liatrio-labs/git-commit-conventional

Git Commit Conventional

Overview

Generate clear Conventional Commit messages, decide commit grouping, run commit-time checks, and create commit(s) safely.

Context Marker

Always begin your response with all active emoji markers, in the order they were introduced.

Format: "<marker1><marker2><marker3>\n<response>"

The marker for this skill is: 🎯

Workflow

1. Inspect repository context:

   • Run git log -n 20 --pretty=format:%s for subject style context only.
   • Run git status.

2. Select the diff to analyze:

   • If staged changes exist, use git diff --staged and ignore unstaged changes.
   • If nothing is staged, run git diff and ask whether to stage all or specific files before committing.

3. Evaluate commit pressure using balanced thresholds:

   • Count changed files and changed lines from the active diff context.
   • Classify zone:
     • green: <=5 files and <=150 changed lines.
     • yellow: 6-12 files or 151-400 changed lines.
     • red: >12 files or >400 changed lines.
   • Apply zone behavior:
     • green: proceed with normal commit boundary analysis.
     • yellow: recommend splitting and record a risk note if user chooses a single commit.
     • red: require a split plan before proceeding; only continue single-commit flow with explicit user override.

4. Decide single versus multiple commits with an explicit framework:

   • Check logical separation: split when changes serve multiple distinct goals.
   • Check file-type mixing: split documentation changes from code changes when they can stand alone.
   • Check implementation versus tests: split when test updates are independent from implementation updates.
   • Check formatting versus logic: split formatting-only churn from behavior changes.
   • Check dependencies versus behavior: split dependency and tooling updates from code behavior changes.
   • Check mixed-purpose hunks in the same file: split by hunk when one file contains unrelated intents (for example, rename plus refactor).
   • Check size and reviewability: consider splitting broad changes (for example, over roughly 150 changed lines) by module or feature.
   • Check issue/feature boundaries: split when multiple bugs or features are addressed in one diff.
   • Keep together when changes are small and focused on one purpose.
   • Keep together when changes are tightly coupled and splitting would create non-functional or misleading history.
   • Keep together when all changes are part of one coherent refactor.

5. Stage changes intentionally for the selected commit boundary:

   • Use git add -p to stage only relevant hunks when a file mixes logical changes.
   • Use git add -e only when hunk editing is required and apply minimal edits.
   • After staging, verify scope with git diff --staged and git diff before proceeding.
   • If partial staging would create a broken intermediate commit, keep dependent hunks together.

6. Run a concise quality review before committing:

   • Check correctness, maintainability, security, performance, and tests.
   • Classify findings by severity: Critical, High, Medium, Low.
   • Present findings using this structure: Executive Summary; Issues by severity with file/line references; Suggested fixes with brief examples; Positive observations; Actionable next steps.
   • If any Critical or High issue is found, stop and request explicit user confirmation before committing.

7. If .pre-commit-config.yaml exists, run pre-commit run:

   • Never bypass hooks.
   • For trivial fixes, apply changes, restage files, and rerun hooks with a max of 2 retries.
   • Stop retrying when hooks pass, when retries are exhausted, or when reruns make no additional file changes.
   • If hooks still fail after retries, stop and ask the user for direction.
   • For non-trivial fixes, present the proposed fix to the user and get approval before applying and proceeding.
   • Treat formatting-only or whitespace-only hook edits as trivial auto-fixes.
   • Track every auto-fixed file and the hook that changed it.

8. Generate commit message(s) in strict Conventional Commit format:

   • Subject must match <type>(<scope>): <subject> or <type>: <subject>.
   • If subject format is invalid, regenerate until format is valid.
   • Keep subject imperative and concise.
   • If the change is breaking, use ! and add explicit breaking-change explanation in the body and/or footer (BREAKING CHANGE: ...).
   • Include body to document context and rationale.
   • Only exclude a body when the changes are very, very small.

9. Apply AI attribution policy before each commit:

   • Always include a footer-only Co-Authored-By attribution on agent-created commits.
   • Never mention AI generation in the subject or body.
   • Use best effort self-identification to determine AI name and email from runtime/model self-awareness metadata.
   • If email is not readily available, use [email protected].
   • If name is not readily available, use AI Assistant.
   • Never block commit flow by asking the user for attribution identity.

10. Use deterministic output contract for single-commit and multi-commit runs:

    • Before committing, present Commit Plan:
      • commit_count
      • threshold_zone_encountered
      • boundaries_rationale
      • scope_per_commit
    • Before each commit, present Per-Commit Preview:
      • index (i/N)
      • staged_files
      • subject
      • body_present
      • footers
      • checks_to_run
    • After each commit, present Per-Commit Result:
      • hash
      • subject
      • hook_result
      • auto_fix_files

11. Validate message format and create commit(s):

    • Show generated message(s) in chat.
    • Run git commit with the generated message(s).
    • For multiple commits, stage the right files before each commit.
    • In the final commit summary to the user, include:
      • Ordered <hash> <subject> list.
      • Pre-commit changes note:
        • If auto-fixes were applied, list hook id(s) and file path(s).
        • If none were applied, explicitly say Pre-commit changes: none.
      • ai_attribution_applied: yes/no.
      • working_tree_status: clean/not clean.

Mandatory Rules

• Never use hook bypass flags such as --no-verify or -n.
• Never commit when Critical or High review issues are present unless the user explicitly confirms.
• Never include unrelated files in a commit.
• Never stage an entire file when only some hunks belong to the current commit boundary.
• Always report whether pre-commit auto-fixed files before finalizing the commit result message.

References

• Conventional commit types, scopes, and templates: references/conventional-commits.md
• Review severity rubric and reporting format: references/review-guardrails.md
• Commit pressure zones and threshold behavior: references/commit-hygiene-thresholds.md
• AI attribution policy for commits: references/ai-attribution.md