plugins/developer-kit-specs/skills/ralph-loop/SKILL.md
Ralph Wiggum-inspired automation loop for specification-driven development. Orchestrates task implementation, review, cleanup, and synchronization using a Python script. Use when: user runs /loop command, user asks to automate task implementation, user wants to iterate through spec tasks step-by-step, or user wants to run development workflow automation with context window management. One step per invocation. State machine: init → choose_task → implementation → review → fix → cleanup → sync → update_done. Supports --from-task and --to-task for task range filtering. State persisted in fix_plan.json.
npx skillsauth add giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit ralph-loopInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
⚠️ WARNING: This skill was deprecated in favor of a new command
ralph-loop-v2that uses a Python orchestrator script. The old/specs:ralph-loopcommand will be removed soon. Please migrate to the new command.
⚠️ IMPORTANT: This skill uses a Python orchestrator script. Do NOT execute arbitrary bash commands. Use Bash ONLY to run ralph_loop.py. All task commands (like /developer-kit-specs:specs.task-implementation) are shown to the user to execute manually.
The Ralph Loop applies Geoffrey Huntley's "Ralph Wiggum as a Software Engineer" technique to specification-driven development. It uses a Python orchestrator script that manages a state machine: one invocation = one step, state persisted in fix_plan.json.
Key insight: Implementing + reviewing + syncing in one invocation explodes the context window. Solution: each loop iteration does exactly one step, saves state to fix_plan.json, and stops. The next iteration resumes from saved state.
Key improvement: The Python script ralph_loop.py handles all state management, task selection, and command generation. It does NOT execute task commands directly — it shows you the correct command to execute in your CLI.
/loop command for recurring automation┌─────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐
│ ralph_loop.py │────▶│ fix_plan.json │────▶│ User executes │
│ (orchestrator)│ │ (state file) │ │ command in CLI │
└─────────────────┘ └─────────────────┘ └─────────────────┘
│ │
│ ▼
│ ┌─────────────────┐
└──────────────────────────────────────│ Task result │
│ (success/ │
│ failure) │
└─────────────────┘
One Step Flow:
ralph_loop.py --action=loopfix_plan.json and determines current step/developer-kit-specs:specs.task-implementation)ralph_loop.py --action=loop againfix_plan.json state machine:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ state: "init" │
│ → --action=start: Initialize fix_plan.json │
│ → Load tasks from tasks/TASK-*.md files │
│ → Apply task_range filter │
│ │
│ state: "choose_task" │
│ → Pick next pending task (within range, deps satisfied)│
│ → No tasks in range → state: "complete" │
│ → Task found → state: "implementation" │
│ │
│ state: "implementation" │
│ → Show /developer-kit-specs:specs.task-implementation command │
│ → User executes, then runs loop again │
│ → Next state: "review" │
│ │
│ state: "review" ││ → Show /developer-kit-specs:specs.task-implementation --action=cleanup command│},{find: │
│ → User reviews results, then runs loop again │
│ → Issues found → state: "fix" (retry ≤ 3) │
│ → Clean → state: "cleanup" │
│ │
│ state: "fix" │
│ → Show commands to fix issues │
│ → User applies fixes, then runs loop again │
│ → Next state: "review" │
│ │
│ state: "cleanup" │
│ → Show /developer-kit-specs:specs.task-implementation --action=cleanup command│
│ → Next state: "sync" │
│ │
│ state: "sync" │
│ → Show /developer-kit-specs:specs.sync command │
│ → Next state: "update_done" │
│ │
│ state: "update_done" │
│ → Mark task done, commit git changes │
│ → Re-evaluate dependencies │
│ → state: "choose_task" │
│ │
│ state: "complete" | "failed" │
│ → Print result, stop │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
⚠️ CRITICAL: The fix_plan.json file MUST ALWAYS be located in:
docs/specs/[ID-feature]/_ralph_loop/fix_plan.json
This is enforced by the script to prevent LLMs from creating files in wrong locations.
Migration: If you have an old fix_plan.json in the root of your spec folder, the script will automatically migrate it to _ralph_loop/ on first run.
Run the Python script with --action=start to scan task files and create fix_plan.json in the correct location:
python3 plugins/developer-kit-specs/skills/ralph-loop/scripts/ralph_loop.py \
--action=start \
--spec=docs/specs/001-feature/ \
--from-task=TASK-036 \
--to-task=TASK-041
Run the script with --action=loop to get the current state and the command to execute:
python3 plugins/developer-kit-specs/skills/ralph-loop/scripts/ralph_loop.py \
--action=loop \
--spec=docs/specs/001-feature/
The script will show you the exact command to execute for the current step. Execute it in your CLI, then run the loop command again.
After executing the shown command, manually advance to the next step:
python3 plugins/developer-kit-specs/skills/ralph-loop/scripts/ralph_loop.py \
--action=next \
--spec=docs/specs/001-feature/
This updates fix_plan.json to the next state (e.g., implementation → review).
Check status anytime with --action=status:
python3 plugins/developer-kit-specs/skills/ralph-loop/scripts/ralph_loop.py \
--action=status \
--spec=docs/specs/001-feature/
python3 plugins/developer-kit-specs/skills/ralph-loop/scripts/ralph_loop.py \
--action=start \
--spec=docs/specs/001-feature/ \
--from-task=TASK-036 \
--to-task=TASK-041 \
--agent=claude
python3 plugins/developer-kit-specs/skills/ralph-loop/scripts/ralph_loop.py \
--action=loop \
--spec=docs/specs/001-feature/
The script will show you the command to execute. Run it, then run the loop again.
python3 plugins/developer-kit-specs/skills/ralph-loop/scripts/ralph_loop.py \
--action=status \
--spec=docs/specs/001-feature/
| Argument | Description |
|----------|-------------|
| --action | start (init), loop (run one step), status, resume, next (advance step) |
| --spec | Spec folder path (e.g. docs/specs/001-feature/) |
| --from-task | Start of task range (e.g. TASK-036) |
| --to-task | End of task range (e.g. TASK-041) |
| --agent | Default agent: claude, codex, copilot, kimi, gemini, glm4, minimax |
| --no-commit | Skip git commits (for testing) |
--action=start)The script:
tasks/TASK-*.md files in the spec folder--from-task and --to-task filtersfix_plan.json with full statechoose_task)The script:
fix_plan.json with current_taskimplementation)The script shows:
→ Implementation: TASK-037
Execute:
/developer-kit-specs:specs.task-implementation --task=TASK-037
After execution, update state:
python3 ralph_loop.py --action=loop --spec=docs/specs/001-feature/
review)The script shows:
→ Review: TASK-037 | Retry: 0/3
Execute:
/developer-kit-specs:specs.task-review --task=TASK-037
Review the generated review report, then update state:
python3 ralph_loop.py --action=loop --spec=docs/specs/001-feature/
fix) - If Review FailedIf issues found, script shows fix instructions. After fixes, user runs loop again.
cleanup)The script shows:
→ Cleanup: TASK-037
Execute:
/developer-kit-specs:specs.task-implementation --task=TASK-037 --action=cleanup
sync)The script shows:
→ Sync: TASK-037
Execute:
/developer-kit-specs:specs.sync docs/specs/001-feature/ --after-task=TASK-037
update_done)The script:
fix_plan.json--no-commit)choose_taskpython3 ralph_loop.py --action=start --spec=... --agent=codex
Specify agent in task file YAML frontmatter:
---
id: TASK-036
title: Refactor user service
status: pending
lang: java
agent: codex
---
Supported agents: claude, codex, copilot, kimi, gemini, glm4, minimax
For automatic scheduling every 5 minutes:
/loop 5m python3 plugins/developer-kit-specs/skills/ralph-loop/scripts/ralph_loop.py \
--action=loop \
--spec=docs/specs/001-feature/
This will repeatedly run the loop, showing you the next command each time.
Note: The Ralph Loop is now managed directly through the Python script. The deprecated /developer-kit-specs:specs.ralph-loop command has been removed.
Each task should be a separate file: tasks/TASK-XXX.md
---
id: TASK-036
title: Implement user authentication
status: pending
lang: java
dependencies: []
complexity: medium
agent: claude
---
## Description
Implement JWT-based authentication for the API.
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] Login endpoint returns JWT token
- [ ] Token validation middleware
- [ ] Refresh token mechanism
# Initialize
python3 ralph_loop.py --action=start \
--spec=docs/specs/001-feature/ \
--from-task=TASK-001 \
--to-task=TASK-005
# Loop until complete
while true; do
python3 ralph_loop.py --action=loop --spec=docs/specs/001-feature/
# Execute the shown command manually
# Then continue loop
done
# Start with specific range
/loop 5m python3 plugins/developer-kit-specs/skills/ralph-loop/scripts/ralph_loop.py \
--action=loop \
--spec=docs/specs/002-tdd-command \
--from-task=TASK-001 \
--to-task=TASK-010
# Initialize with Claude as default
python3 ralph_loop.py --action=start \
--spec=docs/specs/001-feature/ \
--agent=claude
# Some tasks have "agent: codex" in their frontmatter
# Those will show Codex-formatted commands
fix_plan.json, write to fix_plan.jsontask_rangestate.step values are ONLY: init, choose_task, implementation, review, fix, cleanup, sync, update_done, complete, failedRun --action=start first:
python3 ralph_loop.py --action=start --spec=docs/specs/001-feature/
The script will create fix_plan.json in the correct location:
docs/specs/001-feature/_ralph_loop/fix_plan.json
If you see a warning about the file being in the wrong location, the script will guide you through migration:
# Manual migration if needed
mkdir -p docs/specs/001-feature/_ralph_loop
mv docs/specs/001-feature/fix_plan.json docs/specs/001-feature/_ralph_loop/fix_plan.json
The script will automatically migrate old files on first run.
Run --action=start first:
python3 ralph_loop.py --action=start --spec=docs/specs/001-feature/
Ensure tasks are in tasks/TASK-XXX.md format with YAML frontmatter.
Check --agent parameter or task agent: frontmatter field.
references/state-machine.md - Complete state machine documentationreferences/multi-cli-integration.md - Multi-CLI setup guidereferences/loop-prompt-template.md - Prompt template for shell loopsdevelopment
Provides security review capability for TypeScript/Node.js applications, validates code against XSS, injection, CSRF, JWT/OAuth2 flaws, dependency CVEs, and secrets exposure. Use when performing security audits, before deployment, reviewing authentication/authorization implementations, or ensuring OWASP compliance for Express, NestJS, and Next.js. Triggers on "security review", "check for security issues", "TypeScript security audit".
development
Provides final code cleanup after task review approval. Removes debug logs, temporary comments, dead code, optimizes imports, and improves readability. Use when asked to clean up code, polish, finalize, tidy up, remove technical debt, or prepare code for completion after review. Not for refactoring logic or fixing bugs—focused solely on cosmetic and hygiene cleanup.
testing
Creates, updates, validates, and displays the architectural DNA of a project through two shared documents: docs/specs/architecture.md (technology stack, architectural rules, security constraints, AI guardrails) and docs/specs/ontology.md (domain glossary / Ubiquitous Language). Use BEFORE brainstorm as a project setup step, or at any point in the SDD lifecycle to validate specs/tasks against architecture principles. Triggers on 'create constitution', 'update constitution', 'constitution check', 'validate against constitution', 'project principles', 'architectural guardrails', 'setup project architecture', 'define ontology'.
tools
Provides Qwen Coder CLI delegation workflows for coding tasks using Qwen2.5-Coder and QwQ models, including English prompt formulation, execution flags, and safe result handling. Use when the user explicitly asks to use Qwen for tasks such as code generation, refactoring, debugging, or architectural analysis. Triggers on "use qwen", "use qwen coder", "delegate to qwen", "ask qwen", "second opinion from qwen", "qwen opinion", "continue with qwen", "qwen session".