src/hestai_mcp/_bundled_hub/library/skills/review-context/SKILL.md
===SKILL:REVIEW_CONTEXT=== META: TYPE::SKILL VERSION::"1.0.0" STATUS::ACTIVE PURPOSE::"Path-specific review instructions for CRS. Encodes domain knowledge about file categories, review focus areas, and format exceptions to prevent false positives and guide reviewers to high-value findings." §1::CORE AUTHORITY::ADVISORY[review_focus_guidance] PHASE::PRE_REVIEW[loaded_before_CRS_begins_review_judgement] COMPLEMENTS::[review-preflight<context_collection>,review-discipline<confidence>,revie
npx skillsauth add elevanaltd/hestai-mcp src/hestai_mcp/_bundled_hub/library/skills/review-contextInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
===SKILL:REVIEW_CONTEXT=== META: TYPE::SKILL VERSION::"1.0.0" STATUS::ACTIVE PURPOSE::"Path-specific review instructions for CRS. Encodes domain knowledge about file categories, review focus areas, and format exceptions to prevent false positives and guide reviewers to high-value findings."
§1::CORE AUTHORITY::ADVISORY[review_focus_guidance] PHASE::PRE_REVIEW[loaded_before_CRS_begins_review_judgement] COMPLEMENTS::[review-preflight<context_collection>,review-discipline<confidence>,review-prioritization<triage>]
§2::PATH_INSTRUCTIONS // Path-specific review focus areas. // CRS loads these instructions to calibrate review depth and focus per file type. // CRS-native path instructions for calibrating review depth per file type. SOURCE_FILES::[ PATHS::"src//*.py", FOCUS::[security,correctness,type_safety,error_handling], STANDARDS::[ "All public functions must have docstrings", "Line length 100 chars", "Project uses ruff for linting and mypy for type checking" ] ] TEST_FILES::[ PATHS::"tests//.py", FOCUS::[edge_case_coverage,pytest_marker_usage,test_structure], STANDARDS::[ "Test files mirror src/ structure", "Check test coverage of edge cases", "Proper use of pytest markers (smoke, unit, behavior, contract)" ], ANTI_PATTERN::"Do not suggest restructuring test file layout" ] BUNDLED_HUB::[ PATHS::"src/hestai_mcp/_bundled_hub/**", FOCUS::[structural_correctness], STANDARDS::[ "Bundled governance files (mirrored to .hestai-sys/ at install time)", "Review for structural correctness only" ], FORMAT_EXCEPTION::"Do not flag OCTAVE format (.oct.md) for markdown issues - these use intentionally non-standard notation" ] OCTAVE_FILES::[ PATHS::"/*.oct.md", FOCUS::[structural_completeness,semantic_correctness], FORMAT_EXCEPTION::"OCTAVE format files use domain-specific notation. Do not flag for markdown lint, missing headers, or unconventional formatting. Review for structural completeness and semantic correctness only." ] GITHUB_WORKFLOWS::[ PATHS::".github/workflows/", FOCUS::[event_triggers,secret_handling,job_dependency_chains,shell_injection_risks], STANDARDS::[ "Check for correct event triggers", "Proper secret handling", "Job dependency chains", "Shell injection risks" ] ]
§3::GOVERNANCE_FILE_COVERAGE // CRS must maintain review coverage for governance-sensitive paths even without // external bot reviewers. These paths require elevated attention. ELEVATED_PATHS::[ "src/hestai_mcp/_bundled_hub/standards/→RULE_and_STANDARD_files", "src/hestai_mcp/_bundled_hub/library/agents/→AGENT_DEFINITION_files", "src/hestai_mcp/_bundled_hub/library/skills/**→SKILL_files", ".github/workflows/review-gate.yml→META_CONTROL_PLANE", "scripts/validate_review.py→META_CONTROL_PLANE" ]
§5::ANCHOR_KERNEL TARGET::calibrate_review_depth_and_focus_per_file_type NEVER::[skip_path_instruction_lookup,flag_octave_for_markdown_lint,suggest_test_file_restructuring,ignore_governance_file_coverage] MUST::[apply_path_specific_focus_areas,respect_format_exceptions_for_octave,maintain_governance_file_review_coverage,check_elevated_paths_with_increased_scrutiny] GATE::"Are path-specific review instructions loaded and applied before CRS begins file-level review judgement?"
===END===
tools
Supabase test harness patterns including local Supabase setup, test user creation via Auth Admin API, RLS testing, migration testing (db_reset), seed sequences, rate limiting, and environment detection. Use when setting up Supabase testing infrastructure, creating test users, troubleshooting Supabase test failures, or implementing RLS validation. Triggers on: supabase test setup, test user creation, supabase local testing, RLS testing, migration testing, supabase test harness, auth test helpers.
tools
Supabase operational knowledge for migrations, RLS optimization, MCP tool benchmarks, and ADR-003 compliance. Use when validating database migrations, optimizing Row-Level Security policies, checking MCP tool performance, or ensuring Supabase operational standards. Triggers on: migration validation, RLS patterns, Supabase benchmarks, ADR-003, database state tracking, schema governance.
tools
Vercel preview deployment access patterns including automation bypass, protected preview authentication, and CI integration
tools
===SKILL:VALIDATION_METHODOLOGY=== META: TYPE::SKILL VERSION::"1.0" PURPOSE::"Rigorous 6-step reality enforcement protocol" §1::CORE_PROTOCOL VALIDATION_METHODOLOGY::[ STEP_1_NATURAL_LAW::"Identify physics constraints, thermodynamic limits, information theory bounds", STEP_2_RESOURCE_REALITY::"Inventory actual available resources (time, people, tools, budget) with evidence", STEP_3_CAPABILITY_ASSESSMENT::"Validate team skills, tool availability, knowledge gaps against requirements",