skills/decision-helper/SKILL.md
Make better decisions using structured frameworks and mental models
npx skillsauth add jmsktm/claude-settings Decision HelperInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
The Decision Helper skill guides you through structured decision-making processes using proven frameworks, mental models, and de-biasing techniques. Rather than relying on gut feel alone or getting paralyzed by analysis, this skill helps you think clearly about choices that matter.
This skill applies decision science, behavioral economics, and strategic thinking frameworks to help you evaluate options systematically, identify hidden biases, consider long-term consequences, and make choices you'll be confident about. It recognizes different decision types—reversible vs. irreversible, urgent vs. important, personal vs. professional—and provides appropriate frameworks for each.
The tool doesn't make decisions for you—it clarifies your thinking, surfaces assumptions, and ensures you've considered what matters most before committing to a path.
Clarify what you're actually deciding:
Expand your choice set:
Identify what matters:
Assess options against criteria:
Pressure-test your choice:
For prioritization and urgency decisions:
| | Urgent | Not Urgent | |---|---|---| | Important | DO NOW | SCHEDULE | | Not Important | DELEGATE | ELIMINATE |
Widen your options
Reality-test your assumptions
Attain distance before deciding
Prepare to be wrong
Project yourself to age 80 and ask:
Best for: Life-changing decisions, risk-taking, career choices
| Option | Criterion 1 (weight: 5) | Criterion 2 (weight: 3) | Criterion 3 (weight: 2) | Total | |---|---|---|---|---| | Option A | 4 × 5 = 20 | 3 × 3 = 9 | 5 × 2 = 10 | 39 | | Option B | 5 × 5 = 25 | 2 × 3 = 6 | 3 × 2 = 6 | 37 |
Best for: Complex decisions with multiple factors
Two-Way Doors (Reversible)
One-Way Doors (Irreversible)
Don't just ask "What happens next?" Ask "And then what?"
Example:
Would you take this option if it required 10x the effort/cost?
If yes → genuine priorities If no → probably not that important
| Action | Command/Trigger | |--------|-----------------| | Start decision process | "help me decide" or "making a decision" | | Binary choice | "should I [option A] or [option B]" | | Generate options | "what are my options for [situation]" | | Evaluate trade-offs | "compare [option A] vs [option B]" | | Pressure test | "help me validate my decision" | | Remove bias | "am I thinking clearly about [decision]" | | Long-term view | "future implications of [decision]" | | Risk assessment | "what could go wrong with [decision]" |
Framework: Regret Minimization + Values Alignment Questions:
Framework: Expected Value + Risk Assessment Questions:
Framework: Values Alignment + Long-term Impact Questions:
Framework: Eisenhower Matrix + Opportunity Cost Questions:
Framework: WRAP + Pre-mortem Questions:
DECISION: [What am I deciding?]
TIMELINE: [When must I decide?]
STAKES: [How important/reversible is this?]
OPTIONS:
A. [Option 1]
B. [Option 2]
C. [Option 3]
D. Do nothing / stay the course
WHAT MATTERS MOST (Criteria):
1. [Criterion 1] - Weight: [1-10]
2. [Criterion 2] - Weight: [1-10]
3. [Criterion 3] - Weight: [1-10]
EVALUATION:
| Criterion 1 | Criterion 2 | Criterion 3 | Total
Option A | | | |
Option B | | | |
Option C | | | |
ASSUMPTIONS I'M MAKING:
-
-
WHAT COULD GO WRONG:
Option A risks:
Option B risks:
10/10/10:
In 10 minutes, I'll feel...
In 10 months, I'll feel...
In 10 years, I'll feel...
DECISION: [Choice]
WHY: [Rationale]
REVERSIBILITY: [ ] Can undo [ ] Hard to reverse [ ] Irreversible
REVIEW DATE: [When to reassess this decision]
DECIDING: [Question]
OPTIONS:
A. [Option A]
B. [Option B]
PROS/CONS:
Option A:
✓ Pro
✓ Pro
✗ Con
✗ Con
Option B:
✓ Pro
✓ Pro
✗ Con
✗ Con
GUT FEELING: [What does intuition say?]
LOGICAL CHOICE: [What does analysis say?]
IF THEY DISAGREE: [Explore the tension]
CHOICE: [Decision]
DECISION: [What I'm deciding]
MY CORE VALUES (in order):
1. [Value 1]
2. [Value 2]
3. [Value 3]
OPTION A:
How it aligns with Value 1:
How it aligns with Value 2:
How it aligns with Value 3:
OPTION B:
How it aligns with Value 1:
How it aligns with Value 2:
How it aligns with Value 3:
WHICH OPTION BEST HONORS WHO I WANT TO BE?
DECISION: [Choice]
What it is: Preferring things to stay the same Counter: Imagine you're starting fresh—would you choose current state?
What it is: Continuing because you've already invested Counter: Would you start this today knowing what you know?
What it is: Seeking evidence that supports what you already believe Counter: Actively seek disconfirming evidence
What it is: Over-relying on first piece of information Counter: Generate options before hearing others' opinions
What it is: Overweighting recent or vivid information Counter: Look at base rates and statistics, not just stories
What it is: Overestimating chances of success Counter: Run a pre-mortem, consider downside scenarios
What it is: Overthinking to avoid deciding Counter: Set information cutoff, recognize diminishing returns
This skill works well with:
User: "help me decide"
Skill Response: "I'll help you think through this clearly. Decision-making is a skill, and structure beats wishful thinking.
First, tell me: What are you deciding?
Be as specific as you can. For example:
What's your decision?"
User: "Should I take the new job offer or stay at my current company?"
Skill Response: "Classic career crossroads. This is a high-stakes, somewhat reversible decision (you could change jobs again, but there are costs).
Let's structure this properly. I have some clarifying questions:
Context Questions:
Timeline: When do you need to decide?
What's driving this?
The offers:
What matters most to you in a job? (Top 3)
Take your time—clarity here shapes everything else."
User: "Need to decide by Friday. Not actively unhappy but feeling stagnant. New job is 20% raise, more senior role, but longer commute. Most important to me: growth, work-life balance, compensation (in that order)"
Skill Response: "Got it. Growth is #1, balance #2, money #3. The new role offers more growth and money but potentially threatens balance (longer commute).
Let's use a structured framework: Weighted Decision Matrix
Here's how we'll score each option (1-10) on your criteria:
CRITERION 1: Growth/Learning Opportunity (Weight: 10 - your top priority)
CRITERION 2: Work-Life Balance (Weight: 8 - second priority)
CRITERION 3: Compensation (Weight: 6 - third priority)
Give me your honest ratings for each. Then we'll run the math and validate with other frameworks."
[Continues with evaluation, 10/10/10 test, regret minimization, and final recommendation based on user's values]
data-ai
Optimize YouTube videos for SEO, thumbnails, descriptions, and audience retention
testing
Design and facilitate effective workshops with agendas, activities, and outcomes
data-ai
Design and optimize AI-powered workflows for complex tasks
data-ai
Design and implement automated workflows to eliminate repetitive tasks and streamline processes