second
recommendation into the hook, etc.) are not a reason to re-enter this skill mentally and run
every phase again. Doing so triggers a full pac pages upload-code-site and a chain of
git commits for each tweak, which is exactly the noisy cadence the Phase 5.5 / 6.4 prompts above
are there to avoid.
When the user asks for follow-up UI changes to an already-integrated AI surface:
npm run build locally to verify the tweak compiles. That is the
whole validation loop for a UI change.pac pages upload-code-site. Uploading should happen once, at the
end of the session, when the user has finished tweaking.git commit. Let the user batch related tweaks into a single commit.🚦 Gate (consent · add-ai-webapi:iter.deploy-commit): End-of-iteration batched deploy + commit prompt — avoids a noisy per-tweak upload/commit cadence.
Trigger: User signals they're done with UI tweaks for the session. Why we ask: Auto-deploying or committing after every small edit produces one
git commit+ onepac pages upload-code-siteper tweak; batching keeps history readable and avoids redundant deploys. Cancel leaves: Nothing — source files already edited; no deploy or commit fired.
Use AskUserQuestion:
| Question | Header | Options | |----------|--------|---------| | All the UI tweaks look good. Deploy the site and commit the changes now? | Deploy & commit | Yes, deploy and commit (Recommended), Just commit — I'll deploy later, Just deploy — I'll commit later, Neither — I'll handle both myself |
Re-enter the full skill flow only when the user is adding a new AI surface (a new page, a new table, a second API). If you're unsure whether a request is a tweak or a new surface, ask.
Goal: Locate the Power Pages project root and confirm prerequisites.
Re-entry detection comes first because the rest of the skill assumes a first-time setup. Capture two signals about the project state:
src/services/aiSummaryService.*, or any
source file under src/ that contains /_api/search/v1.0/summary or
/_api/summarization/data/v1.0/. When the signal is present, also note which API surface(s)
the service code references — search-only, data-only, or both. This sub-classification matters
below..powerpages-site/site-settings/Summarization-*.sitesetting.yml.Then route on the combination:
/add-ai-webapi run completed end-to-end. Show
the iteration-mode prompt below./_api/search/v1.0/summary but not /_api/summarization/data/v1.0/) → re-entry. Search-only
sites legitimately have no Summarization/* settings (Search Summary uses the workspace toggle,
not per-call settings), so the absence of the settings signal is the steady state, not a
failed run. Show the iteration-mode prompt below.When you reach the iteration-mode branch, ask:
| Question | Header | Options | |----------|--------|---------| | It looks like an AI summary surface is already wired into this site. Is this request a tweak to the existing one, or are you adding a brand-new surface (new page, new table, second API)? | Mode | Tweak the existing surface (Recommended for visual/copy edits), Add a new surface (run the full skill again), Not sure — show me what's already wired |
npm run build,
no auto upload-code-site, no auto commit, batched end-of-session prompt for deploy + commit.Summarization/* settings, then re-ask the same question.Create all 8 phase tasks upfront via TaskCreate — see Progress Tracking.
Look for powerpages.config.json in the current directory or immediate subdirectories.
If not found: tell the user to create a site first with /create-site.
Read package.json and detect React / Vue / Angular / Astro. See
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/framework-conventions.md.
Look for .datamodel-manifest.json. If found, read it — tables listed here are candidates for the
Data Summarization API. The standard incident table is a candidate like any other; do not
treat it specially.
Look for .powerpages-site. Phase 4 (/integrate-webapi) and Phase 6 (ai-webapi-settings-architect)
both require this folder to exist. Deferring the deploy until later is not a viable workaround:
once Phase 5 has written the AI-calling service code, deploying a site whose Layer 1/2/3 settings
aren't yet on disk publishes runtime-broken code (every summarization call 403/500s until a second
deploy lands). The cleanest sequence is to deploy the clean scaffold now, before any AI code
exists.
If .powerpages-site does NOT exist:
| Question | Header | Options |
|----------|--------|---------|
| .powerpages-site was not found. The AI summary skill needs the site deployed at least once before configuring permissions and settings. Deploy the clean scaffold now (no AI code yet — keeps the intermediate state safe), or stop and run /deploy-site yourself first? | Bootstrap deploy | Yes, deploy the scaffold now (Recommended), Stop — I'll deploy first then re-run /add-ai-webapi |
On Yes: invoke the Skill tool for power-pages:deploy-site and wait for completion. Then
re-check .powerpages-site exists before proceeding. If it is still absent after the
sub-skill returns (deploy failed mid-flow, the user cancelled it, or an upload completed but the
local folder wasn't created), stop here with a clear message — surface the deploy-site outcome
verbatim so the user can debug it, and tell them to re-run /deploy-site followed by
/add-ai-webapi. Do NOT silently fall through to Phase 2; the downstream sub-skills require this
folder.
On Stop: end the skill with a clear next-step message ("Run /deploy-site, then re-invoke
/add-ai-webapi to continue"). Do NOT continue to Phase 2 — the downstream sub-skills can't run.
Look for .powerpages-site/web-roles/*.yml. Record whether any roles exist — the Phase 4
delegation needs at least one role before /integrate-webapi can create table permissions.
Output: confirmed project root, framework, data-model availability, deployment status, web-role inventory.
Goal: Find every candidate for each of the two APIs — scoped to AI only.
The full Explore-agent prompt body, manifest shape, and delegation-decision rules live in
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/add-ai-webapi/references/explore-prompt.md. Read that file
first, then invoke the Explore agent (via Task with subagent_type: "Explore",
thoroughness medium) and pass the prompt body verbatim.
What the Explore agent reports back (summary — see the reference for the exact prompt):
POWERPAGES:AI-SLOT kind=<pick>) — authoritative placement hints
planted by /create-site; orphan markers are flagged for Phase 3 to resolve.single-record / list / intent-mismatch,
each with the existing fetch's OData query and a scope classification
(matches-existing-fetch / scope-extends-beyond-existing-fetch / needs-definition /
intent-mismatch).powerPagesApi.ts, prior aiSummaryService.*.$expand target —
ready / missing / n/a (search).ready rows whose existing
Webapi/<table>/fields is broader than the AI surface needs (primary key included, lookup
write forms, unused columns), flagged fields-broader-than-ai-mode so Phase 3 can surface
it.Summarization/Data/Enable and the
specific Summarization/prompt/<id> the code will send.Compile the integration manifest from the agent's output (one row per candidate, columns:
#, API, Target file, Target kind, Entity Set, $select / $expand, Source,
Layer 1/2 status, Layer 3 status) — the reference file contains a worked example.
Delegation decisions (compute directly from the status columns):
/integrate-webapi? → True if any row's Layer 1/2 status is missing. Send only the
missing-status rows in the tables= sentinel; don't re-audit settled tables.ai-webapi-settings-architect? → True if any row's Layer 3 status is missing.Output: integration manifest + delegation decisions + existing-infra report + fields-broader-than-ai-mode advisory list (if any).
Goal: Present the manifest and confirm which APIs / targets to integrate.
Show the user:
/integrate-webapi for [tables]",
"Will invoke ai-webapi-settings-architect for Layer 3").powerPagesApi.ts, previous
aiSummaryService.*).Before asking the integration question, briefly tell the user how many more decision points are coming so the "one-shot" run isn't surprising. Count them from the Key decision points list, subtracting the ones that don't apply for this run:
/integrate-webapi delegation (Phase 4) and the settings
architect (Phase 6) — 4–5 more pauses after this one.Phrase it as a heads-up, not a warning — e.g., "I'll pause for your input ~6 more times after this one (web-role choice, two architect plans, two commit prompts, final deploy). Could be a couple more if any list target needs a trigger or scope decision."
Use AskUserQuestion and build the option list dynamically from the Phase 2 manifest — do
not hardcode "Search summary and Data summarization" when only one category has candidates.
Construct the question text from what was found:
<page>?").The default option list, with rows present only when the corresponding category has candidates:
| Option | When to include | |--------|-----------------| | All of them (Recommended) | Both categories present | | Only Search Summary | Search candidates present AND Data Summarization candidates present | | Only Data Summarization | Data Summarization candidates present AND Search candidates present | | Let me select specific ones | Always (multi-target runs) | | None — cancel | Always |
If the user chooses "Let me select specific ones", follow up with a multi-select question listing each row of the integration manifest. When a detail-page candidate was flagged in Phase 2 as a related-record-discovery target, include it as a dedicated option (in addition to any Data Summarization option for the same page) so the user can consciously pick the AI-grounded path rather than a hand-rolled OData match — e.g.:
Search Summary on CaseDetail.tsx (finds related KB articles via generative AI)Search Summary on ProductDetail.tsx (finds related products via generative AI)Label the option with the page name and the outcome it produces, not just "Search Summary", so the user sees exactly where the AI surface will appear.
After the user confirms targets, ask per-target follow-up questions only when needed:
scope-extends-beyond-existing-fetch,
needs-definition, or intent-mismatch. Resolve intent-mismatch first because the
chosen target kind decides which scope question (LIST or SINGLE-RECORD) to ask next.Question text, option lists, and the scope-classification → question mapping live in
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/add-ai-webapi/references/scope-classification.md. Read it
when any per-target follow-up is required.
The chosen values flow into the Phase 5 agent-invocation prompt as the Scope for the summary
call block ($filter, $orderby, Scope source, Target's existing list fetch). The
existing UI fetch on the target component stays in place unchanged — the summary URL is an
addition, never a replacement.
If the user picks a scope that adds new $expand targets (e.g., "include its line items"),
re-evaluate the Phase 2 Layer 1/2 delegation decision — the new expansion is a new
prerequisite (Web API enabled + parent-scope permission on the child table).
When the user picks None — cancel:
completed with a (skipped — cancelled by user) suffix in the
activeForm so the task list reads cleanly rather than leaving them stuck pending.--skillName "AddAiWebapi" and an
outcome of cancelled) and Phase 8.2 (present a one-line summary: "No changes made — you
cancelled at the plan-review step")./integrate-webapi,
ai-webapi-integration, ai-webapi-settings-architect, or /deploy-site. Do not commit.Output: user-confirmed integration manifest, or a clean cancellation.
Goal: Ensure every Web API prerequisite for the AI target tables exists, by delegating to
/create-webroles and /integrate-webapi (AI-only read mode) instead of writing Layer 1/2 files
directly.
Skip this entire phase when any of the following is true:
/integrate-webapi? No" — all Layer 1/2 prerequisites
are already on disk from prior runs..powerpages-site does not exist (the sub-skills both require it).In the skip case, proceed to Phase 5 and note this in the final summary.
From Phase 1.6: if no web roles exist in .powerpages-site/web-roles/, or the roles that exist
don't match the site's auth model, ask the user:
| Question | Header | Options |
|----------|--------|---------|
| /integrate-webapi needs at least one web role to attach table permissions to. No matching role was found. Create one now via /create-webroles? | Web role | Yes, create via /create-webroles (Recommended), Skip — I'll handle roles separately |
On Yes: invoke the Skill tool for power-pages:create-webroles with a prompt that
includes the caller-suppress sentinel so the sub-skill does not issue its own deploy
prompts (the orchestrator owns the single end-of-run deploy decision):
[CALLED-BY-PARENT-SKILL] caller=add-ai-webapiCreate web roles for this Power Pages SPA site. The parent skill
/add-ai-webapiwill later attach AI-only read-mode table permissions to the role(s) you create. Do not issue deploy-now prompts — the orchestrator batches the deploy at the end.
Wait for it to complete. Then re-check .powerpages-site/web-roles/ before proceeding to 4.3.
On Skip: this puts the run on a known-broken path — the AI endpoints will return 403 at runtime until the user manually creates a web role + table permissions. Don't fall through silently.
<!-- gate: add-ai-webapi:4.2.skip-webrole | category=consent | cancel-leaves=nothing -->🚦 Gate (consent · add-ai-webapi:4.2.skip-webrole): Explicit acknowledgement before continuing without a web role — skipping leaves Layer 1/2 broken at runtime.
Trigger: User chose "Skip" on the web-role creation offer. Why we ask: Proceeding silently means the AI API endpoints return 403 at runtime; surfacing the trade-off lets the user make an informed stop-vs-continue choice. Cancel leaves: Nothing — no code written yet.
Confirm the trade-off with a second AskUserQuestion:
| Question | Header | Options |
|----------|--------|---------|
| Without a web role I can't set up table permissions, so the AI endpoints will return 403 at runtime until you configure them yourself. Stop here so you can run /create-webroles first, or continue to write the frontend code anyway and let me flag the gap in the final summary? | Continue? | Stop here (Recommended), Continue — write frontend code only and flag the gap in the summary |
On Stop here: end the skill cleanly. Tell the user to run /create-webroles (and optionally
/integrate-webapi) first, then re-invoke /add-ai-webapi.
On Continue: skip the rest of Phase 4 (the /integrate-webapi delegation needs a web role to
attach permissions to, so running 4.3 would fail) and jump to Phase 5. In the Phase 8 summary,
flag the Layer 1/2 gap loudly — list the exact files the user still needs to create
(Webapi/<table>/enabled, Webapi/<table>/fields, table permissions per target) so the path to
a working runtime is obvious from the final message.
/integrate-webapi in AI-only read modeBuild the sentinel arguments from the Phase 2 manifest:
primary=<primary table logical name> (the table whose record / collection is being summarised — e.g., incident, cr4fc_product, cr363_workorder)tables=<primary plus every $expand target, comma-separated>expand-targets=<every $expand target, comma-separated; empty for pure data-summary targets with no $expand>caller=add-ai-webapiInvoke the Skill tool for power-pages:integrate-webapi with a single prompt:
[AI-READ-ONLY] mode=ai-read-only primary=<primary> tables=<list> expand-targets=<list> caller=add-ai-webapiConfigure Layer 1/2 (Web API site settings + table permissions) for the following Power Pages AI summarization targets: <table list>. This is a read-only integration — the
/_api/summarization/data/v1.0/endpoint never mutates Dataverse. Return when all Web API site settings, table permissions, and the sharedpowerPagesApi.tsclient are written to disk.Per the AI-only read-mode contract (your SKILL.md Phase 1.6):
- Do not commit. Skip Phase 4.4 and Phase 6.5 — print the file list you would have committed so this orchestrator can stage it later. The parent skill batches commits.
- Do not deploy. Skip Phase 6.1 deploy ask, Phase 7.3 deploy ask, and Phase 7.4 post-deploy notes. Return the Phase 7.2 summary and stop. The parent skill owns the single end-of-orchestration deploy.
/integrate-webapi detects the [AI-READ-ONLY] sentinel (its Phase 1.6) and runs its full flow
with hardened prompts: read-only table permissions, minimal fields list (no PK, only _<col>_value
for lookups), and a read-only service layer. It still presents plan-mode approval prompts to the
user for each architect — this skill does not suppress those.
Wait for /integrate-webapi to complete. Re-check the file system:
src/shared/powerPagesApi.ts existsWebapi/<table>/enabled exists, Webapi/<table>/fields existsread: true exists; Parent-scope
permission present for every $expand targetIf any prerequisite is still missing, surface this to the user before moving on — something in the delegated flow didn't land (for example, the user declined the architect's plan). Do NOT silently fall back to writing Layer 1/2 files here.
Output: Layer 1/2 prerequisites are on disk; shared powerPagesApi.ts + read-only service
exists; web roles exist.
Goal: Create the AI summarization service and wire it into each target's UI.
ai-webapi-integration agent — first target (sequential)For the first target in the confirmed manifest, invoke the agent at
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/agents/ai-webapi-integration.md via Task. The full prompt
template — every field the agent expects, with notes on which orchestrator phase resolved
each value — lives in
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/add-ai-webapi/references/agent-invocation-prompt.md. Read
that file, copy the template, replace every <…> placeholder with the concrete value for
the current target, and pass it via Task. The agent does not interpret placeholders;
sending the literal text <search | data> will confuse it.
The first call is sequential because it establishes the shared summarization service file
(src/services/aiSummaryService.*) and the CSRF helper that subsequent targets reuse. The
agent returns a structured file-modification list (see its "Return value" section); record
it for Phase 5.5's per-file commit.
Before spawning more agents, verify:
src/services/aiSummaryService.ts).getCsrfToken is defined once in the codebase (or imported from a pre-existing helper).Per plugins/power-pages/AGENTS.md, agent spawning is sequential. Invoke
ai-webapi-integration once per remaining target, waiting for each completion before starting the
next. Each target only adds an independent exported function, a framework wrapper (if not already
present), and wires one UI file — there are no merge conflicts, but the sequential rule keeps
failure modes simple.
If there is only one target total, skip 5.3.
For any placeholder InstructionIdentifier body the Explore agent flagged in Phase 2, the
sub-agent will have replaced them. Confirm by grepping for InstructionIdentifier in the affected
files and verifying each resolved call uses the real entity set and id.
Don't commit automatically — on iterative runs an unprompted git commit here creates a noisy
series of commits for what is effectively one set of changes.
🚦 Gate (consent · add-ai-webapi:5.5.commit): Explicit commit decision after Phase 5 summarization-service + UI wiring is complete.
Trigger: All Phase 5 targets have been wired (service, framework wrapper, UI call sites). Why we ask: Auto-committing on every integration run creates noisy one-commit-per-tweak history; letting the user batch is safer. Cancel leaves: Nothing — source files written; no
git commitfired.
Use AskUserQuestion:
| Question | Header | Options | |----------|--------|---------| | Commit these Layer 3 integration changes now? | Commit | Yes, commit now (Recommended), Skip — I'll commit later |
On Yes: stage only the files modified during Phase 5 — the summarization service,
framework wrapper(s), each wired UI page, and any safe-markdown renderer component the agent
emitted. The orchestrator already has this list from each ai-webapi-integration invocation's
file-modification report. Use explicit git add <path> per file; do not use git add -A —
unrelated work-in-progress files in src/ could otherwise be swept into the commit. Substitute
<targets> in the commit message with a short human-readable list (e.g., CaseDetail and SearchResults,
or 3 pages when there are many):
git add <each file modified by the Phase 5 agents>
git commit -m "Add AI summarization integration for <targets>"
On Skip: proceed without committing. The user will batch the commit themselves at the end.
Output: summarization service + framework wrappers + UI call sites created for every confirmed target.
Goal: Register the Summarization/* site settings via the ai-webapi-settings-architect agent.
Skip this phase when both of the following are true:
Summarization/* site settings;
see ai-api-reference.md).For search-only, remind the user to enable Site search with generative AI (preview) in the site's Copilot workspace after deploy, and proceed to Phase 7.
Phase 1.5 already gated on .powerpages-site existing. Re-check it here as a guard — if it has
disappeared between Phase 1 and now (rare, but possible if the user manually cleaned the folder),
stop and re-run the Phase 1.5 bootstrap-deploy prompt. Do NOT silently fall through into the
architect with a missing folder.
ai-webapi-settings-architectInvoke the agent at ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/agents/ai-webapi-settings-architect.md via Task:
"Analyse this Power Pages SPA site and propose generative-AI summarization site settings. The following Data Summarization targets were integrated in Phase 5: [list each target with its entity set, per-target
InstructionIdentifiervalue, and target kind (single-recordorlist) — the architect needs this to decide onSummarization/Data/ContentSizeLimit]. If any target islist, the plan MUST includeSummarization/Data/ContentSizeLimit=200000— the 100k server default silently truncates list content; this is non-negotiable. Check for existingSummarization/*settings. Layer 1 (Webapi/<table>/*) and Layer 2 (table permissions) were configured in Phase 4 via/integrate-webapiin AI-only read mode — verify they are present on disk and cite them as met in your plan's prerequisite table. Propose the AI plan via plan mode, and on approval create the YAMLs withcreate-site-setting.js."
Wait for the agent to complete. If it reports missing Layer 1/2 prerequisites, something in Phase 4 didn't land — read the file system, identify the gap, and surface it to the user rather than attempting to create Layer 1/2 files here.
🚦 Gate (consent · add-ai-webapi:6.4.commit): Explicit commit decision after
Summarization/*site settings are created by the architect.Trigger:
ai-webapi-settings-architecthas written allSummarization/Data/Enable+Summarization/prompt/<id>YAMLs. Why we ask: Auto-committing could bundle dirty pre-existing YAMLs into the commit; explicit consent scopes the commit to just the architect's output. Cancel leaves: Nothing — YAML files written to disk; nogit commitfired.
Use AskUserQuestion:
| Question | Header | Options |
|----------|--------|---------|
| Commit the new Summarization/* site settings? | Commit | Yes, commit now (Recommended), Skip — I'll commit later |
On Yes: stage only the files the architect just created — use the
filePath list returned by ai-webapi-settings-architect (or the per-file paths printed by
each create-site-setting.js invocation), not a glob. A glob can sweep in pre-existing
Summarization-* YAMLs that are dirty for unrelated reasons (e.g., a prior partial run, or
a maker-edited prompt) and bundle them into the commit by accident.
Use explicit git add <path> per file:
git add <each Summarization-*.sitesetting.yml the architect just wrote>
git commit -m "Add AI summarization site settings"
On Skip: proceed without committing.
Output: Summarization/Data/Enable, Summarization/prompt/<id> settings created.
Goal: Confirm every expected file exists, all POSTs set both required headers, and the project builds.
Preview-feature reminder. A green build doesn't mean the API will return a summary at runtime — admin-level governance (tenant PowerShell, Copilot Hub) or the site-level maker toggle for Search Summary can still block it. See the Preview-feature note at the top of this skill and the admin-hierarchy checklist in
references/ai-api-reference.md§1 "Troubleshooting: AI feature appears disabled". Tell the user now so the post-deploy test isn't a surprise.
For each confirmed target, confirm:
src/services/aiSummaryService.ts (or project-convention equivalent) contains
the expected exported function (fetchSearchSummary or fetchDataSummary; the agent may also
emit a thin wrapper such as fetchCaseSummary when the user picked the support-case scenario).src/hooks/, Vue composable in
src/composables/, or Angular service in src/app/services/.src/shared/powerPagesApi.ts exists when any Data Summarization target was in scope.Summarization/Data/ContentSizeLimit site setting when any list-summary target was
integrated. Grep the source for fetchListSummary — if any match exists, confirm
.powerpages-site/site-settings/Summarization-Data-ContentSizeLimit.sitesetting.yml is
present with value: 200000 (or higher). Missing this setting silently caps list summaries at
the 100k server default and ships the user truncated input. If it's missing, surface the gap
to the user before completing Phase 7 — re-run the architect or create the YAML manually.Grep: "_api/search/v1\\.0/summary|_api/summarization/data/v1\\.0/" in src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx,vue,astro}
For every file that matches, verify the surrounding fetch includes:
__RequestVerificationToken (CSRF token, fetched from /_layout/tokenhtml) — hard ruleX-Requested-With: XMLHttpRequest — recommended (the validator warns when it's missing but
does not block; it matches shell.ajaxSafePost and every other Power Pages POST)For data summarization calls, additionally verify (both hard rules):
$select= (no wildcards)OData-MaxVersion: 4.0 and OData-Version: 4.0 headers are setFix any missing hard-rule header before proceeding. Missing CSRF produces 500s; missing
$select or OData headers produces 403/400s. A missing X-Requested-With only produces a
validator warning — add it for consistency, but it does not break the run.
cd "<PROJECT_ROOT>"
npm run build
Fix any type or import errors. Common issues: missing import of the summarization service in a
wired page; type mismatch between DataSummaryResponse and the UI consumer; duplicate
getCsrfToken declarations (if Phase 5 failed to reuse the existing helper).
| Target file | API | Service fn | Wrapper | UI call site | Headers ✓ | $select ✓ |
|-------------|-----|-----------|---------|--------------|-----------|-------------|
| src/pages/SearchResults.tsx | Search summary | fetchSearchSummary | useSearchSummary | Yes | Yes | n/a |
| src/pages/CaseDetail.tsx | Data summarization | fetchDataSummary (optionally wrapped as fetchCaseSummary) | useCaseSummary | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| src/pages/ProductDetail.tsx | Data summarization | fetchDataSummary | useProductSummary | Yes | Yes | Yes |
(Same row order and example file paths as the Phase 2 manifest example, so a maintainer reading
both tables can trace each row top-to-bottom. Row 2 mirrors the Microsoft-shipped support-case
recipe — a Data Summarization call configured for incidents with the case_summary prompt
identifier.)
Build status: Pass / Fail (with details).
Output: all integration files verified; project builds.
Goal: Record skill usage, present a summary, and offer deployment.
Reference:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/skill-tracking-reference.md
Use --skillName "AddAiWebapi".
| Step | Status | Details |
|------|--------|---------|
| Web roles | Created via /create-webroles / Reused existing / Skipped | role name(s) |
| Layer 1/2 (Web API settings + permissions) | Created via /integrate-webapi / Reused existing / Skipped (search-only) | list of files written |
| Summarization service | Created / Extended | exported functions, file path |
| Framework wrappers | Created / Extended | hook/composable/service paths |
| UI call sites | Wired | list of files |
| Layer 3 (Summarization/* settings) | Created / Already existed / Skipped | Summarization/Data/Enable, one per prompt |
| Question | Header | Options | |----------|--------|---------| | Everything is ready. Deploy the site so the summarization APIs become live? | Deploy | Yes, deploy now (Recommended), No, I'll deploy later |
Yes: invoke /deploy-site.
No: acknowledge. Remind that the API calls will not work until the site is deployed with the
new settings and permissions.
Surface these to the user at the end of the run:
RecommendationConfig. For Search Summary, perform a search and confirm
the summary renders above keyword hits with citation anchors pointing at the SPA route
(not /page-not-found/). The 90041005 "nothing to summarize" branch is normal for the
Microsoft-shipped support-case recipe on a freshly-created case with no comments — test
with a record that has substantive content in every selected / expanded column.90041001 shows up — walk the admin-hierarchy
checklist in references/ai-api-reference.md §1 "Troubleshooting: AI feature appears
disabled (admin hierarchy)". Retry doesn't help; an admin or maker has to change
governance / flip the site toggle.Webapi/<table>/fields, or missing read: true table permission) — re-run
/integrate-webapi in AI-only read mode rather than hand-editing YAML.90041001 … 90041006) is in
references/ai-api-reference.md §2 "Error codes". Open it when the user reports a 400.Output: summary presented, deployment completed or deferred, post-deploy guidance given.
plugins/power-pages/AGENTS.md. Never spawn ai-webapi-integration in parallel across targets (every target extends the same aiSummaryService.* file, so parallel runs would conflict).fetch only./integrate-webapi / /create-webroles. This skill is Layer 3.The list below is the conservative upper bound — many runs hit fewer prompts because skip checks (search-only run, Layer 1/2 ready, no list/intent-mismatch targets) eliminate whole branches. Realistic worst case for a multi-target first-time run is ~10 prompts; a clean re-entry tweak is just 1 prompt (the Phase 1.0 mode question).
/add-ai-webapi run left a
service file or Summarization/* settings on disk..powerpages-site is missing).scope-extends-beyond-existing-fetch,
needs-definition, or intent-mismatch row). Question text and option lists live in
references/scope-classification.md./create-webroles (if needed). The
sub-skill is invoked with the caller-suppress sentinel — its own deploy prompts don't
fire./integrate-webapi delegation: approve its
table-permissions-architect plan and its webapi-settings-architect plan (each
architect owns its own plan-mode prompt; the sub-skill is in AI-only read mode so its
commit and deploy prompts are suppressed).ai-webapi-settings-architect call: approve its plan.When the target is a LIST of records (not a single record), the defaults for a single-record
Copilot card are the wrong defaults — collection endpoint, tabular-insight prompt,
ContentSizeLimit=200000, normalizeSummaryString + safe-markdown renderer, etc.
The full 10-rule playbook (collection endpoint, scope mirroring, prompt size, nav-property
casing, mandatory ContentSizeLimit) lives in
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/add-ai-webapi/references/ai-api-reference.md §2 "List-summary
playbook". Read that section before any list-summary target reaches Phase 5 — the Phase 5
agent and the Phase 6 settings architect both reference the same playbook.
Before starting Phase 1, create a task list with all phases using TaskCreate:
| Task subject | activeForm | Description | |-------------|------------|-------------| | Check site is ready | Checking site prerequisites | Locate project root, detect framework, check data model, deployment status, web-role inventory | | Find where AI summaries fit | Scanning code for AI summary opportunities | Use Explore agent to find search/data/case candidates, existing infra, and delegation decisions | | Confirm what to add | Confirming the AI summary plan | Present manifest and confirm which APIs and targets to integrate | | Set up data access for AI | Setting up Web API access and permissions | Invoke /create-webroles if needed, then /integrate-webapi in AI-only read mode (or skip for search-only) | | Add AI summary code | Adding AI summary code to your pages | Sequential ai-webapi-integration calls: first target creates shared service + CSRF helper, remaining targets extend it | | Register AI prompts | Registering AI prompt settings | Invoke ai-webapi-settings-architect to create Summarization/* settings | | Verify everything | Verifying file inventory, headers, and the build | Confirm service file, wrappers, UI wiring, header contract, run project build | | Review and deploy | Reviewing summary and deploying | Record skill usage, present summary, offer /deploy-site, give post-deploy guidance |
Mark each task in_progress when starting and completed when done via TaskUpdate.
Begin with Phase 1: Verify Site Exists
testing
Use this skill when the user wants to enable, disable, turn on or off, opt out of, opt in to, or check the status of power-pages telemetry / anonymous usage data. Triggers: "disable telemetry", "turn off telemetry", "opt out of telemetry", "stop collecting usage data", "enable telemetry", "telemetry status".
tools
Sets up a Power Platform Pipeline for automated Power Pages deployments. Power Platform Pipelines is Microsoft's native CI/CD tool built into the Power Platform — no external infrastructure required. Use when asked to: "set up ci/cd", "create pipeline", "setup pipeline", "set up power platform pipelines", "create power pipelines", "automate deployments", "set up automated deployment", "create deployment pipeline", "use power pipelines". Also handles: "set up github actions" or "set up azure devops pipeline" (shows coming-soon guidance for those platforms).
development
Runs a guided, end-to-end security review of a Power Pages site and consolidates every finding into one HTML report covering the live site, browser headers, firewall, authentication, and role-based permissions. Use when the user wants a full security review, a release-readiness check before publishing, an access-and-config check during development, live site monitoring, or asks open-ended questions like "review my site security", "is my site safe to ship", "do a security check", "monitor my site" — even if they do not name the individual checks.
testing
Runs a security scan on a deployed Power Pages site, fetches the latest scan report, and produces a plain-language summary. Scans the live site's public surface for vulnerabilities and surfaces issues by severity. Use when the user wants to scan, check, test, audit, or assess a published site, find vulnerabilities on production, view the latest scan report, see previous scan results, run a security audit, or asks "how safe is my live site?", "is my site vulnerable?", "audit my production site" — even if they say "find issues" or "check for problems" without mentioning "scan" or "security".