skills/id8labs/exit/SKILL.md
Exit engine for ID8Labs. Position for and execute successful exits through strategic preparation, valuation optimization, and deal execution.
npx skillsauth add jmsktm/claude-settings exitInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Position your product for a successful exit. Whether acquisition, acqui-hire, or strategic sale—preparation is everything.
Philosophy: Exits are not events, they're outcomes. Build acquirable from day one. The best exits happen when you're not desperate.
/exit <project-slug>Run full exit readiness assessment.
Process:
/exit assessEvaluate exit readiness and identify gaps.
/exit valueEstimate valuation range and comparable exits.
/exit dataroomCreate due diligence documentation checklist.
/exit memoDraft internal exit strategy memo.
| Exit Type | Realistic For | Typical Range | |-----------|---------------|---------------| | Acqui-hire | Any stage | $50K-500K | | Asset sale | With users/revenue | $50K-1M | | Strategic acquisition | PMF + growth | $500K-10M | | Financial acquisition | Scale | $5M+ |
Too early signals:
Right time signals:
Warning signs to exit:
Exit readiness scorecard:
| Factor | Score (1-5) | Notes | |--------|-------------|-------| | Product-Market Fit | | Evidence of PMF | | Revenue/Growth | | MRR, growth rate | | User Base | | Size, engagement | | Technology | | Clean, documented | | Team | | Dependencies | | Legal | | Clean cap table, IP | | Operations | | Systematized | | Market Position | | Competitive moat |
Scoring:
Positioning for acquirers:
| Acquirer Type | What They Want | How to Position | |---------------|----------------|-----------------| | Strategic (competitor) | Market share, customers | User base, retention | | Strategic (adjacent) | New capability | Technology, team | | Financial (PE/VC) | Returns | Growth, margins | | Individual buyer | Lifestyle business | Cash flow, low effort |
Positioning activities:
Valuation methods:
| Method | Formula | Best For | |--------|---------|----------| | Revenue multiple | ARR × Multiple | SaaS with growth | | Profit multiple | EBITDA × Multiple | Profitable businesses | | User-based | Users × Value/User | Pre-revenue, engaged users | | Asset value | Assets - Liabilities | Distressed/no growth | | Comparable | What similar sold for | Market validation |
SaaS multiples (solo builder scale):
| Growth Rate | Typical Multiple | |-------------|------------------| | <10% YoY | 2-3x ARR | | 10-30% YoY | 3-5x ARR | | 30-50% YoY | 5-8x ARR | | >50% YoY | 8-12x ARR |
Adjustments:
Data room essentials:
| Category | Documents | |----------|-----------| | Corporate | Formation docs, cap table, contracts | | Financial | P&L, balance sheet, projections | | Product | Tech docs, architecture, roadmap | | Customers | Metrics, top accounts, churn analysis | | Team | Org chart, key person dependencies | | Legal | IP assignments, material agreements |
Preparation timeline:
| Timeframe | Actions | |-----------|---------| | 12 months out | Clean up financials, document processes | | 6 months out | Build data room, fix legal issues | | 3 months out | Prepare materials, identify buyers | | 1 month out | Finalize data room, practice pitch |
Deal structure components:
| Component | Description | Typical Range | |-----------|-------------|---------------| | Cash at close | Immediate payment | 50-80% | | Earnout | Performance-based | 10-30% | | Equity | Stock in acquirer | 0-20% | | Escrow | Held for indemnity | 10-20% | | Employment | Retention package | Varies |
Negotiation priorities:
Closing process:
LOI SIGNED
↓
Due diligence (30-60 days)
↓
Definitive agreement negotiation
↓
Final document execution
↓
Closing conditions satisfied
↓
CLOSE
Post-close:
frameworks/exit-options.md - Types of exits and fit
frameworks/valuation.md - Methods and multiples
frameworks/due-diligence.md - What buyers want
frameworks/deal-structure.md - Terms and negotiation
frameworks/acquisition-prep.md - 12-month prep plan
templates/data-room-checklist.md - Due diligence documents
templates/exit-memo.md - Internal exit strategy
templates/term-sheet-review.md - Analyzing offers
Perplexity:
GitHub:
strategic-think-tank:
After completing exit preparation:
Save outputs:
docs/EXIT_MEMO.mddocs/data-room/Log to tracker:
/tracker log {project-slug} "EXIT: Preparation complete. Valuation range: ${X}-${Y}. Ready for market."
Update state:
/tracker update {project-slug} EXITING
On successful exit:
/tracker update {project-slug} EXITED
| Red Flag | Impact | Fix | |----------|--------|-----| | Messy cap table | Deal complexity | Clean up early | | No financial records | Trust issues | Start tracking now | | Single customer >50% | Risk | Diversify | | Key person dependency | Risk | Document, cross-train | | IP not assigned | Deal blocker | Fix immediately | | Material litigation | Deal killer | Resolve before |
| Anti-Pattern | Why Bad | Do Instead | |--------------|---------|------------| | Waiting until desperate | Weak negotiating position | Plan 12+ months ahead | | Hiding problems | Will surface in DD | Disclose upfront | | Only one buyer | No leverage | Create competition | | Focusing only on price | Miss bad terms | Evaluate full package | | No advisor | Make mistakes | Get help on first exit | | Neglecting business during sale | Value erodes | Keep running hard |
Before starting exit process:
data-ai
Optimize YouTube videos for SEO, thumbnails, descriptions, and audience retention
testing
Design and facilitate effective workshops with agendas, activities, and outcomes
data-ai
Design and optimize AI-powered workflows for complex tasks
data-ai
Design and implement automated workflows to eliminate repetitive tasks and streamline processes