plugins/creating-instructions/skills/creating-instructions/SKILL.md
Creates GitHub Copilot instruction files for VS Code, including repository guidance and scoped `.instructions.md` rules. Use when encoding project conventions, choosing `applyTo` patterns, or shipping install-ready instruction examples with rationale and guardrails.
npx skillsauth add jaktestowac/awesome-copilot-for-testers creating-instructionsInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Use this skill when the goal is to package stable rules for GitHub Copilot instead of writing one-off guidance in chat. It helps turn repository conventions into clean instruction files that are easy to install, reason about, and maintain.
Use this skill when the user asks for things like:
.instructions.md file for these tests"applyTo pattern"Typical scenarios:
copilot-instructions.mdA strong instruction contribution usually includes:
applyTo pattern is part of the design, not an afterthought.Clarify or infer:
Before drafting:
Use this decision rule:
copilot-instructions.md when the rules apply to nearly every task in the repository*.instructions.md when the rules apply to a clear file pattern, directory, or workflow boundaryFor scoped instruction files:
description, applyTo, title, and name when helpfulFor repo-wide instruction files:
Always prepare:
Use these supporting resources:
./resources/copilot-instructions.template.md./resources/custom-instructions.template.instructions.md./resources/copilot-instructions.example.md./resources/custom-instructions.example.instructions.mdCheck the final result against ./resources/instructions-quality-checklist.md.
Pay extra attention to:
applyTo being narrow enough to avoid accidental always-on contextapplyTo: '**' for advice that only matters in one part of the repo./resources/copilot-instructions.template.md - repo-wide starting point for a project constitution./resources/custom-instructions.template.instructions.md - scoped instruction template with frontmatter./resources/copilot-instructions.example.md - worked repo-level example for a test automation repository./resources/custom-instructions.example.instructions.md - worked scoped example with concrete rules./resources/instructions-quality-checklist.md - final review checklist before shippingA task using this skill is complete when:
testing
Tests the customization assets themselves - skills, prompts, custom agents, instructions - the way a product is tested: activation cases that check an asset fires when it should and stays quiet when it should not, output-contract cases, safety cases, collision cases between assets competing for the same trigger, a weighted rubric scored blind, and a baseline-versus-candidate gate before an edit ships. Use when a skill is edited and nobody knows whether behaviour changed, when two skills fight over the same request, when a description is being tuned for discoverability, when a collection has grown past manual spot-checking, or when the request mentions skill evals, prompt regression, or "does this skill actually work".
development
Shapes QA output for the person who has to act on it: result and blocker in the first two lines, one decision per report, findings ordered by what they cost, the long artifact in a file and the decisions in the message, and magnitude stated in units the reader can count. Use when a report is accurate but nobody acts on it, when a finding set is too long to read under time pressure, when the same findings must be retold for a developer, a release manager, and an on-call engineer, or when the request mentions "too long", "make this readable", "just tell me what to do", "so what", or "summarize this for stakeholders". Pairs with unslop-answers, which makes the same report honest.
testing
Verifies that the lines and branches a change actually touched are executed by tests, using LCOV or Cobertura diff coverage instead of whole-repo percentages, and escalates uncovered high-risk changes into a blocking finding. Use when a pull request needs a coverage gate that unrelated tests cannot satisfy, when total coverage looks healthy but the diff is untested, when wiring diff coverage into CI, or when someone claims a change is covered because the suite is green.
development
Cuts AI tells from test code: tests that pass without proving anything, tautological assertions, mock-only tests, hardcoded waits, coverage theater, vague names, swallowed errors, retries used as fixes. Use whenever test code is written, changed, or reviewed, including tests produced as a side effect of a feature task, and when the request mentions "review these tests", "are these tests any good", "this test always passes", "this suite is flaky", or "clean up these tests". Must always apply to test code.