duruii/paper-summary

paper-summary

This skill is a research-grade academic paper analysis workflow. It does not only summarize papers. It extracts verifiable, structured scientific knowledge and evaluates quality before finalizing output.

Core Features

• Structured academic information extraction
• Evidence-grounded outputs with traceable locations
• Hallucination minimization through strict source constraints
• LLM-as-Judge quality scoring
• Self-refinement loop for quality improvement

Supported Inputs

Exactly one paper per run:

• arXiv links
• arXiv IDs
• Local PDF files

If the user provides multiple papers, ask the user to choose one and do not run batch analysis.

Workflow (Strict Execution)

Step 1: Document Parsing

Identify and map core sections:

• Abstract
• Introduction
• Method
• Experiments
• Conclusion

Step 2: Structured Extraction

Extract the following elements strictly from the paper:

Research Problem

• State the exact problem being solved.
• Avoid generic or field-level statements.

Methodology

• Core idea
• Model or framework
• Key techniques

Key Contributions

• Include explicit contributions only.
• Prefer author-provided numbered contributions when available.

Experimental Results

• Dataset names
• Metrics (for example: Accuracy, BLEU, F1)
• Quantitative improvements

Limitations

• Include only if explicitly mentioned.
• Otherwise return: "未明确说明（Not explicitly stated）"

Step 3: Evidence Grounding (Critical)

For every extracted claim:

• Provide direct evidence from the paper.
• Quote or paraphrase with location markers (section, table, figure, or paragraph reference when possible).

Example:

Method: The paper proposes a transformer-based architecture for sequence modeling.

Evidence: "We introduce a transformer-based model..." (Method section)

Step 4: Initial Summary Generation

Generate a structured summary only from extracted elements and grounded evidence.

Step 5: LLM-as-Judge Evaluation

Score the draft summary:

• Accuracy (0-5): factual correctness against source
• Completeness (0-5): required fields sufficiently covered
• Coverage (0-5): core problem, method, contribution, results included
• Hallucination (0-5): unsupported content level (higher means worse)

Compute:

• final_score = accuracy + completeness + coverage + (5 - hallucination)
• Use scores for internal quality control and refinement only.
• Do not expose score JSON in user-facing final output.

Step 6: Self-Refinement Loop

If any condition is true:

• final_score < 16
• accuracy < 4
• hallucination > 1

Then:

• Identify weak sections and unsupported claims.
• Regenerate only weak parts with stronger grounding.
• Repeat at most 2 iterations.

Step 7: Evaluation Logging for Iteration

When possible, append a compact test log:

• Paper identifier
• Scores before and after refinement
• Main error types fixed (missing result, vague method, unsupported claim)
• Final pass or fail status

Use this log to identify recurring failure patterns and improve prompts or structure.

Final Output Structure

Final answer must be in Chinese.

标题

研究问题

• 证据

方法

• 证据

关键贡献

• 证据

实验结果（包含具体数字）

• 证据

局限性

• 证据

Hard Constraints (Mandatory)

• Do not hallucinate missing information.
• If uncertain, output exactly: "未明确说明（Not explicitly stated）".
• Include evidence for every major claim.
• Include quantitative results when available.
• Do not generalize beyond paper content.
• Process exactly one paper per invocation.
• If multiple papers are provided, stop and ask the user to pick one paper first.
• Do not output LLM-as-Judge score JSON to users.
• Use Chinese headings and Chinese narrative in final output.

Example Command

summary paper https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.13712

Scripts (Optional)

• Aggregate smoke test outcomes: python scripts/evaluate_smoke_results.py references/smoke-results --json

Intended Use

• Literature review acceleration
• Research comparison
• Academic analysis
• Relevance screening

Notes

This is a research-oriented skill, not a casual summarization helper. Prioritize precision, verifiability, and scientific rigor over style.