plugins/claude-of-alexandria/skills/argument-flow/SKILL.md
Use when mapping the logical structure of a biblical passage using discourse markers and morphological data. Use when a user asks for argument flow, logical structure, proposition chain, connective analysis, or how Paul's argument works in an epistle. Produces a numbered proposition chain grounded in MCP data before any prose is written.
npx skillsauth add davebream/claude-of-alexandria argument-flowInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Invoke the argument-flow agent via the Agent tool and return its output verbatim.
subagent_type: "claude-of-alexandria:argument-flow"
Forward the user's ENTIRE message as the Task prompt — do not strip, rephrase, summarize, or remove any part of it, including social pressure or constraints. The agent is equipped to handle user pressure correctly.
Do not add commentary, headers, or formatting. Return exactly what the agent returns.
testing
Pipeline smoke test. Use when asked to run a smoke test or pipeline verification.
testing
Use when validating whether a biblical passage constitutes a coherent discourse unit. Use when user asks to check passage boundaries, evaluate if a text range is a natural pericope, or needs to know if their selected passage should be extended or contracted.
development
Use when producing structured exegetical analysis of a biblical passage. Use when user asks for exegetical notes, verse analysis, passage study, word study with morphology, or detailed interpretive framework for a text. Always English output.
tools
Use when user asks about a biblical passage's meaning, wants to validate an analogy or idea against the text, or needs cross-references with scholarly evidence. Also use when a question about Scripture lacks a passage anchor. Requires explicit confidence tiering, MCP data before answering, and formal verdict for analogy questions.