cli-tool/components/skills/development/nodejs-best-practices/SKILL.md
Node.js development principles and decision-making. Framework selection, async patterns, security, and architecture. Teaches thinking, not copying.
npx skillsauth add davila7/claude-code-templates nodejs-best-practicesInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Principles and decision-making for Node.js development in 2025. Learn to THINK, not memorize code patterns.
This skill teaches decision-making principles, not fixed code to copy.
What are you building?
│
├── Edge/Serverless (Cloudflare, Vercel)
│ └── Hono (zero-dependency, ultra-fast cold starts)
│
├── High Performance API
│ └── Fastify (2-3x faster than Express)
│
├── Enterprise/Team familiarity
│ └── NestJS (structured, DI, decorators)
│
├── Legacy/Stable/Maximum ecosystem
│ └── Express (mature, most middleware)
│
└── Full-stack with frontend
└── Next.js API Routes or tRPC
| Factor | Hono | Fastify | Express | |--------|------|---------|---------| | Best for | Edge, serverless | Performance | Legacy, learning | | Cold start | Fastest | Fast | Moderate | | Ecosystem | Growing | Good | Largest | | TypeScript | Native | Excellent | Good | | Learning curve | Low | Medium | Low |
Node.js 22+: --experimental-strip-types
├── Run .ts files directly
├── No build step needed for simple projects
└── Consider for: scripts, simple APIs
ESM (import/export)
├── Modern standard
├── Better tree-shaking
├── Async module loading
└── Use for: new projects
CommonJS (require)
├── Legacy compatibility
├── More npm packages support
└── Use for: existing codebases, some edge cases
| Runtime | Best For | |---------|----------| | Node.js | General purpose, largest ecosystem | | Bun | Performance, built-in bundler | | Deno | Security-first, built-in TypeScript |
Request Flow:
│
├── Controller/Route Layer
│ ├── Handles HTTP specifics
│ ├── Input validation at boundary
│ └── Calls service layer
│
├── Service Layer
│ ├── Business logic
│ ├── Framework-agnostic
│ └── Calls repository layer
│
└── Repository Layer
├── Data access only
├── Database queries
└── ORM interactions
Pattern:
├── Create custom error classes
├── Throw from any layer
├── Catch at top level (middleware)
└── Format consistent response
Client gets:
├── Appropriate HTTP status
├── Error code for programmatic handling
├── User-friendly message
└── NO internal details (security!)
Logs get:
├── Full stack trace
├── Request context
├── User ID (if applicable)
└── Timestamp
| Situation | Status | When | |-----------|--------|------| | Bad input | 400 | Client sent invalid data | | No auth | 401 | Missing or invalid credentials | | No permission | 403 | Valid auth, but not allowed | | Not found | 404 | Resource doesn't exist | | Conflict | 409 | Duplicate or state conflict | | Validation | 422 | Schema valid but business rules fail | | Server error | 500 | Our fault, log everything |
| Pattern | Use When |
|---------|----------|
| async/await | Sequential async operations |
| Promise.all | Parallel independent operations |
| Promise.allSettled | Parallel where some can fail |
| Promise.race | Timeout or first response wins |
I/O-bound (async helps):
├── Database queries
├── HTTP requests
├── File system
└── Network operations
CPU-bound (async doesn't help):
├── Crypto operations
├── Image processing
├── Complex calculations
└── → Use worker threads or offload
Where to validate:
├── API entry point (request body/params)
├── Before database operations
├── External data (API responses, file uploads)
└── Environment variables (startup)
| Library | Best For | |---------|----------| | Zod | TypeScript first, inference | | Valibot | Smaller bundle (tree-shakeable) | | ArkType | Performance critical | | Yup | Existing React Form usage |
Trust nothing:
├── Query params → validate
├── Request body → validate
├── Headers → verify
├── Cookies → validate
├── File uploads → scan
└── External APIs → validate response
| Type | Purpose | Tools | |------|---------|-------| | Unit | Business logic | node:test, Vitest | | Integration | API endpoints | Supertest | | E2E | Full flows | Playwright |
node --test src/**/*.test.ts
├── No external dependency
├── Good coverage reporting
└── Watch mode available
Before implementing:
Remember: Node.js best practices are about decision-making, not memorizing patterns. Every project deserves fresh consideration based on its requirements.
tools
No-code automation democratizes workflow building. Zapier and Make (formerly Integromat) let non-developers automate business processes without writing code. But no-code doesn't mean no-complexity - these platforms have their own patterns, pitfalls, and breaking points. This skill covers when to use which platform, how to build reliable automations, and when to graduate to code-based solutions. Key insight: Zapier optimizes for simplicity and integrations (7000+ apps), Make optimizes for power
tools
Use only when the user explicitly asks to stage, commit, push, and open a GitHub pull request in one flow using the GitHub CLI (`gh`).
tools
Workflow automation is the infrastructure that makes AI agents reliable. Without durable execution, a network hiccup during a 10-step payment flow means lost money and angry customers. With it, workflows resume exactly where they left off. This skill covers the platforms (n8n, Temporal, Inngest) and patterns (sequential, parallel, orchestrator-worker) that turn brittle scripts into production-grade automation. Key insight: The platforms make different tradeoffs. n8n optimizes for accessibility
development
Trigger.dev expert for background jobs, AI workflows, and reliable async execution with excellent developer experience and TypeScript-first design. Use when: trigger.dev, trigger dev, background task, ai background job, long running task.