lyndonkl/symmetry-discovery-questionnaire
skills/symmetry-discovery-questionnaire/SKILL.md
Guides collaborative discovery of hidden symmetries in ML data through structured domain analysis, coordinate system examination, transformation testing, and physical constraint identification. No group theory knowledge required. Use when ML engineers need to identify symmetries in their data, when user mentions data symmetry, invariance discovery, what transformations matter, or needs help recognizing patterns their model should respect.
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add lyndonkl/claude symmetry-discovery-questionnaireInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: Apr 20, 2026, 6:28 AM6.4s4 files scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- symmetry-discovery-questionnaire
- description:
- Guides collaborative discovery of hidden symmetries in ML data through structured domain analysis, coordinate system examination, transformation testing, and physical constraint identification. No group theory knowledge required. Use when ML engineers need to identify symmetries in their data, when user mentions data symmetry, invariance discovery, what transformations matter, or needs help recognizing patterns their model should respect.
Symmetry Discovery Questionnaire
Workflow
Copy this checklist and track your progress:
Symmetry Discovery Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Classify your domain and data type
- [ ] Step 2: Analyze coordinate system choices
- [ ] Step 3: Test candidate transformations
- [ ] Step 4: Analyze physical constraints
- [ ] Step 5: Determine output behavior under transformations
- [ ] Step 6: Document symmetry candidates
Step 1: Classify your domain and data type
Ask user what their primary data type is. Use this table to identify likely symmetries and guide further questions. Images (2D grids) → likely translation, rotation, reflection. 3D data (point clouds, meshes) → likely SE(3), E(3). Molecules → E(3) + permutation + point groups. Graphs/Networks → permutation. Sets → permutation. Time series → time-translation, periodicity. Tabular → rarely symmetric. Physical systems → conservation laws imply symmetries. For detailed worked examples by domain, consult Domain Examples.
Step 2: Analyze coordinate system choices
Guide user through coordinate analysis questions: Is there a preferred origin? (NO → translation invariance). Is there a preferred orientation? (NO → rotation invariance). Is there a preferred handedness? (NO → reflection invariance). Is there a preferred scale? (NO → scale invariance). Is element ordering meaningful? (NO → permutation invariance). Document each answer with reasoning.
Step 3: Test candidate transformations
For each candidate transformation T, ask: "If I transform my input by T, should my output change?" If NO → invariance to T. If YES predictably → equivariance to T. If YES unpredictably → no symmetry. Use domain-specific checklists from Domain Transformation Tests. Test all relevant transformations systematically. For the detailed methodology behind this testing approach, see Methodology.
Step 4: Analyze physical constraints
Ask about conservation laws and physical symmetries. Noether's theorem: every conservation law implies a symmetry. Energy conserved → time-translation symmetry. Momentum conserved → space-translation symmetry. Angular momentum conserved → rotation symmetry. Ask: Are there physical conservation laws? Is system isolated from external reference frames? Are there gauge freedoms?
Step 5: Determine output behavior under transformations
Critical question: When input transforms, how should output transform? Classification labels → stay same (invariance). Bounding boxes → move with object (equivariance). Force vectors → rotate with system (equivariance). Scalar properties → stay same (invariance). Segmentation masks → transform with image (equivariance). This determines whether you need invariant or equivariant architecture.
Step 6: Document symmetry candidates
Create summary using Output Template. List identified symmetries with confidence levels. Note uncertain cases that need empirical validation. Identify non-symmetries (transformations that DO matter). Recommend next steps for validation and formalization. Quality criteria for this output are defined in Quality Rubric.
Domain Transformation Tests
Image Symmetries
| Transformation | Test Question | If NO → | |----------------|---------------|---------| | Translation | Does object position matter for label? | Translation invariance | | Rotation (90°) | Would rotated image have same label? | C4 symmetry | | Rotation (any) | Would any rotation preserve label? | SO(2) symmetry | | Horizontal flip | Would mirror image have same label? | Reflection | | Scale | Would zoomed image have same label? | Scale invariance |
3D Data Symmetries
| Transformation | Test Question | If NO → | |----------------|---------------|---------| | 3D Translation | Does absolute position matter? | Translation invariance | | 3D Rotation | Does orientation matter? | SO(3) or SE(3) | | Reflection | Does handedness matter? | O(3) or E(3) | | Point permutation | Does point ordering matter? | Permutation invariance |
Graph Symmetries
| Transformation | Test Question | If NO → | |----------------|---------------|---------| | Node relabeling | Does node ID matter, or just connectivity? | Permutation invariance |
Molecular Symmetries
| Transformation | Test Question | If NO → | |----------------|---------------|---------| | Rotation | Is property independent of orientation? | SO(3) | | Translation | Is property independent of position? | Translation | | Reflection | Are both enantiomers equivalent? | Include reflections | | Atom permutation | Do identical atoms behave identically? | Permutation |
Temporal Symmetries
| Transformation | Test Question | If NO → | |----------------|---------------|---------| | Time shift | Can pattern occur at any time? | Time-translation | | Time reversal | Is forward same as backward? | Time-reversal | | Periodicity | Do patterns repeat with period T? | Cyclic symmetry |
Quick Reference
The 5 Key Questions:
- Is there a preferred coordinate system? (origin, orientation, scale)
- Does element ordering matter?
- What transformations leave the label unchanged?
- What physical constraints apply?
- How should outputs transform when inputs transform?
Common Symmetry → Group Mapping:
- Rotation (2D, discrete) → Cyclic group Cₙ
- Rotation + reflection (2D) → Dihedral group Dₙ
- Rotation (2D, continuous) → SO(2)
- Rotation (3D) → SO(3)
- Rotation + translation (3D) → SE(3)
- Full Euclidean (3D) → E(3)
- Permutation → Symmetric group Sₙ
Output Template
SYMMETRY CANDIDATE SUMMARY
==========================
Domain: [Data type]
Task: [Classification/Regression/Detection/etc.]
IDENTIFIED SYMMETRIES:
1. [Transformation]: [Invariance/Equivariance]
- Evidence: [Why you believe this]
- Confidence: [High/Medium/Low]
2. [Transformation]: [Invariance/Equivariance]
- Evidence: [Why you believe this]
- Confidence: [High/Medium/Low]
UNCERTAIN SYMMETRIES (need validation):
- [Transformation]: [Reason for uncertainty]
NON-SYMMETRIES (transformations that DO matter):
- [Transformation]: [Why it matters]
NEXT STEPS:
- Empirically validate uncertain symmetry candidates
- Map confirmed symmetries to mathematical groups
- Design architecture based on validated group structure
Related Skills
lyndonkl/skills/zettel-note
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
--- name: zettel-note description: The note-writing discipline for this vault's evergreen knowledge graph, modeled on a Zettelkasten reading companion and governed by the vault conventions. Enforces declarative-claim titles, one claim per note (atomicity), own-words prose with no block quotes, the piped [[slug|Title]] link form, the labeled link-relationship vocabulary (Confirms/Contradicts/Extends/Context/Prerequisite/Builds-on/Applies/Example-of/Contrasts-with), 3-6 links per note, and search-
119SKILL.mdUpdated Jun 12, 2026
lyndonkl/wc-transfer-planner
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Plans between-round FIFA World Cup Fantasy transfers — budgets the round's free transfer(s), forces out players whose nation has been eliminated, chases fixture-swing drops, upgrades on value, and decides when a rebuild is large enough to fire the Wildcard instead of spending free transfers one at a time. Ranks candidate in/out pairs by EV gain over each player's remaining survival horizon (delta xEV weighted by progression_carry) MINUS transfer cost (a free transfer is cheap, a points hit is real, churning the squad for marginal swings is a critic flag), and tags forced/fixture/upgrade priority. Emits a `transfer-plan` signal. Use when called by wc-squad-architect (whose transfer work this skill is the engine for) and by the strategists in the populate stage when their candidate is transfer-adjacent rather than a full rebuild.
119SKILL.mdUpdated Jun 12, 2026
lyndonkl/wc-tournament-state
testing
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Reads and updates the FIFA World Cup Fantasy tournament state machine (footballfantasy/context/tournament-state.md) — the temporal backbone tracking phase (pre-tournament → group MD1-3 → R32 → R16 → QF → SF → final), budget ($100m group / $105m knockouts), nation cap (3 group, loosening in knockouts), chips remaining, surviving nations, each owned player's elimination-risk horizon, and deadlines. Validates state on load (count/feasibility checks), applies phase transitions, and appends to the append-only state log (never silent overwrite). Use to load state at the start of a run and to commit state changes after the manager makes a move.
119SKILL.mdUpdated Jun 12, 2026
lyndonkl/wc-signal-emitter
development
VerifiedTrustedCommunity
Validates and persists FIFA World Cup Fantasy signal files to signals/YYYY-MM-DD-<type>.md. Checks the required frontmatter (type, round, date, emitted_by, confidence, source_urls), range-checks declared numeric signals, confirms every factual claim carries a source URL or "manager-provided", rejects unknown signal types, and refuses to persist a signal that fails validation (logging the failure instead). Keeps the inter-agent signal layer auditable so downstream agents can trust what they read and never re-derive it. Use whenever an agent or skill writes a signal.
119SKILL.mdUpdated Jun 12, 2026