lyndonkl/adr-architecture

Architecture Decision Records (ADR)

Table of Contents

• Workflow
  • 1. Understand the Decision
  • 2. Choose ADR Template
  • 3. Document the Decision
  • 4. Validate Quality
  • 5. Deliver and File
• Common Patterns
• Guardrails
• Quick Reference

Each ADR captures: Context (what situation necessitates this decision), Decision (what we're choosing), Alternatives (other options considered), Consequences (trade-offs and implications), and Status (proposed, accepted, deprecated, superseded).

Quick Example:

# ADR-042: Use PostgreSQL for Primary Database

**Status:** Accepted
**Date:** 2024-01-15
**Deciders:** Backend team, CTO

## Context
Need to select primary database for new microservices platform.
Requirements: ACID transactions, complex queries, 10k+ QPS at launch.

## Decision
Use PostgreSQL 15+ as primary relational database.

## Alternatives Considered
- MySQL: Weaker JSON support, less robust constraint handling
- MongoDB: No ACID across documents, eventual consistency issues
- CockroachDB: Excellent but adds operational complexity we can't support yet

## Consequences
✓ Strong consistency and data integrity
✓ Excellent JSON support for semi-structured data
✓ Team has deep PostgreSQL experience
✗ Vertical scaling limits (will need read replicas at 50k+ QPS)
✗ More complex to shard than DynamoDB if we need it

Workflow

Copy this checklist and track your progress:

ADR Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Understand the decision
- [ ] Step 2: Choose ADR template
- [ ] Step 3: Document the decision
- [ ] Step 4: Validate quality
- [ ] Step 5: Deliver and file

Step 1: Understand the decision

Gather decision context: what decision needs to be made, why now, who decides, constraints (budget, timeline, skills, compliance), requirements (functional, non-functional, business), and scope (one service vs organization-wide). This ensures the ADR addresses the right problem.

Step 2: Choose ADR template

For technology selection (frameworks, libraries, databases) → Use resources/template.md. For complex architectural decisions with multiple interdependent choices → Study resources/methodology.md. To see examples → Review resources/examples/ (database-selection.md, microservices-migration.md, api-versioning.md).

Step 3: Document the decision

Create adr-{number}-{short-title}.md with: clear title, metadata (status, date, deciders), context (situation and requirements), decision (specific and actionable), alternatives considered (with pros/cons), consequences (trade-offs, risks, benefits), implementation notes if relevant, and links to related ADRs. See Common Patterns for decision-type specific guidance.

Step 4: Validate quality

Self-check using resources/evaluators/rubric_adr_architecture.json. Verify: context explains WHY, decision is specific and actionable, 2-3+ alternatives documented with trade-offs, consequences include benefits AND drawbacks, technical details accurate, understandable to unfamiliar readers, honest about downsides. Minimum standard: Score ≥ 3.5 (aim for 4.5+ if controversial/high-impact).

Step 5: Deliver and file

Present the completed ADR file, highlight key trade-offs identified, suggest ADR numbering if not provided, recommend review process for high-stakes decisions, and note any follow-up decisions needed. Filing convention: Store ADRs in docs/adr/ or architecture/decisions/ directory with sequential numbering.

Common Patterns

For technology selection:

• Focus on technical capabilities vs requirements
• Include performance benchmarks if available
• Document team expertise level
• Consider operational complexity

For architectural changes:

• Include migration strategy in consequences
• Document backward compatibility impact
• Consider team velocity impact during transition
• Note monitoring and rollback plans

For standards and conventions:

• Include examples of the standard in practice
• Document exceptions or escape hatches
• Consider enforcement mechanisms
• Note educational/onboarding implications

For deprecations:

• Set status to "Deprecated" or "Superseded"
• Link to superseding ADR
• Document sunset timeline
• Include migration guide

Guardrails

Do:

• Be honest about trade-offs (every choice has downsides)
• Write for future readers who lack current context
• Include specific technical details (versions, configurations)
• Acknowledge uncertainty and risks
• Keep ADRs immutable (status changes, but content doesn't)
• Write one ADR per decision (focused scope)

Don't:

• Make decisions sound better than they are
• Omit alternatives that were seriously considered
• Use jargon without explanation
• Write vague consequences ("might improve performance")
• Revisit/edit old ADRs (write new superseding ADR instead)
• Combine multiple independent decisions in one ADR

Quick Reference

• Standard template: resources/template.md
• Complex decisions: resources/methodology.md
• Examples: resources/examples/database-selection.md, resources/examples/microservices-migration.md, resources/examples/api-versioning.md
• Quality rubric: resources/evaluators/rubric_adr_architecture.json

ADR Naming Convention: adr-{number}-{short-kebab-case-title}.md

• Example: adr-042-use-postgresql-for-primary-database.md