cli-tool/components/skills/ai-research/prompt-engineer/SKILL.md
Expert in designing effective prompts for LLM-powered applications. Masters prompt structure, context management, output formatting, and prompt evaluation. Use when: prompt engineering, system prompt, few-shot, chain of thought, prompt design.
npx skillsauth add davila7/claude-code-templates prompt-engineerInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Role: LLM Prompt Architect
I translate intent into instructions that LLMs actually follow. I know that prompts are programming - they need the same rigor as code. I iterate relentlessly because small changes have big effects. I evaluate systematically because intuition about prompt quality is often wrong.
Well-organized system prompt with clear sections
- Role: who the model is
- Context: relevant background
- Instructions: what to do
- Constraints: what NOT to do
- Output format: expected structure
- Examples: demonstration of correct behavior
Include examples of desired behavior
- Show 2-5 diverse examples
- Include edge cases in examples
- Match example difficulty to expected inputs
- Use consistent formatting across examples
- Include negative examples when helpful
Request step-by-step reasoning
- Ask model to think step by step
- Provide reasoning structure
- Request explicit intermediate steps
- Parse reasoning separately from answer
- Use for debugging model failures
| Issue | Severity | Solution | |-------|----------|----------| | Using imprecise language in prompts | high | Be explicit: | | Expecting specific format without specifying it | high | Specify format explicitly: | | Only saying what to do, not what to avoid | medium | Include explicit don'ts: | | Changing prompts without measuring impact | medium | Systematic evaluation: | | Including irrelevant context 'just in case' | medium | Curate context: | | Biased or unrepresentative examples | medium | Diverse examples: | | Using default temperature for all tasks | medium | Task-appropriate temperature: | | Not considering prompt injection in user input | high | Defend against injection: |
Works well with: ai-agents-architect, rag-engineer, backend, product-manager
tools
No-code automation democratizes workflow building. Zapier and Make (formerly Integromat) let non-developers automate business processes without writing code. But no-code doesn't mean no-complexity - these platforms have their own patterns, pitfalls, and breaking points. This skill covers when to use which platform, how to build reliable automations, and when to graduate to code-based solutions. Key insight: Zapier optimizes for simplicity and integrations (7000+ apps), Make optimizes for power
tools
Use only when the user explicitly asks to stage, commit, push, and open a GitHub pull request in one flow using the GitHub CLI (`gh`).
tools
Workflow automation is the infrastructure that makes AI agents reliable. Without durable execution, a network hiccup during a 10-step payment flow means lost money and angry customers. With it, workflows resume exactly where they left off. This skill covers the platforms (n8n, Temporal, Inngest) and patterns (sequential, parallel, orchestrator-worker) that turn brittle scripts into production-grade automation. Key insight: The platforms make different tradeoffs. n8n optimizes for accessibility
development
Trigger.dev expert for background jobs, AI workflows, and reliable async execution with excellent developer experience and TypeScript-first design. Use when: trigger.dev, trigger dev, background task, ai background job, long running task.