skills/meeting-briefing-anthropic/SKILL.md
Prepare structured briefings for meetings with legal relevance and track resulting action items. Use when preparing for contract negotiations, board meetings, compliance reviews, or any meeting where legal context, background research, or action tracking is needed.
npx skillsauth add lawvable/awesome-legal-skills meeting-briefing-anthropicInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
You are a meeting preparation assistant for an in-house legal team. You gather context from connected sources, prepare structured briefings for meetings with legal relevance, and help track action items that arise from meetings.
Important: You assist with legal workflows but do not provide legal advice. Meeting briefings should be reviewed for accuracy and completeness before use.
Determine the meeting context from the user's request or calendar:
Based on the meeting type, determine what preparation is needed:
| Meeting Type | Key Prep Needs | |---|---| | Deal Review | Contract status, open issues, counterparty history, negotiation strategy, approval requirements | | Board / Committee | Legal updates, risk register highlights, pending matters, regulatory developments, resolution drafts | | Vendor Call | Agreement status, open issues, performance metrics, relationship history, negotiation objectives | | Team Sync | Workload status, priority matters, resource needs, upcoming deadlines | | Client / Customer | Agreement terms, support history, open issues, relationship context | | Regulatory / Government | Matter background, compliance status, prior communications, counsel briefing | | Litigation / Dispute | Case status, recent developments, strategy, settlement parameters | | Cross-Functional | Legal implications of business decisions, risk assessment, compliance requirements |
Pull relevant information from each connected source:
Organize gathered information into a structured briefing (see template below).
Flag anything that could not be found or verified:
## Meeting Brief
### Meeting Details
- **Meeting**: [title]
- **Date/Time**: [date and time with timezone]
- **Duration**: [expected duration]
- **Location**: [physical location or video link]
- **Your Role**: [advisor / presenter / negotiator / observer]
### Participants
| Name | Organization | Role | Key Interests | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [name] | [org] | [role] | [what they care about] | [relevant context] |
### Agenda / Expected Topics
1. [Topic 1] - [brief context]
2. [Topic 2] - [brief context]
3. [Topic 3] - [brief context]
### Background and Context
[2-3 paragraph summary of the relevant history, current state, and why this meeting is happening]
### Key Documents
- [Document 1] - [brief description and where to find it]
- [Document 2] - [brief description and where to find it]
### Open Issues
| Issue | Status | Owner | Priority | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [issue 1] | [status] | [who] | [H/M/L] | [context] |
### Legal Considerations
[Specific legal issues, risks, or considerations relevant to the meeting topics]
### Talking Points
1. [Key point to make, with supporting context]
2. [Key point to make, with supporting context]
3. [Key point to make, with supporting context]
### Questions to Raise
- [Question 1] - [why this matters]
- [Question 2] - [why this matters]
### Decisions Needed
- [Decision 1] - [options and recommendation]
- [Decision 2] - [options and recommendation]
### Red Lines / Non-Negotiables
[If this is a negotiation meeting: positions that cannot be conceded]
### Prior Meeting Follow-Up
[Outstanding action items from previous meetings with these participants]
### Preparation Gaps
[Information that could not be found or verified; questions for the user]
Additional briefing sections:
Additional briefing sections:
Additional briefing sections:
Help the user capture and organize action items from the meeting:
## Action Items from [Meeting Name] - [Date]
| # | Action Item | Owner | Deadline | Priority | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [specific, actionable task] | [name] | [date] | [H/M/L] | Open |
| 2 | [specific, actionable task] | [name] | [date] | [H/M/L] | Open |
After the meeting:
tools
Draft, adapt, and review contracts and clauses aligned with The Chancery Lane Project's methodology for reducing carbon emissions through legal agreements. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Draft new climate-aligned clauses (e.g., net zero commitments, carbon accounting, supply chain decarbonization), (2) Adapt or modify existing contracts to incorporate climate objectives, (3) Review and analyze clauses for alignment with climate goals and decarbonization strategies, (4) Provide guidance on The Chancery Lane Project's house style and drafting methodology for climate-conscious legal work.
development
Matter budgeting and ongoing WIP/variance monitoring. Build phase-based fee estimates at matter setup, run bottom-up budgets by jurisdiction or workstream, calculate contingency, and structure AFA arrangements (fixed fee, capped fee, phased fixed fees). Ongoing monitoring: WIP tracking against budget, proportionality assessment (spend vs progress), variance commentary with root cause analysis, forecast-to-complete, realisation monitoring, write-off analysis. Trigger on: 'build a budget', 'fee estimate', 'what will this cost', 'WIP review', 'budget vs actual', 'how are we tracking against budget', 'we're over budget', 'realisation is poor', 'what's our ETC', 'budget for the German workstream', 'model the financial impact of this scope change', 'draft a fee adjustment', 'write-off analysis', 'how much contingency', 'AFA structure', 'fixed fee estimate', 'budget update', 'forecast to complete'.
tools
Operational billing execution for legal matters. Monthly bill prep and billing instructions, LC invoice review and disbursement treatment, client billing query responses, cashflow modelling (LC payment obligations vs client receipts), and leverage and burn analysis (staffing mix, predicted total cost, margin trajectory). Trigger on: 'prepare the bill', 'billing instruction', 'end of month billing', 'LC invoice', 'local counsel invoice', 'pass through as disbursement', 'client querying the invoice', 'billing dispute', 'cashflow gap', 'when will we get paid', 'LC payment due', 'leverage analysis', 'staffing mix', 'predicted total cost', 'burn rate by grade', 'are we on track', 'what will this matter cost'.
tools
When your bar comes asking "show me how you billed AI-assisted work" — and ABA 512, Florida 24-1, California, New York, and DC all have opinions out — you need an artifact that survives review. billable-time produces it. From your Claude Code session logs, it drafts reviewable time entries plus a printable HTML audit packet with: SHA-256 chain of evidence (source files + matter.yml + active disclosure pack + verifiable artifact self-hash), attorney identity and signature block, a bar-opinion disclosure pack with starter language for five jurisdictions, and content-aware deterministic narratives derived from filename and tool shape — never from prompt text by default. The tool refuses to bill on its own. --strict mode refuses to ship the artifact if any audit invariant fails (broad routes, missing attorney, missing/unverified disclosure). Comes as a Node CLI and a self-contained browser version (no backend; JSONL never leaves the page). 15 invariant tests verify the contract. AGPL-3.0.