010-archive/backups-20251108/skill-structure-cleanup-20251108-073936/plugins/business-tools/excel-analyst-pro/skills/excel-variance-analyzer/SKILL.md
Automate budget vs actual variance analysis in Excel with flagging, commentary, and executive summaries for financial reporting and FP&A teams Activates when you request "excel variance analyzer" functionality.
npx skillsauth add intent-solutions-io/plugins-nixtla excel-variance-analyzerInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Automates variance analysis for monthly/quarterly financial reporting and budget reviews.
Automatically load this Skill when the user asks to:
Creates a comprehensive variance report with 3 sheets:
| Line Item | Budget | Actual | Variance | % Var | Flag | Commentary |
|-----------------|---------|---------|----------|-------|------|------------|
| Revenue | $1,000K | $950K | $(50K) | -5.0% | ⚠️ | Below plan |
| COGS | $600K | $580K | $(20K) | -3.3% | ✅ | Favorable |
| Gross Profit | $400K | $370K | $(30K) | -7.5% | 🔴 | Investigate|
| Operating Exp | $250K | $280K | $30K | 12.0% | 🔴 | Over budget|
| EBITDA | $150K | $90K | $(60K) | -40.0%| 🔴 | Miss |
📊 Performance Highlights
- Total Revenue: $950K (5.0% below budget)
- EBITDA: $90K (40.0% below budget)
- Key Driver: Operating expenses 12% over budget
🔴 Top 5 Unfavorable Variances:
1. EBITDA: $(60K) / -40.0%
2. Revenue: $(50K) / -5.0%
3. Operating Expenses: $30K / 12.0%
4. Gross Profit: $(30K) / -7.5%
5. Marketing: $25K / 25.0%
✅ Top 5 Favorable Variances:
1. COGS: $(20K) / -3.3%
2. Rent: $(5K) / -10.0%
3. Utilities: $(2K) / -8.0%
| Line Item | Jan Var% | Feb Var% | Mar Var% | Q1 Var% | Trend |
|-----------|----------|----------|----------|---------|-------|
| Revenue | -3% | -5% | -7% | -5% | ⬇️ |
| COGS | -2% | -4% | -3% | -3% | ➡️ |
Ask the user for:
Before analysis, check:
For each line item:
Absolute Variance = Actual - Budget
Percentage Variance = (Actual - Budget) / Budget × 100%
Sign Convention:
- Positive variance for revenue/profit = Favorable (✅)
- Negative variance for revenue/profit = Unfavorable (🔴)
- Positive variance for expenses = Unfavorable (🔴)
- Negative variance for expenses = Favorable (✅)
Apply flagging rules:
🔴 Red Flag (Critical):
- Revenue/profit >10% below budget
- Expenses >10% over budget
- Absolute variance >$100K
⚠️ Yellow Flag (Warning):
- Revenue/profit 5-10% below budget
- Expenses 5-10% over budget
- Absolute variance $50K-$100K
✅ Green (On Track):
- Variance within ±5%
- Absolute variance <$50K
For each flagged item, provide automated commentary:
Revenue Below Budget:
Revenue is $50K (5%) below budget. Possible drivers:
- Lower than expected sales volume
- Pricing pressure
- Delayed revenue recognition
- Seasonal factors
Recommend: Review sales pipeline and backlog
Expenses Over Budget:
Operating expenses are $30K (12%) over budget. Breakdown:
- Marketing: $25K over (new campaign)
- Travel: $8K over
- Utilities: $2K under
Recommend: Review Q2 marketing spend and ROI
Favorable Variances:
COGS is $20K (3.3%) under budget. Drivers:
- Lower raw material costs
- Improved operational efficiency
- Volume discounts from suppliers
Summarize for leadership:
📊 [Period] Financial Performance
Bottom Line:
- Revenue: [X%] vs budget ([favorable/unfavorable])
- EBITDA: [X%] vs budget ([favorable/unfavorable])
- Net Variance Impact: $[XXX]K
Key Takeaways:
1. [Primary driver of miss/beat]
2. [Secondary factor]
3. [Outlook for next period]
Action Items:
1. [Specific action needed]
2. [Follow-up required]
User: "Analyze Q1 budget vs actual"
Skill Response:
I'll analyze your Q1 variance. Let me load the data.
Do you have budget and actual data files, or would you like to paste them?
User: *pastes Excel data*
Perfect! I see data for Q1 2025. Setting analysis parameters:
- Period: Q1 2025 (Jan-Mar)
- Line items: 15 categories detected
- Materiality threshold: ±10% or ±$50K
Running variance analysis...
✅ Variance Analysis Complete!
📊 Q1 2025 PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
🎯 Overall Results:
- Revenue: $2,850K vs budget $3,000K (-5.0%) 🔴
- Gross Profit: $1,110K vs budget $1,200K (-7.5%) 🔴
- EBITDA: $270K vs budget $450K (-40.0%) 🔴
📉 Key Drivers of Underperformance:
1. Revenue Miss: $(150K) - 5% below plan
→ Slower than expected customer acquisition
→ Delayed Q1 enterprise deals to Q2
2. Operating Expenses Over: $90K - 12% above plan
→ Marketing campaign: $75K incremental spend
→ Headcount additions brought forward to Q1
🔍 Detailed Findings:
🔴 CRITICAL VARIANCES (>10%):
- Operating Expenses: $840K vs $750K (+12.0%) - $90K over
- EBITDA: $270K vs $450K (-40.0%) - $180K under
- Marketing: $325K vs $260K (+25.0%) - $65K over
⚠️ WARNING VARIANCES (5-10%):
- Revenue: $2,850K vs $3,000K (-5.0%) - $150K under
- Gross Profit: $1,110K vs $1,200K (-7.5%) - $90K under
✅ FAVORABLE VARIANCES:
- COGS: $1,740K vs $1,800K (-3.3%) - $60K favorable
- Facilities: $45K vs $50K (-10.0%) - $5K favorable
💡 RECOMMENDATIONS:
Immediate Actions:
1. Review Q2 sales pipeline - need $150K catch-up + Q2 plan
2. Evaluate marketing campaign ROI (Q1 spend +$65K)
3. Assess if Q1 revenue timing shift impacts full-year plan
Strategic Questions:
1. Is Q1 revenue miss timing (shifts to Q2) or lost?
2. Will marketing investment drive Q2-Q4 revenue?
3. Should we adjust full-year budget guidance?
📁 Report saved to: Q1_2025_Variance_Analysis.xlsx
Would you like me to:
- Add trend analysis vs Q4 2024?
- Create forecast scenarios for Q2?
- Drill into specific expense categories?
Response:
Let me drill into marketing expenses.
Marketing Variance Detail:
Budget: $260K
Actual: $325K
Variance: $65K (25% over)
Breakdown by subcategory:
- Digital Ads: $180K vs $150K (+$30K)
→ Google Ads campaign expanded
- Events: $75K vs $60K (+$15K)
→ Added trade show booth
- Content: $45K vs $40K (+$5K)
→ Video production
- Agencies: $25K vs $10K (+$15K)
→ New creative agency retainer
Primary driver: Digital ads campaign expansion (+$30K)
Was this spend planned but not budgeted, or truly incremental?
Would you like me to analyze marketing ROI?
Response:
I'll create a 3-month trend analysis.
Revenue Trend (Budget vs Actual):
| Month | Budget | Actual | Variance | Var% | Trend |
|-------|--------|--------|----------|------|-------|
| Jan | $1,000K| $970K | $(30K) | -3% | ⬇️ |
| Feb | $1,000K| $950K | $(50K) | -5% | ⬇️ |
| Mar | $1,000K| $930K | $(70K) | -7% | ⬇️ |
| Q1 | $3,000K| $2,850K| $(150K) | -5% | ⬇️ |
⚠️ ALERT: Revenue variance is worsening month-over-month
This suggests a structural issue, not timing:
- Jan: 97% of budget
- Feb: 95% of budget
- Mar: 93% of budget
Recommendation: Immediate deep-dive on sales execution
The Skill applies professional formatting:
- Green cells: Favorable variances (>5% better than budget)
- Yellow cells: Variances within ±5%
- Red cells: Unfavorable variances (>5% worse than budget)
- Currency: $1,000K or $1.0M (use K for thousands, M for millions)
- Percentages: 1 decimal place (5.0%)
- Variance: Show sign ($(50K) or $50K)
✅ = On track / Favorable
⚠️ = Warning / Needs attention
🔴 = Critical / Unfavorable
⬆️ = Improving trend
⬇️ = Worsening trend
➡️ = Flat trend
See resources folder for:
REFERENCE.md: Variance analysis best practicestemplates/: Sample variance reportsThis Skill provides automated variance analysis for:
For more complex analysis, you may need:
testing
This skill enables Claude to manage isolated test environments using Docker Compose, Testcontainers, and environment variables. It is used to create consistent, reproducible testing environments for software projects. Claude should use this skill when the user needs to set up a test environment with specific configurations, manage Docker Compose files for test infrastructure, set up programmatic container management with Testcontainers, manage environment variables for tests, or ensure cleanup after tests. Trigger terms include "test environment", "docker compose", "testcontainers", "environment variables", "isolated environment", "env-setup", and "test setup".
tools
This skill uses the test-doubles-generator plugin to automatically create mocks, stubs, spies, and fakes for unit testing. It analyzes dependencies in the code and generates appropriate test doubles based on the chosen testing framework, such as Jest, Sinon, or others. Use this skill when you need to generate test doubles, mocks, stubs, spies, or fakes to isolate units of code during testing. Trigger this skill by requesting test double generation or using the `/gen-doubles` or `/gd` command.
tools
This skill enables Claude to generate realistic test data for software development. It uses the test-data-generator plugin to create users, products, orders, and custom schemas for comprehensive testing. Use this skill when you need to populate databases, simulate user behavior, or create fixtures for automated tests. Trigger phrases include "generate test data", "create fake users", "populate database", "generate product data", "create test orders", or "generate data based on schema". This skill is especially useful for populating testing environments or creating sample data for demonstrations.
development
This skill analyzes code coverage metrics to identify untested code and generate comprehensive coverage reports. It is triggered when the user requests analysis of code coverage, identification of coverage gaps, or generation of coverage reports. The skill is best used to improve code quality by ensuring adequate test coverage and identifying areas for improvement. Use trigger terms like "analyze coverage", "code coverage report", "untested code", or the shortcut "cov".