skills/prose-architect/SKILL.md
Architect PROSE-compliant agent primitives for AI-native development. Use when (1) Building AI-native apps from requirements ("I want an app that...") (2) Making legacy projects AI-native (3) Designing agent workflows (4) Auditing existing primitives for reliability issues. PROSE = Progressive Disclosure, Reduced Scope, Orchestrated Composition, Safety Boundaries, Explicit Hierarchy
npx skillsauth add danielmeppiel/awesome-ai-native prose-architectInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Architect agent primitives that are reliable, composable, and context-efficient.
First, determine your mode:
| Trigger | Mode | Action | |---------|------|--------| | "I want an AI-native app that..." | Greenfield | Design primitives from requirements | | "Make this project AI-native" | Brownfield | Analyze → recommend → generate | | "Review/audit this agent/prompt" | Audit | Check PROSE compliance |
Goal: Design primitives from natural language requirements.
| Task Description | Recommended Pattern | |------------------|---------------------| | Single focused task | Pattern 1: Single Agent | | Multiple workflows, one domain | Pattern 2: Agent + Prompts | | Cross-domain, role separation | Pattern 3: Multi-Agent + Handoffs | | Large project, many domains | Pattern 4: Full Primitive Stack | | Reusable cross-project capability | Pattern 5: Skill |
Goal: Make existing project AI-native.
Before deep analysis, self-assess:
explore subagentsRule: Load file trees, not file contents. Get summaries from subagents.
Goal: Check existing primitives for PROSE compliance.
| Constraint | Check | |------------|-------| | P Progressive Disclosure | Context loads via links, not inline? | | R Reduced Scope | One concern per primitive? Fresh context per phase? | | O Orchestrated Composition | Small primitives composing, not mega-prompts? | | S Safety Boundaries | Tools, knowledge, approval gates explicit? | | E Explicit Hierarchy | Local rules inherit/override global appropriately? |
| Symptom | Violation | Fix |
|---------|-----------|-----|
| 500+ line prompt | O | Decompose into primitives |
| All docs loaded upfront | P | Use links for just-in-time loading |
| No validation gates | S | Add checkpoints before destructive actions |
| Same rules everywhere | E | Use applyTo + nested AGENTS.md |
| "Do everything" agent | R | Split into phases or multiple agents |
.agent.md, .instructions.md, .prompt.md, SKILL.md, AGENTS.md, .context.mddevelopment
Maintainer-only workflow for handling GitHub Secret Scanning alerts on OpenClaw. Use when Codex needs to triage, redact, clean up, and resolve secret leakage found in issue comments, issue bodies, PR comments, or other GitHub content.
development
Maintainer workflow for OpenClaw releases, prereleases, changelog release notes, and publish validation. Use when Codex needs to prepare or verify stable or beta release steps, align version naming, assemble release notes, check release auth requirements, or validate publish-time commands and artifacts.
development
Run, watch, debug, and extend OpenClaw QA testing with qa-lab and qa-channel. Use when Codex needs to execute the repo-backed QA suite, inspect live QA artifacts, debug failing scenarios, add new QA scenarios, or explain the OpenClaw QA workflow. Prefer the live OpenAI lane with regular openai/gpt-5.4 in fast mode; do not use gpt-5.4-pro or gpt-5.4-mini unless the user explicitly overrides that policy.
development
End-to-end Parallels smoke, upgrade, and rerun workflow for OpenClaw across macOS, Windows, and Linux guests. Use when Codex needs to run, rerun, debug, or interpret VM-based install, onboarding, gateway smoke tests, latest-release-to-main upgrade checks, fresh snapshot retests, or optional Discord roundtrip verification under Parallels.