excatt/audit

Audit Skill

Project-specific verification rules that generic linters cannot enforce.

| Skill | Checks | |-------|--------| | /verify | Build, types, lint, test, security | | /audit | Business logic, architecture patterns, naming conventions | | /gap-analysis | Design doc vs implementation matchRate |

Mode Selection

/audit          → rules exist? → RUN mode (execute rules)
                → no rules?   → MANAGE mode (bootstrap)
/audit manage   → MANAGE mode (create/delete/sync rules)

Rules location: .claude/audit-rules/*.md

---

RUN Mode

Step 1: Collect & Match

Read all .claude/audit-rules/*.md. Match each rule's scope against changed files:

BASE=$(git remote show origin 2>/dev/null | grep 'HEAD branch' | awk '{print $NF}')
BASE=${BASE:-main}
git diff "$BASE"...HEAD --name-only

Skip rules whose scope has no matching changes.

Auto-exempt files (always skip, no rule needed):

• Lock files: pnpm-lock.yaml, uv.lock, package-lock.json, Cargo.lock
• Generated/build output: dist/, build/, .next/, __pycache__/
• Docs: README.md, CHANGELOG.md, LICENSE
• Test fixtures: fixtures/, __fixtures__/, test-data/
• Vendor/third-party: vendor/, node_modules/
• CI/CD config: .github/, .gitlab-ci.yml, Dockerfile
• CLAUDE.md and .claude/ internals

Step 2: Execute

For each matched rule:

1. Run bash commands from ## Check section (if any)
2. AI-analyze results against ## Pass Criteria
3. Classify: PASS / FAIL / WARN / SKIP

Step 3: Report

AUDIT REPORT
=============
  api-response-format      PASS
  error-handling           FAIL  2 violations
    src/api/users.ts:45    bare catch without error type
    src/api/posts.ts:78    empty catch block
  naming-convention        PASS
---------------------------------------------
  Rules: 3 | Passed: 2 | Failed: 1
  Status: NEEDS FIX

Status: all pass → CLEAR / any error-severity fail → NEEDS FIX / warning-only → REVIEW

Step 4: Fix (if issues found)

Ask user via AskUserQuestion:

1. Apply All Fixes — Automatically apply all recommended fixes
2. Review Each Fix — Approve each fix individually
3. Skip Fixes — Report only, make no changes

After fixes, re-run only failed rules and show before/after comparison.

---

MANAGE Mode

Bootstrap (No Rules)

Detect project type from config files and propose seed rules:

| Signal | Type | Suggested Rules | |--------|------|-----------------| | next in package.json | Next.js | Server/Client separation, API response format | | fastapi in pyproject.toml | FastAPI | HTTPException usage, router naming | | express/nest in package.json | Node API | Error middleware, response wrapper | | Any project | Universal | Naming convention |

Change Analysis

git diff "$BASE"...HEAD --name-only --stat

Compare changed domains against existing rule scopes → propose CREATE/UPDATE/DELETE.

User Confirmation

Always confirm before creating or deleting rules:

Proposed:
  + api-response-format   (new, covers src/api/**)
  - legacy-auth-check     (stale, files removed)

Apply? [Y/n]

---

Rule Format

Each rule is a markdown file with YAML frontmatter (name, scope, severity) and structured sections (What, Check, Pass Criteria, Examples).

Full guide: references/rule-format.md Example rules: references/examples/

---

Integration

Pre-commit flow: /verify → /audit → commit

Review loop: Implement → Spec Review → Quality Review → /verify → /audit → Complete