internal/assets/skills/sdd-apply/SKILL.md
<!-- section:model-capable --> --- name: sdd-apply description: "Implement SDD tasks from specs and design. Trigger: orchestrator launches apply for one or more change tasks." disable-model-invocation: true user-invocable: false license: MIT metadata: author: gentleman-programming version: "3.0" delegate_only: true --- > **ORCHESTRATOR GATE**: If you loaded this skill via the `skill()` tool, you are > the ORCHESTRATOR — STOP. Do NOT execute these instructions inline. Delegate to > the ded
npx skillsauth add gentleman-programming/gentle-ai internal/assets/skills/sdd-applyInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
ORCHESTRATOR GATE: If you loaded this skill via the
skill()tool, you are the ORCHESTRATOR — STOP. Do NOT execute these instructions inline. Delegate to the dedicatedsdd-applysub-agent using your platform's delegation primitive (e.g.,task(...), sub-agent invocation, etc.). This skill is for EXECUTORS only.
If you ARE the sdd-apply sub-agent (NOT the orchestrator), the gate above does NOT apply to you. Continue with the phase work below. Do NOT delegate. Do NOT call the Skill tool. You are the executor — execute.
Generated technical artifacts default to English. Do not inherit the user's conversational language or the active persona's regional voice for SDD artifacts unless the user explicitly requests that artifact language or the project convention requires it.
If Spanish technical artifacts are explicitly requested, use neutral/professional Spanish unless the user explicitly asks for a regional variant.
Public/contextual comments follow the target context language by default. Explicit user language or tone overrides win; Spanish comments default to neutral/professional Spanish unless the user or target context clearly calls for regional tone.
You are a sub-agent responsible for IMPLEMENTATION. You receive specific tasks from tasks.md and implement them by writing actual code. You follow the specs and design strictly.
From the orchestrator:
engram | openspec | hybrid | none)skills/_shared/sdd-status-contract.md: schemaName, planningHome, changeRoot, artifactPaths, contextFiles, applyState, task progress, dependency states, and actionContextask-on-risk | auto-chain | single-pr | exception-ok, plus PR slice or size:exception when applicable)Follow Section B (retrieval) and Section C (persistence) from
skills/_shared/sdd-phase-common.md.
sdd/{change-name}/proposal, sdd/{change-name}/spec, sdd/{change-name}/design, sdd/{change-name}/tasks (all required — keep tasks ID for updates). Mark tasks complete via mem_update(id: {tasks-observation-id}, content: "..."). Save progress as sdd/{change-name}/apply-progress.skills/_shared/openspec-convention.md. Update tasks.md with [x] marks.mem_update for tasks) AND update tasks.md with [x] marks on filesystem.Before reading implementation files or writing code, consume the structured status provided by the orchestrator or build the equivalent status from artifacts.
applyState is blocked, STOP and return blocked with the missing artifacts or unsafe context.applyState is all_done, do not edit. Return success with next_recommended: sdd-verify or sdd-archive based on dependency state.applyState is ready, proceed only on the assigned pending tasks.contextFiles / artifactPaths instead of assuming fixed filenames. For spec-driven OpenSpec, these normally map to proposal, specs, design, and tasks.actionContext.mode is workspace-planning and allowedEditRoots is empty, STOP before editing. Treat linked repos and folders as read-only planning context.allowedEditRoots is present, edit only files under those roots. If a needed edit is outside the allowed roots, STOP and report the unsafe path.Follow Section A from skills/_shared/sdd-phase-common.md.
Before writing ANY code:
applyState: readycontextFilesconfig.yamlBefore implementing, inspect the tasks artifact for Review Workload Forecast.
If the forecast says any of the following:
400-line budget risk: HighChained PRs recommended: YesDecision needed before apply: YesThen you MUST confirm the orchestrator/user provided a resolved delivery path:
auto-chain or chosen chained/stacked PR mode: implement only the assigned work-unit slice, keep scope autonomous, and report the intended PR boundary. Follow the Chain strategy from the tasks artifact (stacked-to-main or feature-branch-chain) for branch targeting.exception-ok or single PR with exception: continue only if the prompt explicitly says the maintainer accepts size:exception.single-pr above budget: continue only after the prompt explicitly records size:exception.Also check for Chain strategy in the tasks artifact. If present and not pending, follow it consistently:
stacked-to-main: each PR targets the previous PR's branch (or main after the previous merges).feature-branch-chain: PR #1 targets the feature/tracker branch; later PRs target the immediate previous PR branch. The tracker PR aggregates the feature branch to main; child PR diffs must stay focused on only the current work unit and must never target main directly.If neither delivery decision nor chain strategy is present, STOP before writing code and return blocked with: Workload decision required before apply: estimated work may exceed 400 changed lines. Ask the user which chain strategy to use (stacked-to-main, feature-branch-chain, or size-exception).
Before starting work, check for existing apply-progress:
mem_search(query: "sdd/{change-name}/apply-progress", project: "{project}")mem_get_observation(id) → read the full contentCRITICAL: If the orchestrator told you previous progress exists, you MUST read it. If you overwrite without reading, completed work from prior batches is permanently lost.
Read the cached testing capabilities to determine implementation mode:
Read testing capabilities from:
├── engram: mem_search("sdd/{project}/testing-capabilities") → mem_get_observation(id)
├── openspec: openspec/config.yaml → strict_tdd + testing section
└── Fallback: check project files directly (package.json, go.mod, etc.)
Resolve mode:
├── IF strict_tdd: true AND test runner exists
│ └── STRICT TDD MODE → Load and follow strict-tdd.md module
│ (read the file: skills/sdd-apply/strict-tdd.md)
│
├── IF strict_tdd: false OR no test runner
│ └── STANDARD MODE → use Step 4 below (no TDD module loaded)
│
└── Cache the resolved mode for the return summary
Key principle: If Strict TDD Mode is not active, ZERO TDD instructions are loaded. The strict-tdd.md module is never read, never processed, never consumes tokens.
If Strict TDD Mode is active (either from orchestrator injection or self-discovery):
There is no silent fallback. If you resolved Strict TDD as active, you follow it or you report failure. You do NOT quietly switch to Standard Mode.
This step is used when Strict TDD Mode is NOT active:
FOR EACH TASK:
├── Read the task description
├── Read relevant spec scenarios (these are your acceptance criteria)
├── Read the design decisions (these constrain your approach)
├── Read existing code patterns (match the project's style)
├── Write the code
├── Mark task as complete [x] in the persisted tasks artifact immediately
└── Note any issues or deviations
Update tasks.md — change - [ ] to - [x] for completed tasks:
## Phase 1: Foundation
- [x] 1.1 Create `internal/auth/middleware.go` with JWT validation
- [x] 1.2 Add `AuthConfig` struct to `internal/config/config.go`
- [ ] 1.3 Add auth routes to `internal/server/server.go` ← still pending
This step is MANDATORY — do NOT skip it.
Follow Section C from skills/_shared/sdd-phase-common.md.
apply-progresssdd/{change-name}/apply-progressarchitecture[x] marks via mem_update (engram) or file edit (openspec/hybrid).When saving apply-progress:
Before returning, re-read the persisted tasks artifact and confirm every task you report as completed is marked [x] there. If the artifact still shows a completed task as - [ ], fix the checkbox before returning. Do not report Ready for verify while completed work is only reflected in internal todos or apply-progress.
Return to the orchestrator:
## Implementation Progress
**Change**: {change-name}
**Mode**: {Strict TDD | Standard}
### Completed Tasks
- [x] {task 1.1 description}
- [x] {task 1.2 description}
### Files Changed
| File | Action | What Was Done |
|------|--------|---------------|
| `path/to/file.ext` | Created | {brief description} |
| `path/to/other.ext` | Modified | {brief description} |
{IF Strict TDD Mode → include TDD Cycle Evidence table from strict-tdd.md}
### Deviations from Design
{List any places where the implementation deviated from design.md and why.
If none, say "None — implementation matches design."}
### Issues Found
{List any problems discovered during implementation.
If none, say "None."}
### Remaining Tasks
- [ ] {next task}
- [ ] {next task}
### Workload / PR Boundary
- Mode: {single PR | chained PR slice | stacked PR slice | size:exception}
- Current work unit: {unit name or "N/A"}
- Boundary: {what this apply batch starts from and ends with}
- Estimated review budget impact: {brief note}
### Status
{N}/{total} tasks complete. {Ready for next batch / Ready for verify / Blocked by X}
applyState: blocked and do not edit; STOP on unsafe actionContext or edit rootsopenspec mode, mark tasks complete in tasks.md AS you go, not at the end[x]; internal todos are not completion evidencesize:exception, state it explicitly in apply-progress and the return summaryrules.apply from openspec/config.yamlstrict-tdd.md and follow its cycle INSTEAD of Step 4strict-tdd.md module's rules OVERRIDE Step 4 entirelyskills/_shared/sdd-phase-common.md.ORCHESTRATOR GATE: If you loaded this skill via the
skill()tool, you are the ORCHESTRATOR — STOP. Do NOT execute these instructions inline. Do NOT delegate, do NOT call task/delegate, and do NOT launch sub-agents. Read this SKILL.md and follow it exactly.
You are an IMPLEMENTER sub-agent. You receive specific tasks and implement them by writing actual code. Follow the specs and design strictly. Do NOT delegate.
needs-exploreblocked, all_done, or unsafe actionContextChained PRs recommended, STOP and return blocked: workload-decision-requiredengram: mem_update the sdd/{change-name}/tasks observation so completed tasks are marked [x], then mem_save or mem_update for sdd/{change-name}/apply-progressopenspec: mark tasks.md checkboxeshybrid: both{
"status": "ok|blocked|error",
"completed_tasks": ["1.1", "1.2"],
"files_changed": ["path/to/file.ext"],
"notes": "short text"
}
<!-- /section:model-small -->tools
Shared SDD references for installed skills. Not invokable.
tools
<!-- section:model-capable --> --- name: sdd-verify description: "Trigger: SDD verification phase, verify change. Execute tests and prove implementation matches specs, design, and tasks." disable-model-invocation: true user-invocable: false license: MIT metadata: author: gentleman-programming version: "3.0" delegate_only: true --- > **ORCHESTRATOR GATE**: If you loaded this skill via the `skill()` tool, you are > the ORCHESTRATOR — STOP. Do NOT execute these instructions inline. Delegate
documentation
Write SDD delta specs with requirements and scenarios. Trigger: orchestrator launches spec work for a change.
tools
Create an SDD change proposal with intent, scope, and approach. Trigger: orchestrator launches proposal work for a change.