latestaiagents/memory-tool

Memory Tool

The Memory tool lets Claude read and write files in a client-managed directory, giving agents persistent state across sessions without RAG infrastructure.

When to Use

• Agents that need to remember user preferences, project context, or past decisions
• Coding agents that accumulate knowledge about a codebase over sessions
• Support/assistant agents that build up a history per user
• Replacing "dump everything into system prompt" with structured persistent state

Core Concept

The Memory tool is a server-side tool (provided by Anthropic) that Claude can call to read, write, and list files in a directory you manage. The API gives the tool calls; your app executes them against real storage (local fs, S3, DB-backed fs).

const response = await client.beta.messages.create({
  model: "claude-sonnet-4-6",
  max_tokens: 4096,
  tools: [{ type: "memory_20250818", name: "memory" }],
  messages: [...],
});

Implementing the Memory Backend

When Claude calls the memory tool, your app handles the file operations. Minimal implementation:

import fs from "fs/promises";
import path from "path";

const MEMORY_ROOT = "/var/app/memory";

async function handleMemoryCall(input: any, userId: string) {
  const userRoot = path.join(MEMORY_ROOT, userId);
  const safe = (p: string) => {
    const resolved = path.resolve(userRoot, p.replace(/^\//, ""));
    if (!resolved.startsWith(userRoot + path.sep)) throw new Error("Path escapes root");
    return resolved;
  };

  switch (input.command) {
    case "view": {
      const target = safe(input.path);
      const stat = await fs.stat(target).catch(() => null);
      if (!stat) return { error: "not found" };
      if (stat.isDirectory()) {
        const entries = await fs.readdir(target);
        return { content: entries.join("\n") };
      }
      return { content: await fs.readFile(target, "utf-8") };
    }
    case "create": {
      await fs.mkdir(path.dirname(safe(input.path)), { recursive: true });
      await fs.writeFile(safe(input.path), input.file_text);
      return { content: "created" };
    }
    case "str_replace": {
      const f = safe(input.path);
      const text = await fs.readFile(f, "utf-8");
      if (!text.includes(input.old_str)) return { error: "old_str not found" };
      await fs.writeFile(f, text.replace(input.old_str, input.new_str));
      return { content: "replaced" };
    }
    case "insert": {
      const f = safe(input.path);
      const lines = (await fs.readFile(f, "utf-8")).split("\n");
      lines.splice(input.insert_line, 0, input.insert_text);
      await fs.writeFile(f, lines.join("\n"));
      return { content: "inserted" };
    }
    case "delete": {
      await fs.rm(safe(input.path), { recursive: true, force: true });
      return { content: "deleted" };
    }
    case "rename": {
      await fs.rename(safe(input.old_path), safe(input.new_path));
      return { content: "renamed" };
    }
  }
}

Per-user roots are critical — never share memory across users.

Tool-Use Loop

async function runWithMemory(userId: string, userMessage: string) {
  const messages = [{ role: "user", content: userMessage }];

  while (true) {
    const response = await client.beta.messages.create({
      model: "claude-sonnet-4-6",
      max_tokens: 4096,
      tools: [{ type: "memory_20250818", name: "memory" }],
      messages,
    });

    messages.push({ role: "assistant", content: response.content });
    if (response.stop_reason !== "tool_use") return response;

    const toolResults = [];
    for (const block of response.content) {
      if (block.type === "tool_use" && block.name === "memory") {
        const result = await handleMemoryCall(block.input, userId);
        toolResults.push({
          type: "tool_result",
          tool_use_id: block.id,
          content: result.content ?? result.error,
          is_error: !!result.error,
        });
      }
    }
    messages.push({ role: "user", content: toolResults });
  }
}

Suggested Directory Layout

Claude will structure the memory itself, but seeding a clean layout helps. Example for a coding agent:

/memory/
  user_profile.md          # who the user is, preferences
  current_project.md       # what we're working on
  decisions/
    2026-04-15-auth.md     # architectural decisions
  conventions.md           # code style rules learned
  blockers.md              # open issues

Prompt the agent with this layout in the system prompt so it uses consistent paths.

System Prompt Pattern

You have persistent memory at /memory. Before answering, consult:
- /memory/user_profile.md
- /memory/current_project.md

After significant work, update memory:
- Save user preferences to /memory/user_profile.md
- Save decisions to /memory/decisions/YYYY-MM-DD-topic.md
- Keep /memory/current_project.md up to date with what we're doing

Use `view` to read, `create`/`str_replace` to write. Keep memory concise.

Memory vs Context vs RAG

| Approach | Best for | Downside | |---|---|---| | Memory tool | Structured state the agent curates itself | Agent has to remember to read/write | | Large context | One-shot reasoning on full corpus | Expensive per call | | RAG | Huge static corpus | Brittle retrieval; no synthesis across docs |

Memory shines when the agent decides what's worth remembering, not a retrieval system.

Versioning & Safety

• Store memory in a durable, versioned backend (git-backed fs works well)
• Snapshot before destructive operations (delete, rename)
• Audit-log every write
• Enforce size limits — agents can fill memory; cap per-user MBs
• Never execute anything from memory files (they can be indirectly user-controlled)

Anti-Patterns

1. Global memory across users — huge privacy leak
2. No size limit — agent writes 10GB over time
3. No path validation — agent uses ../ or absolute paths
4. Dumping conversation logs into memory verbatim — grows unbounded
5. Forgetting to prompt the agent to consult memory — it won't know to look

Best Practices

1. Per-user memory root, enforced with path sandboxing
2. Seed a clean directory layout in the system prompt
3. Cap memory size per user (e.g., 10 MB)
4. Snapshot/backup before destructive ops
5. Audit every operation
6. Periodically prompt the agent to compress/clean its own memory