skills/azure-resource-health-diagnose/SKILL.md
Analyze Azure resource health, diagnose issues from logs and telemetry, and create a remediation plan for identified problems.
npx skillsauth add jyjeanne/ai-setup-forge azure-resource-health-diagnoseInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
This workflow analyzes a specific Azure resource to assess its health status, diagnose potential issues using logs and telemetry data, and develop a comprehensive remediation plan for any problems discovered.
azmcp-*) over direct Azure CLI when availableAction: Retrieve diagnostic and troubleshooting best practices Tools: Azure MCP best practices tool Process:
Action: Locate and identify the target Azure resource Tools: Azure MCP tools + Azure CLI fallback Process:
Resource Lookup:
azmcp-subscription-listaz resource list --name <resource-name> to find matching resourcesResource Type Detection:
Action: Evaluate current resource health and availability Tools: Azure MCP monitoring tools + Azure CLI Process:
Basic Health Check:
Service-Specific Health Indicators:
Action: Analyze logs and telemetry to identify issues and patterns Tools: Azure MCP monitoring tools for Log Analytics queries Process:
Find Monitoring Sources:
azmcp-monitor-workspace-list to identify Log Analytics workspacesazmcp-monitor-table-listExecute Diagnostic Queries:
Use azmcp-monitor-log-query with targeted KQL queries based on resource type:
General Error Analysis:
// Recent errors and exceptions
union isfuzzy=true
AzureDiagnostics,
AppServiceHTTPLogs,
AppServiceAppLogs,
AzureActivity
| where TimeGenerated > ago(24h)
| where Level == "Error" or ResultType != "Success"
| summarize ErrorCount=count() by Resource, ResultType, bin(TimeGenerated, 1h)
| order by TimeGenerated desc
Performance Analysis:
// Performance degradation patterns
Perf
| where TimeGenerated > ago(7d)
| where ObjectName == "Processor" and CounterName == "% Processor Time"
| summarize avg(CounterValue) by Computer, bin(TimeGenerated, 1h)
| where avg_CounterValue > 80
Application-Specific Queries:
// Application Insights - Failed requests
requests
| where timestamp > ago(24h)
| where success == false
| summarize FailureCount=count() by resultCode, bin(timestamp, 1h)
| order by timestamp desc
// Database - Connection failures
AzureDiagnostics
| where ResourceProvider == "MICROSOFT.SQL"
| where Category == "SQLSecurityAuditEvents"
| where action_name_s == "CONNECTION_FAILED"
| summarize ConnectionFailures=count() by bin(TimeGenerated, 1h)
Pattern Recognition:
Action: Categorize identified issues and determine root causes Process:
Issue Classification:
Root Cause Analysis:
Impact Assessment:
Action: Create a comprehensive plan to address identified issues Process:
Immediate Actions (Critical issues):
Short-term Fixes (High/Medium issues):
Long-term Improvements (All issues):
Implementation Steps:
Action: Present findings and get approval for remediation actions Process:
Display Health Assessment Summary:
🏥 Azure Resource Health Assessment
📊 Resource Overview:
• Resource: [Name] ([Type])
• Status: [Healthy/Warning/Critical]
• Location: [Region]
• Last Analyzed: [Timestamp]
🚨 Issues Identified:
• Critical: X issues requiring immediate attention
• High: Y issues affecting performance/reliability
• Medium: Z issues for optimization
• Low: N informational items
🔍 Top Issues:
1. [Issue Type]: [Description] - Impact: [High/Medium/Low]
2. [Issue Type]: [Description] - Impact: [High/Medium/Low]
3. [Issue Type]: [Description] - Impact: [High/Medium/Low]
🛠️ Remediation Plan:
• Immediate Actions: X items
• Short-term Fixes: Y items
• Long-term Improvements: Z items
• Estimated Resolution Time: [Timeline]
❓ Proceed with detailed remediation plan? (y/n)
Generate Detailed Report:
# Azure Resource Health Report: [Resource Name]
**Generated**: [Timestamp]
**Resource**: [Full Resource ID]
**Overall Health**: [Status with color indicator]
## 🔍 Executive Summary
[Brief overview of health status and key findings]
## 📊 Health Metrics
- **Availability**: X% over last 24h
- **Performance**: [Average response time/throughput]
- **Error Rate**: X% over last 24h
- **Resource Utilization**: [CPU/Memory/Storage percentages]
## 🚨 Issues Identified
### Critical Issues
- **[Issue 1]**: [Description]
- **Root Cause**: [Analysis]
- **Impact**: [Business impact]
- **Immediate Action**: [Required steps]
### High Priority Issues
- **[Issue 2]**: [Description]
- **Root Cause**: [Analysis]
- **Impact**: [Performance/reliability impact]
- **Recommended Fix**: [Solution steps]
## 🛠️ Remediation Plan
### Phase 1: Immediate Actions (0-2 hours)
```bash
# Critical fixes to restore service
[Azure CLI commands with explanations]
# Performance and reliability improvements
[Azure CLI commands with explanations]
# Architectural and preventive measures
[Azure CLI commands and configuration changes]
development
Generate breadboard circuit mockups and visual diagrams using HTML5 Canvas drawing techniques. Use when asked to create circuit layouts, visualize electronic component placements, draw breadboard diagrams, mockup 6502 builds, generate retro computer schematics, or design vintage electronics projects. Supports 555 timers, W65C02S microprocessors, 28C256 EEPROMs, W65C22 VIA chips, 7400-series logic gates, LEDs, resistors, capacitors, switches, buttons, crystals, and wires.
development
Apply lean thinking to UX: hypothesis-driven design, collaborative sketching, and rapid experiments instead of heavy deliverables. Use when the user mentions "Lean UX", "design hypothesis", "UX experiment", "collaborative design", or "outcome over output". Covers hypothesis statements, MVPs for UX, and cross-functional collaboration. For Build-Measure-Learn, see lean-startup. For usability audits, see ux-heuristics.
development
Design MVPs, validated learning experiments, and pivot-or-persevere decisions using Build-Measure-Learn. Use when the user mentions "MVP scope", "validated learning", "pivot or persevere", "vanity metrics", or "test assumptions". Covers innovation accounting and actionable metrics. For 5-day prototype testing, see design-sprint. For customer motivation analysis, see jobs-to-be-done.
tools
Instrument, trace, evaluate, and monitor LLM applications and AI agents with LangSmith. Use when setting up observability for LLM pipelines, running offline or online evaluations, managing prompts in the Prompt Hub, creating datasets for regression testing, or deploying agent servers. Triggers on: langsmith, langchain tracing, llm tracing, llm observability, llm evaluation, trace llm calls, @traceable, wrap_openai, langsmith evaluate, langsmith dataset, langsmith feedback, langsmith prompt hub, langsmith project, llm monitoring, llm debugging, llm quality, openevals, langsmith cli, langsmith experiment, annotate llm, llm judge.