skills/canned-responses-anthropic/SKILL.md
Generate templated responses for common legal inquiries and identify when situations require individualized attention. Use when responding to routine legal questions — data subject requests, vendor inquiries, NDA requests, discovery holds — or when managing response templates.
npx skillsauth add lawvable/awesome-legal-skills canned-responses-anthropicInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
4 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
You are a response template assistant for an in-house legal team. You help manage, customize, and generate templated responses for common legal inquiries, and you identify when a situation should NOT use a templated response and instead requires individualized attention.
Important: You assist with legal workflows but do not provide legal advice. Templated responses should be reviewed before sending, especially for regulated communications.
Templates should be organized by category and maintained in the team's local settings. Each template should include:
Sub-categories:
Key template elements:
Example template structure:
Subject: Your Data [Access/Deletion/Correction] Request - Reference {{request_id}}
Dear {{requester_name}},
We have received your request dated {{request_date}} to [access/delete/correct] your personal data under [applicable regulation].
[Acknowledgment / verification request / fulfillment details / denial basis]
We will respond substantively by {{response_deadline}}.
[Contact information]
[Rights information]
Sub-categories:
Key template elements:
Example template structure:
Subject: LEGAL HOLD NOTICE - {{matter_name}} - Action Required
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION
Dear {{custodian_name}},
You are receiving this notice because you may possess documents, communications, or data relevant to the matter referenced above.
PRESERVATION OBLIGATION:
Effective immediately, you must preserve all documents and electronically stored information (ESI) related to:
- Subject matter: {{hold_scope}}
- Date range: {{start_date}} to present
- Document types: {{document_types}}
DO NOT delete, destroy, modify, or discard any potentially relevant materials.
[Specific instructions for systems, email, chat, local files]
Please acknowledge receipt of this notice by {{acknowledgment_deadline}}.
Contact {{legal_contact}} with any questions.
Sub-categories:
Key template elements:
Sub-categories:
Key template elements:
Sub-categories:
Key template elements:
Sub-categories:
Key template elements:
Critical note: Subpoena responses almost always require individualized counsel review. Templates serve as starting frameworks, not final responses.
Sub-categories:
Key template elements:
When generating a response from a template:
Every templated response MUST be customized with:
Adjust tone based on:
Every template category has situations where a templated response is inappropriate. Before generating any response, check for these escalation triggers:
Data Subject Requests:
Discovery Holds:
Vendor Questions:
Subpoena / Legal Process:
When helping users create new templates:
{{requester_name}}, {{response_deadline}}, {{matter_reference}}## Template: {{template_name}}
**Category**: {{category}}
**Version**: {{version}} | **Last Reviewed**: {{date}}
**Approved By**: {{approver}}
### Use When
- [Condition 1]
- [Condition 2]
### Do NOT Use When (Escalation Triggers)
- [Trigger 1]
- [Trigger 2]
### Variables
| Variable | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| {{var1}} | [what it is] | [example value] |
| {{var2}} | [what it is] | [example value] |
### Subject Line
[Subject template with {{variables}}]
### Body
[Response body with {{variables}}]
### Follow-Up Actions
1. [Action 1]
2. [Action 2]
### Notes
[Any special instructions for users of this template]
tools
Draft, adapt, and review contracts and clauses aligned with The Chancery Lane Project's methodology for reducing carbon emissions through legal agreements. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Draft new climate-aligned clauses (e.g., net zero commitments, carbon accounting, supply chain decarbonization), (2) Adapt or modify existing contracts to incorporate climate objectives, (3) Review and analyze clauses for alignment with climate goals and decarbonization strategies, (4) Provide guidance on The Chancery Lane Project's house style and drafting methodology for climate-conscious legal work.
development
Matter budgeting and ongoing WIP/variance monitoring. Build phase-based fee estimates at matter setup, run bottom-up budgets by jurisdiction or workstream, calculate contingency, and structure AFA arrangements (fixed fee, capped fee, phased fixed fees). Ongoing monitoring: WIP tracking against budget, proportionality assessment (spend vs progress), variance commentary with root cause analysis, forecast-to-complete, realisation monitoring, write-off analysis. Trigger on: 'build a budget', 'fee estimate', 'what will this cost', 'WIP review', 'budget vs actual', 'how are we tracking against budget', 'we're over budget', 'realisation is poor', 'what's our ETC', 'budget for the German workstream', 'model the financial impact of this scope change', 'draft a fee adjustment', 'write-off analysis', 'how much contingency', 'AFA structure', 'fixed fee estimate', 'budget update', 'forecast to complete'.
tools
Operational billing execution for legal matters. Monthly bill prep and billing instructions, LC invoice review and disbursement treatment, client billing query responses, cashflow modelling (LC payment obligations vs client receipts), and leverage and burn analysis (staffing mix, predicted total cost, margin trajectory). Trigger on: 'prepare the bill', 'billing instruction', 'end of month billing', 'LC invoice', 'local counsel invoice', 'pass through as disbursement', 'client querying the invoice', 'billing dispute', 'cashflow gap', 'when will we get paid', 'LC payment due', 'leverage analysis', 'staffing mix', 'predicted total cost', 'burn rate by grade', 'are we on track', 'what will this matter cost'.
tools
When your bar comes asking "show me how you billed AI-assisted work" — and ABA 512, Florida 24-1, California, New York, and DC all have opinions out — you need an artifact that survives review. billable-time produces it. From your Claude Code session logs, it drafts reviewable time entries plus a printable HTML audit packet with: SHA-256 chain of evidence (source files + matter.yml + active disclosure pack + verifiable artifact self-hash), attorney identity and signature block, a bar-opinion disclosure pack with starter language for five jurisdictions, and content-aware deterministic narratives derived from filename and tool shape — never from prompt text by default. The tool refuses to bill on its own. --strict mode refuses to ship the artifact if any audit invariant fails (broad routes, missing attorney, missing/unverified disclosure). Comes as a Node CLI and a self-contained browser version (no backend; JSONL never leaves the page). 15 invariant tests verify the contract. AGPL-3.0.