skills/Git Commit Helper/SKILL.md
Generate descriptive commit messages by analyzing git diffs. Use when the user asks for help writing commit messages or reviewing staged changes.
npx skillsauth add kitfunso/omniskill Git Commit HelperInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Analyze staged changes and generate commit message:
# View staged changes
git diff --staged
# Generate commit message based on changes
# (Claude will analyze the diff and suggest a message)
Follow conventional commits format:
<type>(<scope>): <description>
[optional body]
[optional footer]
Feature commit:
feat(auth): add JWT authentication
Implement JWT-based authentication system with:
- Login endpoint with token generation
- Token validation middleware
- Refresh token support
Bug fix:
fix(api): handle null values in user profile
Prevent crashes when user profile fields are null.
Add null checks before accessing nested properties.
Refactor:
refactor(database): simplify query builder
Extract common query patterns into reusable functions.
Reduce code duplication in database layer.
Review what's being committed:
# Show files changed
git status
# Show detailed changes
git diff --staged
# Show statistics
git diff --staged --stat
# Show changes for specific file
git diff --staged path/to/file
DO:
DON'T:
When committing multiple related changes:
refactor(core): restructure authentication module
- Move auth logic from controllers to service layer
- Extract validation into separate validators
- Update tests to use new structure
- Add integration tests for auth flow
Breaking change: Auth service now requires config object
Frontend:
feat(ui): add loading spinner to dashboardfix(form): validate email formatBackend:
feat(api): add user profile endpointfix(db): resolve connection pool leakInfrastructure:
chore(ci): update Node version to 20feat(docker): add multi-stage buildIndicate breaking changes clearly:
feat(api)!: restructure API response format
BREAKING CHANGE: All API responses now follow JSON:API spec
Previous format:
{ "data": {...}, "status": "ok" }
New format:
{ "data": {...}, "meta": {...} }
Migration guide: Update client code to handle new response structure
git diff --stagedUse git add -p for selective staging:
# Stage changes interactively
git add -p
# Review what's staged
git diff --staged
# Commit with message
git commit -m "type(scope): description"
Fix the last commit message:
# Amend commit message only
git commit --amend
# Amend and add more changes
git add forgotten-file.js
git commit --amend --no-edit
development
Weekly engineering retrospective. Analyzes commit history, work patterns, and code quality metrics with persistent history and trend tracking. Team-aware: breaks down per-person contributions with praise and growth areas. Use when asked to "weekly retro", "what did we ship", or "engineering retrospective". Proactively suggest at the end of a work week or sprint.
development
Systematically QA test a web application and fix bugs found. Runs QA testing, then iteratively fixes bugs in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying. Use when asked to "qa", "QA", "test this site", "find bugs", "test and fix", or "fix what's broken". Proactively suggest when the user says a feature is ready for testing or asks "does this work?". Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only), Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores, fix evidence, and a ship-readiness summary. For report-only mode, use /qa-only.
development
Report-only QA testing. Systematically tests a web application and produces a structured report with health score, screenshots, and repro steps — but never fixes anything. Use when asked to "just report bugs", "qa report only", or "test but don't fix". For the full test-fix-verify loop, use /qa instead. Proactively suggest when the user wants a bug report without any code changes.
testing
Eng manager-mode plan review. Lock in the execution plan — architecture, data flow, diagrams, edge cases, test coverage, performance. Walks through issues interactively with opinionated recommendations. Use when asked to "review the architecture", "engineering review", or "lock in the plan". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan or design doc and is about to start coding — to catch architecture issues before implementation.