plugins/wealth-management/skills/alternatives/SKILL.md
Analyze alternative investments including hedge funds, private equity, and venture capital. Use when the user asks about hedge fund strategies (long/short, macro, event-driven), PE or VC performance metrics (IRR, TVPI, DPI), fee structures ('2-and-20', carry, hurdle rates), the J-curve effect, illiquidity premiums, lock-up periods, or hedge fund replication. Also trigger when users mention 'managed futures', 'CTA', 'fund of funds', 'vintage year', 'capital calls', 'distributions', 'carried interest', or ask how to evaluate an alternative investment manager.
npx skillsauth add joellewis/finance_skills alternativesInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
The standard hedge fund fee is "2-and-20" — 2% annual management fee on AUM plus 20% performance fee on profits.
Private equity funds typically show negative returns in the early years because management fees are charged on committed capital, initial investments are carried at cost or slightly written down, and returns have not yet materialized. As portfolio companies mature and are exited, returns improve. The characteristic shape — initial losses followed by gains — resembles the letter J.
PE fund performance is significantly influenced by the economic environment at the time of investment. Spreading commitments across multiple vintage years reduces the risk of investing all capital at unfavorable valuations.
The expected excess return demanded for accepting illiquidity — the inability to sell quickly at fair value. Private equity, venture capital, and certain hedge funds impose lock-up periods (1-10+ years). The illiquidity premium is theoretically 150-400bp for PE and private credit, though estimates vary and are debated.
Many hedge fund returns can be replicated with systematic factor exposure (equity market, size, value, momentum, credit, volatility selling). Research shows that a significant portion of hedge fund "alpha" is actually alternative beta — compensation for well-known risk factors. True alpha (manager skill net of factor exposure) is scarce and diminishing.
Key areas: operational risk (back-office, custody, valuation practices), strategy capacity (can the strategy scale?), manager skill vs factor exposure, transparency and reporting, alignment of interests, and regulatory compliance.
| Formula | Expression | Use Case | |---------|-----------|----------| | Management Fee | AUM × Management Fee Rate | Annual fee on assets | | Performance Fee | max(0, Gains Above HWM) × Perf Fee Rate | Fee on profits | | Net Return (2-and-20) | Gross Return - 2% - 20% × max(0, Gross - Hurdle) | After-fee return | | TVPI | (Distributions + NAV) / Paid-In Capital | Total return multiple | | DPI | Distributions / Paid-In Capital | Realized return multiple | | RVPI | NAV / Paid-In Capital | Unrealized return multiple | | IRR | Rate r: sum CF_t/(1+r)^t = 0 | Money-weighted return |
Given: $10M invested, gross return = 8%, 2% management fee, 20% performance fee, no hurdle rate Calculate: Net return and fee drag Solution: Management fee = $10M × 2% = $200,000 Gross profit = $10M × 8% = $800,000 Performance fee = 20% × $800,000 = $160,000 (charged on gross profits; under this fee structure the management fee is calculated independently and is not deducted first — some funds instead charge the incentive fee net of the management fee, which would give 20% × $600,000 = $120,000; always check the fund documents) Total fees = $200,000 + $160,000 = $360,000 Net return = ($800,000 - $360,000) / $10,000,000 = 4.4% Fee drag = 8.0% - 4.4% = 3.6 percentage points
The investor keeps 4.4% of the 8.0% gross return. Fees consume 45% of gross returns in this example. At lower gross returns, the fee drag as a percentage becomes even more severe.
Given: A PE fund calls $2M/year for 5 years (total $10M). Distributions: Year 4 = $1M, Year 5 = $3M, Year 6 = $5M, Year 7 = $8M, Year 8 = $4M. No residual value after Year 8. Calculate: DPI, TVPI, and approximate IRR Solution: Total distributions = $1M + $3M + $5M + $8M + $4M = $21M Total paid-in = $2M × 5 = $10M DPI = $21M / $10M = 2.1x TVPI = (21M + 0) / $10M = 2.1x (no residual, so TVPI = DPI)
Cash flows for IRR: Year 1: -$2M, Year 2: -$2M, Year 3: -$2M, Year 4: -$2M + $1M = -$1M, Year 5: -$2M + $3M = +$1M, Year 6: +$5M, Year 7: +$8M, Year 8: +$4M Solving for IRR numerically yields approximately 23%.
The J-curve is visible: negative net cash flows in years 1-4, turning positive in year 5, with the bulk of value returned in years 6-7.
testing
Model, forecast, and interpret volatility using time-series models and options-implied measures. Use when the user asks about EWMA, GARCH models, implied volatility, volatility surfaces, volatility term structure, or the VIX. Also trigger when users mention 'volatility smile', 'volatility skew', 'realized vs implied vol', 'volatility risk premium', 'vol clustering', 'mean-reverting volatility', 'options pricing inputs', 'RiskMetrics', 'decay factor', or ask how to forecast future volatility for risk management.
testing
Execute a complete tax-loss harvesting workflow from candidate identification through post-harvest monitoring. Use when the user asks about finding TLH candidates, gain/loss budgeting, replacement security selection, wash-sale compliance, or harvest execution planning. Also trigger when users mention 'unrealized losses in my portfolio', 'swap ETFs for tax purposes', 'harvest losses before year-end', 'substantially identical security', 'wash-sale window', 'NIIT offset', 'loss carryforward', or ask how much tax they can save by harvesting.
testing
Maximizes after-tax returns through strategic asset location, gain/loss management, and withdrawal sequencing. Use when the user asks about asset location, Roth conversions, tax-efficient withdrawals, tax lot selection, or charitable giving with appreciated securities. Also trigger when users mention 'which account should I hold bonds in', 'tax drag', 'Roth vs Traditional', 'RMD planning', 'bracket stuffing', 'HIFO vs FIFO', or ask how to minimize taxes on investments. For tax-loss harvesting execution and wash-sale mechanics, see the tax-loss-harvesting skill.
development
Plan and track savings for specific financial goals including retirement, education, and home purchase. Use when the user asks about required savings rates, 529 plans, retirement accumulation targets, down payment planning, or goal prioritization. Also trigger when users mention 'how much do I need to save each month', 'am I on track for retirement', 'college savings', 'safe withdrawal rate', '4% rule', 'FIRE savings rate', 'catch-up contributions', 'employer match', or ask how to balance competing savings goals.