lawvable/jurisrank
skills/argentine-supreme-court-analysis-adrian-lerer/SKILL.md
Argentine Supreme Court citation network analysis using JurisRank — a peer-reviewed PageRank algorithm with temporal decay for measuring jurisprudential authority. Ranks precedents by citation influence, traces doctrinal evolution, and detects constitutional drift. Published methodology: JCLLT (DOI: 10.47852/bonviewJCLLT62027951). Activate with: which cases to cite, rank precedents, case authority, doctrinal evolution, Argentine Supreme Court, CSJN jurisprudence, citation network, leading case, legal research Argentina.
$ install --global
skillsauthnpx skillsauth add lawvable/awesome-legal-skills jurisrankInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
Security Scan Results
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
3
Scanners Passed
9
Scanners in report
Clean
TrivyContainer and dependency vulnerability scanner
95%
Clean
SemgrepStatic code analysis for vulnerabilities
95%
Clean
mcp-scan (Snyk)Model Context Protocol security validation
95%
Skipped
Snyk (dep)Open source security scanning
50%
Skipped
Socket.devSupply chain security analysis
50%
Skipped
VirusTotalMulti-engine malware detection
50%
Skipped
CrowdStrikeAdvanced threat intelligence
50%
Skipped
OSV-ScannerOpen Source Vulnerability database check
50%
Skipped
OWASP Dep-Check
50%
Last scanned: Aug 1, 2026, 3:52 AM312.7s2 files scanned
SKILL.md
- name:
- jurisrank
- description:
- >
- Published methodology:
- JCLLT (DOI: 10.47852/bonviewJCLLT62027951).
- Activate with:
- which cases to cite, rank precedents, case authority,
- command:
- /jurisrank <topic-or-case>
- allowed-tools:
- Read, Write, WebFetch, Bash
- when_to_use:
- >
- effort:
- medium
- context:
- inline
- author:
- Adrián Lerer
- license:
- cc-by-4.0
- version:
- 2026-05-13
JurisRank — Argentine Jurisprudential Authority Analysis
What JurisRank Is
JurisRank is a computational tool for measuring the authority of Argentine court decisions through citation network analysis. Its methodology is peer-reviewed and published in the Journal of Computational Law and Legal Technology:
Lerer, I.A. (2026). "Computational Detection of Constitutional Drift: Network Analysis and Semantic Measurement of Argentine Supreme Court Jurisprudence (1922–2025)." Journal of Computational Law and Legal Technology. DOI: 10.47852/bonviewJCLLT62027951
Academic validation: κ = 0.83 inter-coder reliability · k-fold cross- validation (k=5) · 73.2% mean accuracy · Monte Carlo simulations (n=1,000).
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Three Algorithms
| Algorithm | Purpose | |-----------|---------| | JurisRank | PageRank + temporal decay — recent citations weighted higher | | RootFinder | Ancestral Borrowing Analysis Network — traces doctrinal genealogy | | Legal-Memespace | Principal Component Analysis — maps multidimensional doctrine |
Coverage
- Argentine Supreme Court (CSJN) — 1922 to present
- National and federal courts of appeals (Cámaras nacionales y federales)
- Selected provincial supreme courts
- Relevant international precedents cited by Argentine courts
Authority Score Interpretation
| Score | Meaning | Recommendation | |-------|---------|---------------| | > 0.8 | Leading case — highest citation authority | Cite first, with score | | 0.6–0.8 | Widely cited — strong precedential weight | Cite with score | | 0.4–0.6 | Relevant — moderate authority | Cite with note | | < 0.4 | Limited authority — outlier or isolated | Orientation only | | Not found | No network presence detected | Declare absence of precedent |
Use Cases
1. Selecting case law for briefs and memos
When multiple cases address the same issue, JurisRank identifies which carry the most authority in the citation network → cite the most influential first, in ranked order.
2. Doctrinal evolution analysis
Trace how CSJN or appellate court doctrine evolved on a specific topic. Identify whether the most recent decision continues or breaks from prior doctrine.
3. Adversarial jurisprudential due diligence
Verify whether precedents cited by opposing counsel are genuinely authoritative or low-influence outliers.
4. Constitutional drift detection
Detect shifts in citation patterns that signal doctrinal erosion or realignment — original application from the JCLLT paper.
Workflow
1. Identify topic or specific cases to analyze
2. Query JurisRank API:
GET https://api.jurisrank.com/v1/cases?query=<topic>
POST https://api.jurisrank.com/v1/analyze-authority {"case_id": "..."}
3. Interpret Authority Score and citation network position
4. Apply RootFinder for genealogy if doctrinal evolution is needed
5. Produce ranked analysis with citation recommendations
Anti-Hallucination Rules
JurisRank implements groundedness verification per the Stanford Legal AI Benchmark (Magesh et al., 2024):
Before including any case in the analysis:
- Confirm Authority Score > 0.0 (case exists in the network)
- Verify jurisdiction matches the forum of the matter
- Check temporal decay: has a more-cited posterior decision superseded it?
- Verify the case actually supports the proposition — not just addresses the topic
Never cite a case not found in the JurisRank network without explicitly declaring it as unverified.
Output Format
JURISRANK ANALYSIS — [Topic]
Date: [date] | Tool: JurisRank (Lerer, 2026, JCLLT)
## RANKED PRECEDENTS BY AUTHORITY
| Case | Court | Year | Authority Score | Network Position |
|------|-------|------|----------------|-----------------|
| ... | CSJN | ... | 0.92 | Leading case |
## DOCTRINAL EVOLUTION
[Timeline: how doctrine developed]
## CITATION NETWORK
[Which cases cite each other; doctrinal clusters]
## RECOMMENDATION
[Which cases to cite · in what order · why]
About the Author
Ignacio Adrián Lerer is an Argentine attorney and independent researcher. JurisRank was developed as part of research on computational legal analysis published in peer-reviewed journals. The tool is registered with Argentina's DNDA (copyright registry) and has a patent application pending at INPI Argentina.
Contact: justitia.com.ar
Related Skills
lawvable/security-review-openai
development
VerifiedTrustedOfficial
Perform language and framework specific security best-practice reviews and suggest improvements. Trigger only when the user explicitly requests security best practices guidance, a security review/report, or secure-by-default coding help. Trigger only for supported languages (python, javascript/typescript, go). Do not trigger for general code review, debugging, or non-security tasks.
606SKILL.mdUpdated Aug 1, 2026
lawvable/cmmc
development
VerifiedTrustedOfficial
Expert CMMC 2.0 (Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification) advisor for US defense contractors and subcontractors in the Defense Industrial Base (DIB). Use this skill whenever a user asks about CMMC 2.0, CMMC Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3, DoD cybersecurity compliance, NIST SP 800-171, CUI (Controlled Unclassified Information) protection, System Security Plan (SSP), Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M), C3PAO assessments, DIBCAC audits, self-assessment, SPRS score, or any requirement under DFARS 252.204-7012 or 7021. Also trigger for: "CMMC gap analysis", "CMMC readiness", "FCI protection", "CUI scoping", "CMMC practices", "DoD contract cybersecurity", "defense supply chain security", or "prime contractor flow-down requirements".
606SKILL.mdUpdated Aug 1, 2026
lawvable/client-instruction-schedule
tools
VerifiedTrustedOfficial
Build a client instruction schedule — a plain-English, Scott Schedule-style Word table that gathers a struggling client's evidence and instructions issue by issue, with a one-page covering note. Use whenever the user asks for a "client instruction schedule", "instruction schedule", "client questionnaire", "schedule of questions for the client", "get instructions from the client on the papers", or says the client is overwhelmed and needs the case broken into manageable questions. Also trigger when asked to turn case papers into a structured request for client input. Do NOT use for court-facing Scott Schedules, pleadings, witness statements, or advice letters — this skill produces a client-facing working document only. Output is always a .docx draft for solicitor review, never a final document.
606SKILL.mdUpdated Aug 1, 2026
lawvable/client-explanation-translator-larissa-meredith-flister
tools
VerifiedTrustedOfficial
Turn complex legal analysis into clear, commercially useful client-facing advice. Use this whenever the user has dense legal material — drafting, internal analysis, counsel notes, research memos, pleadings, a case update, or correspondence — and wants it converted into something a client can actually understand and act on. Trigger on phrases like 'explain this to the client', 'put this in plain English', 'translate this for a non-lawyer', 'turn this into client-facing advice', 'make this client-ready', 'draft a client update', or when the user shares legal analysis and asks 'what does this mean for them'. Also trigger when the user wants a board summary, litigation risk update, or call script derived from legal material. The skill preserves legal nuance, uncertainty, and risk rather than oversimplifying — it makes advice usable, not just simpler.
606SKILL.mdUpdated Aug 1, 2026