lambdalisue/pr-review

Context

!git branch --show-current !gh repo view --json nameWithOwner --jq '.nameWithOwner' !gh pr view --json number --jq '.number' 2>/dev/null || echo 'NO_PR'

Principles

• If PR number is provided as argument, use that number
• If no argument, use the PR number from Context above
• Only show unresolved review comments (threads not marked as resolved)
• This command is display-only. Do NOT modify files, reply to threads, resolve threads, or ask the user for actions
• Summarize and analyze comments in Japanese for the user
• Show planned reply content in the REVIEWER's language (detect from original comment)

Workflow

Step 1: Determine PR number and repo

Use the values already resolved in Context section above. Split nameWithOwner by "/" to get OWNER and REPO. If argument was provided, use that as PR_NUMBER instead.

Step 2: Fetch review threads

Build the query by replacing OWNER, REPO, PR_NUMBER with actual values. Embed values directly in the query. Do NOT use GraphQL variables.

gh api graphql -f query='{ repository(owner: "OWNER", name: "REPO") { pullRequest(number: PR_NUMBER) { reviewThreads(first: 100) { nodes { id isResolved comments(first: 10) { nodes { id body author { login } path line startLine diffHunk } } } } } } }'

Pipe the result to filter unresolved threads:

| jq '[.data.repository.pullRequest.reviewThreads.nodes[] | select(.isResolved == false)]'

Step 3: Analyze and display in Japanese

Read the relevant source files for each comment to understand the full context before analyzing.

Display unresolved comments as a numbered list. Each finding uses the following structure:

Severity levels (exactly 3 characters using filled and empty stars):

• Must address: (★★★)
• Should address: (★★☆)
• Optional: (★☆☆)
• Disagree: (☆☆☆)

Format (follow exactly):

## 未解決のレビューコメント (N件)

---

### 1. 指摘のタイトル (`path/to/file:line`) (★★☆)

> 指摘事項の要約をここに記述する。何が指摘されているのかを簡潔にまとめる。

指摘に対してどう考えるか。対応するべきか、対応不要か、その理由を述べる。

対応する場合は対応方法の概要を簡潔に記述する。

**返信内容** (@reviewer_name へ、レビュワーの言語で):

> Reply content in the reviewer's language here.
> This should be the actual message you would post as a thread reply.

---

### 2. ...

Notes:

• Sort by severity (★★★ > ★★☆ > ★☆☆ > ☆☆☆)
• The opinion section should include your own judgment: agree/disagree with the reviewer, whether it's worth fixing, and why
• The 返信内容 section MUST be in the reviewer's language (detected from the original comment), NOT Japanese
• Do NOT offer to take any actions after displaying the report

Begin

Execute the workflow above. Start from Step 1.