skills/assignation-refere-communication-associe-selim-brihi/SKILL.md
Rédaction d'assignations en référé devant le tribunal de commerce ou des activités économiques pour le droit de communication d'un associé. Utiliser ce skill quand l'utilisateur demande de rédiger, préparer ou créer une assignation en référé fondée sur l'article L. 238-1 du code de commerce pour obtenir la communication forcée de documents sociaux (comptes annuels, rapports de gestion, PV d'assemblées, etc.) lorsqu'un dirigeant refuse ou fait obstruction à la communication de ces documents à un associé.
npx skillsauth add lawvable/awesome-legal-skills assignation-refere-communication-associe-selim-brihiInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
4 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Ce skill guide la rédaction d'assignations en référé devant le président du tribunal de commerce ou des activités économiques lorsqu'un associé demande l'injonction de communication de documents sociaux sur le fondement de l'article L. 238-1 du code de commerce.
Fondement unique : Article L. 238-1 du code de commerce (ne pas utiliser l'article 145 du CPC).
Pour que l'action soit recevable, 4 conditions doivent être réunies :
Collecter toutes les informations nécessaires auprès de l'utilisateur. Consulter workflow-informations.md pour :
Rédiger l'assignation en suivant la structure en 5 parties. Consulter structure-assignation.md pour le template complet :
Consulter workflow-informations.md pour :
Créer le document final en format .docx et le présenter à l'utilisateur.
| Forme | Article applicable | |-------|-------------------| | SARL | L. 223-26 | | SA | L. 225-115 et suivants | | SAS | L. 227-9 et L. 228-69 | | SNC | L. 221-7 |
Structure de l'assignation : Voir structure-assignation.md pour le template complet des 5 parties (en-tête, avertissements, corps avec faits et discussion juridique, dispositif avec astreinte, bordereau de pièces)
Workflow et informations : Voir workflow-informations.md pour le workflow de rédaction en 9 étapes, les informations à collecter, les 12 questions types à poser, les points clés de rédaction, l'adaptation selon la forme sociale, les éléments contextuels renforceurs, et les erreurs à éviter
tools
Draft, adapt, and review contracts and clauses aligned with The Chancery Lane Project's methodology for reducing carbon emissions through legal agreements. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Draft new climate-aligned clauses (e.g., net zero commitments, carbon accounting, supply chain decarbonization), (2) Adapt or modify existing contracts to incorporate climate objectives, (3) Review and analyze clauses for alignment with climate goals and decarbonization strategies, (4) Provide guidance on The Chancery Lane Project's house style and drafting methodology for climate-conscious legal work.
development
Matter budgeting and ongoing WIP/variance monitoring. Build phase-based fee estimates at matter setup, run bottom-up budgets by jurisdiction or workstream, calculate contingency, and structure AFA arrangements (fixed fee, capped fee, phased fixed fees). Ongoing monitoring: WIP tracking against budget, proportionality assessment (spend vs progress), variance commentary with root cause analysis, forecast-to-complete, realisation monitoring, write-off analysis. Trigger on: 'build a budget', 'fee estimate', 'what will this cost', 'WIP review', 'budget vs actual', 'how are we tracking against budget', 'we're over budget', 'realisation is poor', 'what's our ETC', 'budget for the German workstream', 'model the financial impact of this scope change', 'draft a fee adjustment', 'write-off analysis', 'how much contingency', 'AFA structure', 'fixed fee estimate', 'budget update', 'forecast to complete'.
tools
Operational billing execution for legal matters. Monthly bill prep and billing instructions, LC invoice review and disbursement treatment, client billing query responses, cashflow modelling (LC payment obligations vs client receipts), and leverage and burn analysis (staffing mix, predicted total cost, margin trajectory). Trigger on: 'prepare the bill', 'billing instruction', 'end of month billing', 'LC invoice', 'local counsel invoice', 'pass through as disbursement', 'client querying the invoice', 'billing dispute', 'cashflow gap', 'when will we get paid', 'LC payment due', 'leverage analysis', 'staffing mix', 'predicted total cost', 'burn rate by grade', 'are we on track', 'what will this matter cost'.
tools
When your bar comes asking "show me how you billed AI-assisted work" — and ABA 512, Florida 24-1, California, New York, and DC all have opinions out — you need an artifact that survives review. billable-time produces it. From your Claude Code session logs, it drafts reviewable time entries plus a printable HTML audit packet with: SHA-256 chain of evidence (source files + matter.yml + active disclosure pack + verifiable artifact self-hash), attorney identity and signature block, a bar-opinion disclosure pack with starter language for five jurisdictions, and content-aware deterministic narratives derived from filename and tool shape — never from prompt text by default. The tool refuses to bill on its own. --strict mode refuses to ship the artifact if any audit invariant fails (broad routes, missing attorney, missing/unverified disclosure). Comes as a Node CLI and a self-contained browser version (no backend; JSONL never leaves the page). 15 invariant tests verify the contract. AGPL-3.0.