skills/team/rust-security-review/SKILL.md
OWASP-based security review of Rust applications with a memory-safety `unsafe` audit. Detects the crates, async runtime, and entry points, scans against the OWASP Top 10 (2025) mapped to Rust patterns (injection, unsafe-block memory safety, panic/DoS, deserialization, crypto, secrets), runs cargo-audit and cargo-deny for evidence, and produces a manager-friendly executive summary plus a graded technical findings table. Use to audit Rust code for vulnerabilities. Triggers on "rust security review", "audit rust vulnerabilities", "cargo audit", "unsafe audit rust", "OWASP rust", "rust security scan". For federal / gov / DOE / NIST / FIPS / CUI context, run security-review-federal after this base review. Do NOT use to grade architecture/structure — use rust-architecture-checklist.
npx skillsauth add michaelalber/ai-toolkit rust-security-reviewInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
"Security is not a product, but a process." — Bruce Schneier
Shared across the dotnet / python / php / rust security reviews — same values, language-specific threats.
| # | Value | What it means |
|---|-------|---------------|
| 1 | Validate at boundaries | Every external input validated and typed at the edge (serde + validation); never trust client data. |
| 2 | Parameterized queries only | No format!-built SQL; sqlx/diesel bound parameters everywhere. |
| 3 | Secrets out of code | No hardcoded secrets; env / secret-manager; never logged (beware Debug on secret structs). |
| 4 | Authn/authz at every boundary | Auth middleware / extractors server-side at each trust boundary; deny by default. |
| 5 | Least privilege & safe defaults | Minimal permissions; secure defaults; fail closed. |
| 6 | Protect data in transit & at rest | No sensitive data (passwords, tokens, PII) in logs; TLS (rustls); encryption at rest. |
| 7 | Dependencies pinned & audited | cargo audit + cargo deny in CI; supply chain reviewed. |
| 8 | Evidence-based, graded findings | Every finding cites file:line + OWASP category + severity; report is graded and manager-readable. |
Shared skeleton: DETECT → SCAN → EXECUTIVE SUMMARY → GRADED FINDINGS.
DETECT Crates (web framework, DB driver, crypto), async runtime, and entry points (handlers, FFI,
CLI). Enumerate every `unsafe` block — it is the memory-safety attack surface.
SCAN Walk the Rust Threat Checklist below, one OWASP category at a time. Gather evidence:
cargo audit # RustSec CVEs
cargo deny check # licenses, bans, advisories
grep -rn "unsafe \|\.unwrap()\|\.expect(\|format!(.*SELECT\|transmute" src/
Every issue becomes a finding with file:line, OWASP category, and severity.
EXEC SUMMARY Manager-friendly: risk grade, count by severity, top 3 risks in plain language.
FINDINGS Technical table: severity · location · OWASP · finding · remediation.
| OWASP (2025) | Rust check | Severity signal |
|---|---|---|
| A01 Broken Access Control | Auth extractor/middleware on every protected route; object-level checks (no IDOR); deny by default | Critical |
| A02 Cryptographic Failures | ring/rustls/RustCrypto — no hand-rolled crypto; getrandom for tokens; Argon2/bcrypt for passwords; no MD5/SHA1 for security | High |
| A03 Injection | sqlx/diesel bound params (no format! into SQL); std::process::Command with explicit args, never a shell string from input | Critical |
| A04 Memory Safety (unsafe audit) | Every unsafe block has a correct // SAFETY: comment; no transmute of untrusted data; raw-pointer and FFI buffer bounds checked; no out-of-bounds / use-after-free | Critical |
| A04 Denial of Service | No .unwrap()/.expect()/panic! on user input (thread crash/DoS); bounded allocations; checked_/saturating_ math on security-sensitive arithmetic | High |
| A06 Vulnerable Components | cargo audit clean (RustSec); cargo deny advisories/bans enforced | High |
| A08 Integrity / Deserialization | serde on untrusted input bounded and validated; untagged/deny_unknown_fields considered; no unbounded recursion | High |
| A09 Logging Failures | Secrets not exposed via Debug/Display; no tokens/PII in logs | Medium |
| A10 SSRF | Outbound URLs from user input validated/allow-listed | High |
Full per-category checklist: owasp rust checklist · unsafe audit method: unsafe audit guide.
<security-review-state>
language: rust
mode: DETECT | SCAN | EXEC-SUMMARY | FINDINGS | COMPLETE
detected: [crates | runtime | entry points | unsafe_blocks:N]
owasp_covered: [A01..A10 progress]
findings: [critical:N high:N medium:N low:N]
last_action: [what was just done]
next_action: [what should happen next]
</security-review-state>
Shared across all four security reviews.
## Security Review: [crate] (Rust)
**Runtime**: [Tokio/async-std] | **unsafe blocks**: [N] | **Risk grade**: [A–F]
### Executive Summary (manager-friendly)
[2–3 sentences: overall posture, the most serious risk in plain language, recommended next step.]
Findings: Critical [N] · High [N] · Medium [N] · Low [N]
### Technical Findings
| Severity | Location | OWASP | Finding | Remediation |
|----------|----------|-------|---------|-------------|
| CRITICAL | file:line | A04 | [pattern] | [fix] |
### `unsafe` Audit
| Location | SAFETY comment | Quality | Risk |
|----------|----------------|---------|------|
**Top 3 priorities**: 1. … 2. … 3. …
Risk grade: A no critical/high · B no critical, ≤2 high · C no critical, multiple high ·
D 1+ critical · F systemic (unjustified unsafe + injection + secrets in code).
file:line and the OWASP category. No speculative findings.unsafe is the security surface. Memory safety holds only outside unsafe; audit every block for a correct // SAFETY: invariant — a missing or wrong one is Critical.panic on input is a DoS finding, not just a robustness nit, in a service that must stay up.rust-architecture-checklist — note and route.security-review-federal after this base review.security-review-federal — Federal/gov overlay (NIST 800-53, FIPS, CUI, POA&M) applied on top of this base review.rust-architecture-checklist — Companion for structure/maintainability (also audits unsafe for correctness); run first for context.supply-chain-audit — Deeper dependency/CVE and license analysis beyond cargo audit.dotnet / python / php-security-review — Sibling skills sharing this exact Core Values + workflow + output.development
Federal / government security overlay applied ON TOP OF a base language security review (dotnet/python/php/rust/react). Language-agnostic: adds NIST SP 800-53 control mapping, FIPS 140-2/3 cryptographic compliance (with a per-language crypto table), CUI handling, EO 14028 supply-chain requirements, and DOE Order 205.1B, and emits POA&M-ready findings with FIPS 199 impact levels. Use for federal/DOE/DOD/national-laboratory systems. Triggers on "federal security review", "NIST compliance", "NIST 800-53", "FISMA", "CUI", "FIPS audit", "DOE security", "POA&M", "ATO review". Do NOT use alone — run the matching <lang>-security-review FIRST; this overlay maps and extends it.
tools
OWASP-based security review of React / TypeScript front-end applications. Detects the framework (Vite/CRA/Next), entry points, and data flows, scans against the OWASP Top 10 (2025) mapped to React client-side patterns (XSS via raw HTML, URL/protocol injection, secrets in the bundle, insecure token storage, dependency CVEs, missing CSP, open redirects), and produces a manager-friendly executive summary plus a graded technical findings table. Use to audit React code for vulnerabilities. Triggers on "react security review", "frontend security audit", "audit react for vulnerabilities", "owasp react", "react xss", "react security posture", "npm audit review". For federal / gov / DOE / NIST / FIPS / CUI context, run security-review-federal after this base review. Do NOT use to grade architecture/structure — use react-architecture-checklist.
tools
Analyzes legacy React codebases and produces actionable modernization plans. Primary migration paths include class components to function components + hooks, Create React App to Vite, React 16/17 to 18 to 19, JavaScript to TypeScript, Enzyme to React Testing Library, legacy Redux to Redux Toolkit / Zustand / Context, and deprecated lifecycle/API removal. Does NOT perform the migration — assesses, quantifies risk, and plans. Triggers on phrases like "modernize react", "class to hooks", "upgrade react", "migrate CRA to vite", "react legacy migration", "react 17 to 18", "react js to typescript", "react technical debt", "enzyme to RTL".
development
Scaffolds feature-based React / TypeScript architecture using feature folders, presentational + container components, custom hooks, a typed data layer, and structural CQRS (query hooks vs mutation hooks). React analog of dotnet-vertical-slice and python-feature-slice — no DI framework; uses props/context for dependency injection and a query cache for server state. Use when creating feature-based React projects, adding React features, organizing components by feature rather than by technical type, or scaffolding a feature's data layer. Triggers on phrases like "scaffold react feature", "create react slice", "react feature folder", "react vertical slice", "add react feature", "react feature architecture", "organize react by feature".