cli-tool/components/skills/ai-research/emerging-techniques-moe-training/SKILL.md
Train Mixture of Experts (MoE) models using DeepSpeed or HuggingFace. Use when training large-scale models with limited compute (5× cost reduction vs dense models), implementing sparse architectures like Mixtral 8x7B or DeepSeek-V3, or scaling model capacity without proportional compute increase. Covers MoE architectures, routing mechanisms, load balancing, expert parallelism, and inference optimization.
npx skillsauth add davila7/claude-code-templates moe-trainingInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Use MoE Training when you need to:
Notable MoE Models: Mixtral 8x7B (Mistral AI), DeepSeek-V3, Switch Transformers (Google), GLaM (Google), NLLB-MoE (Meta)
# DeepSpeed with MoE support
pip install deepspeed>=0.6.0
# Megatron-DeepSpeed for large-scale training
git clone https://github.com/microsoft/Megatron-DeepSpeed
cd Megatron-DeepSpeed
pip install -r requirements.txt
# Alternative: HuggingFace Transformers
pip install transformers accelerate
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
class MoELayer(nn.Module):
"""Sparse Mixture of Experts layer."""
def __init__(self, hidden_size, num_experts=8, top_k=2):
super().__init__()
self.num_experts = num_experts
self.top_k = top_k
# Expert networks (FFN)
self.experts = nn.ModuleList([
nn.Sequential(
nn.Linear(hidden_size, 4 * hidden_size),
nn.GELU(),
nn.Linear(4 * hidden_size, hidden_size)
)
for _ in range(num_experts)
])
# Gating network (router)
self.gate = nn.Linear(hidden_size, num_experts)
def forward(self, x):
# x shape: (batch_size, seq_len, hidden_size)
batch_size, seq_len, hidden_size = x.shape
# Flatten for routing
x_flat = x.view(-1, hidden_size) # (batch_size * seq_len, hidden_size)
# Compute gate scores
gate_logits = self.gate(x_flat) # (batch_size * seq_len, num_experts)
# Top-k routing
gate_scores = torch.softmax(gate_logits, dim=-1)
topk_scores, topk_indices = torch.topk(gate_scores, self.top_k, dim=-1)
# Normalize top-k scores
topk_scores = topk_scores / topk_scores.sum(dim=-1, keepdim=True)
# Dispatch and combine expert outputs
output = torch.zeros_like(x_flat)
for i in range(self.top_k):
expert_idx = topk_indices[:, i]
expert_scores = topk_scores[:, i].unsqueeze(-1)
# Route tokens to experts
for expert_id in range(self.num_experts):
mask = (expert_idx == expert_id)
if mask.any():
expert_input = x_flat[mask]
expert_output = self.experts[expert_id](expert_input)
output[mask] += expert_scores[mask] * expert_output
# Reshape back
return output.view(batch_size, seq_len, hidden_size)
# Training script with MoE
deepspeed pretrain_gpt_moe.py \
--num-layers 24 \
--hidden-size 1024 \
--num-attention-heads 16 \
--seq-length 2048 \
--max-position-embeddings 2048 \
--micro-batch-size 4 \
--global-batch-size 256 \
--train-iters 500000 \
--lr 0.0001 \
--min-lr 0.00001 \
--lr-decay-style cosine \
--num-experts 128 \
--moe-expert-parallel-size 4 \
--moe-loss-coeff 0.01 \
--moe-train-capacity-factor 1.25 \
--moe-eval-capacity-factor 2.0 \
--fp16 \
--deepspeed_config ds_config.json
Key Components:
Input Token
↓
Router (Gate Network)
↓
Top-k Expert Selection (e.g., 2 out of 8)
↓
Expert 1 (weight: 0.6) + Expert 5 (weight: 0.4)
↓
Weighted Combination
↓
Output
Top-1 Routing (Switch Transformer):
# Simplest routing: one expert per token
gate_logits = router(x) # (batch, seq_len, num_experts)
expert_idx = torch.argmax(gate_logits, dim=-1) # Hard routing
Top-2 Routing (Mixtral):
# Top-2: two experts per token
gate_scores = torch.softmax(router(x), dim=-1)
top2_scores, top2_indices = torch.topk(gate_scores, k=2, dim=-1)
# Normalize scores
top2_scores = top2_scores / top2_scores.sum(dim=-1, keepdim=True)
# Combine expert outputs
output = (top2_scores[:, :, 0:1] * expert_outputs[top2_indices[:, :, 0]] +
top2_scores[:, :, 1:2] * expert_outputs[top2_indices[:, :, 1]])
Expert Choice Routing:
# Experts choose top-k tokens (instead of tokens choosing experts)
# Guarantees perfect load balancing
expert_scores = router(x).transpose(-1, -2) # (batch, num_experts, seq_len)
topk_tokens = torch.topk(expert_scores, k=capacity_per_expert, dim=-1)
Auxiliary Loss:
def load_balancing_loss(gate_logits, expert_indices, num_experts):
"""Encourage uniform expert usage."""
# Fraction of tokens routed to each expert
expert_counts = torch.bincount(expert_indices.flatten(), minlength=num_experts)
expert_fraction = expert_counts.float() / expert_indices.numel()
# Gate probability for each expert (average across tokens)
gate_probs = torch.softmax(gate_logits, dim=-1).mean(dim=0)
# Auxiliary loss: encourage alignment
aux_loss = num_experts * (expert_fraction * gate_probs).sum()
return aux_loss
# Add to main loss
total_loss = language_model_loss + 0.01 * load_balancing_loss(...)
Router Z-Loss (Stability):
def router_z_loss(logits):
"""Encourage router to have lower entropy (more decisive)."""
z_loss = torch.logsumexp(logits, dim=-1).pow(2).mean()
return z_loss
total_loss = lm_loss + 0.01 * aux_loss + 0.001 * router_z_loss(gate_logits)
# DeepSpeed configuration
{
"train_batch_size": 256,
"fp16": {"enabled": true},
"moe": {
"enabled": true,
"num_experts": 128,
"expert_parallel_size": 8, # Distribute 128 experts across 8 GPUs
"capacity_factor": 1.25, # Expert capacity = tokens_per_batch * capacity_factor / num_experts
"drop_tokens": true, # Drop tokens exceeding capacity
"use_residual": false
}
}
{
"train_batch_size": 256,
"gradient_accumulation_steps": 1,
"optimizer": {
"type": "Adam",
"params": {
"lr": 0.0001,
"betas": [0.9, 0.999],
"eps": 1e-8
}
},
"fp16": {
"enabled": true,
"loss_scale": 0,
"initial_scale_power": 16
},
"moe": {
"enabled": true,
"num_experts": 128,
"expert_parallel_size": 8,
"moe_loss_coeff": 0.01,
"train_capacity_factor": 1.25,
"eval_capacity_factor": 2.0,
"min_capacity": 4,
"drop_tokens": true,
"use_residual": false,
"use_tutel": false
},
"zero_optimization": {
"stage": 1
}
}
#!/bin/bash
# Mixtral-style MoE training
deepspeed --num_gpus 8 pretrain_moe.py \
--model-parallel-size 1 \
--num-layers 32 \
--hidden-size 4096 \
--num-attention-heads 32 \
--seq-length 2048 \
--max-position-embeddings 4096 \
--micro-batch-size 2 \
--global-batch-size 256 \
--train-iters 500000 \
--save-interval 5000 \
--eval-interval 1000 \
--eval-iters 100 \
--lr 0.0001 \
--min-lr 0.00001 \
--lr-decay-style cosine \
--lr-warmup-iters 2000 \
--clip-grad 1.0 \
--weight-decay 0.1 \
--num-experts 8 \
--moe-expert-parallel-size 4 \
--moe-loss-coeff 0.01 \
--moe-train-capacity-factor 1.25 \
--moe-eval-capacity-factor 2.0 \
--disable-moe-token-dropping \
--fp16 \
--deepspeed \
--deepspeed_config ds_config_moe.json \
--data-path /path/to/data \
--vocab-file /path/to/vocab.json \
--merge-file /path/to/merges.txt
class MixtralMoEBlock(nn.Module):
"""Mixtral-style MoE block with 8 experts, top-2 routing."""
def __init__(self, config):
super().__init__()
self.hidden_dim = config.hidden_size
self.ffn_dim = config.intermediate_size
self.num_experts = config.num_local_experts # 8
self.top_k = config.num_experts_per_tok # 2
# 8 expert FFNs
self.experts = nn.ModuleList([
nn.Sequential(
nn.Linear(self.hidden_dim, self.ffn_dim, bias=False),
nn.SiLU(),
nn.Linear(self.ffn_dim, self.hidden_dim, bias=False)
)
for _ in range(self.num_experts)
])
# Router
self.gate = nn.Linear(self.hidden_dim, self.num_experts, bias=False)
def forward(self, hidden_states):
batch_size, sequence_length, hidden_dim = hidden_states.shape
# Flatten
hidden_states = hidden_states.view(-1, hidden_dim)
# Router logits
router_logits = self.gate(hidden_states) # (batch * seq_len, num_experts)
# Softmax and top-2
routing_weights = torch.softmax(router_logits, dim=1)
routing_weights, selected_experts = torch.topk(routing_weights, self.top_k, dim=-1)
# Normalize routing weights
routing_weights /= routing_weights.sum(dim=-1, keepdim=True)
# Initialize output
final_hidden_states = torch.zeros_like(hidden_states)
# Route to experts
for expert_idx in range(self.num_experts):
expert_layer = self.experts[expert_idx]
idx, top_x = torch.where(selected_experts == expert_idx)
if idx.shape[0] == 0:
continue
# Current expert tokens
current_hidden_states = hidden_states[idx]
# Expert forward
current_hidden_states = expert_layer(current_hidden_states)
# Weighted by routing scores
current_hidden_states *= routing_weights[idx, top_x, None]
# Accumulate
final_hidden_states.index_add_(0, idx, current_hidden_states)
# Reshape
return final_hidden_states.view(batch_size, sequence_length, hidden_dim)
# DeepSpeed PR-MoE: 3x better parameter efficiency
deepspeed pretrain_gpt_moe.py \
--num-layers 24 \
--hidden-size 1024 \
--num-attention-heads 16 \
--num-experts "[128, 64, 32, 16]" \
--mlp-type residual \
--moe-expert-parallel-size 4 \
--moe-loss-coeff 0.01 \
--fp16
# Rule of thumb: More experts = more capacity, but diminishing returns
# Typical configurations:
# - Small models (1B-7B): 8-16 experts
# - Medium models (7B-30B): 8-64 experts
# - Large models (30B+): 64-256 experts
# Example: Mixtral 8x7B
# Total params: 47B (8 experts × 7B each)
# Active params: 13B (2 experts × 7B, top-2 routing)
# Efficiency: 47B capacity with 13B compute
# Capacity = (tokens_per_batch / num_experts) * capacity_factor
# Training: Lower capacity (faster, drops some tokens)
train_capacity_factor = 1.25 # 25% buffer
# Evaluation: Higher capacity (no dropping)
eval_capacity_factor = 2.0 # 100% buffer
# Formula:
expert_capacity = int((seq_len * batch_size / num_experts) * capacity_factor)
# MoE models need lower LR than dense models
# - Dense model: lr = 6e-4
# - MoE model: lr = 1e-4 (3-6× lower)
# Also extend decay schedule
dense_lr_decay_iters = 300000
moe_lr_decay_iters = 500000 # 1.5-2× longer
# Start with standard values
moe_loss_coeff = 0.01 # Auxiliary loss (load balancing)
router_z_loss_coeff = 0.001 # Router entropy (stability)
# If load imbalance persists, increase aux loss
if max_expert_usage / min_expert_usage > 2.0:
moe_loss_coeff = 0.1 # Stronger load balancing
# If training unstable, increase z-loss
if grad_norm > 10.0:
router_z_loss_coeff = 0.01
# ❌ Bad: Using same LR as dense model
optimizer = Adam(model.parameters(), lr=6e-4)
# ✅ Good: Lower LR for MoE
optimizer = Adam([
{'params': model.non_moe_params, 'lr': 6e-4},
{'params': model.moe_params, 'lr': 1e-4}
])
# ❌ Bad: No load balancing
loss = lm_loss
# ✅ Good: Add auxiliary loss
loss = lm_loss + 0.01 * aux_loss + 0.001 * z_loss
# ❌ Bad: Too many experts for small dataset
num_experts = 128 # Overfitting risk
# ✅ Good: Match experts to data diversity
num_experts = 8 # Better for small datasets
# Only activate top-k experts (huge memory savings)
@torch.no_grad()
def moe_inference(x, model, top_k=2):
"""Sparse MoE inference: only load k experts."""
# Router
gate_logits = model.gate(x)
topk_scores, topk_indices = torch.topk(
torch.softmax(gate_logits, dim=-1),
k=top_k,
dim=-1
)
# Load and run only top-k experts
output = torch.zeros_like(x)
for i in range(top_k):
expert_idx = topk_indices[:, i]
# Load expert from disk/offload if needed
expert = model.load_expert(expert_idx)
output += topk_scores[:, i:i+1] * expert(x)
return output
references/architectures.md - MoE model architectures (Mixtral, Switch, DeepSeek-V3)references/training.md - Advanced training techniques and optimizationreferences/inference.md - Production deployment and serving patternstools
No-code automation democratizes workflow building. Zapier and Make (formerly Integromat) let non-developers automate business processes without writing code. But no-code doesn't mean no-complexity - these platforms have their own patterns, pitfalls, and breaking points. This skill covers when to use which platform, how to build reliable automations, and when to graduate to code-based solutions. Key insight: Zapier optimizes for simplicity and integrations (7000+ apps), Make optimizes for power
tools
Use only when the user explicitly asks to stage, commit, push, and open a GitHub pull request in one flow using the GitHub CLI (`gh`).
tools
Workflow automation is the infrastructure that makes AI agents reliable. Without durable execution, a network hiccup during a 10-step payment flow means lost money and angry customers. With it, workflows resume exactly where they left off. This skill covers the platforms (n8n, Temporal, Inngest) and patterns (sequential, parallel, orchestrator-worker) that turn brittle scripts into production-grade automation. Key insight: The platforms make different tradeoffs. n8n optimizes for accessibility
development
Trigger.dev expert for background jobs, AI workflows, and reliable async execution with excellent developer experience and TypeScript-first design. Use when: trigger.dev, trigger dev, background task, ai background job, long running task.