codyswanngt/lisa-setup-automations

Set up Lisa automations: $ARGUMENTS

This skill is a specification, not a script. It tells the current runtime which recurring Lisa automations to create, on what cadence, and with which parameters — and the runtime creates them with its native scheduling mechanism. Do not hand-template schedule files or write shell to create them; invoke the runtime's automation tool with the spec below.

Runtime scheduler (branch on the current runtime)

• Codex → create Codex automations via the native automations mechanism (prefer the automation_update tool over hand-writing ~/.codex/automations/<id>/automation.toml; the TOML is only its backing store). Set the execution environment to local so they run on this workstation. Scope them to a durable project automation checkout, not a transient task worktree: use ${CODEX_HOME:-~/.codex}/worktrees/<project>-automation-main when available, create or refresh that checkout from the project's origin remote if needed, and verify git -C <cwd> rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree --is-bare-repository reports true then false before saving the automation. Do not point recurring automations at hashed scratch worktrees or a checkout whose Git metadata is broken.
• Claude → use /schedule to create local recurring routines, one per automation below.
• Other runtimes → use the runtime's native recurring-task mechanism. If the runtime has none, state that scheduling is unavailable and stop.

Parameters

• auto-start-prds (default true) — passed as prd_ready to the exploratory-prds automation. true → ideated PRDs are created prd-ready (auto-picked-up by PRD intake); false → created as drafts for human review. When true, /lisa:project-ideation still checks the configured PRD queue before writing: existing prd-ready, prd-in-review, prd-blocked, unresolved prd-ticketed, or unresolved source-reader pressure can intentionally turn the automation cycle into a blocked/idle outcome instead of creating another ready PRD.

• auto-start-tickets (default true) — passed as ready to the exploratory-bugs automation. true → filed bug/usability tickets are created build-ready (auto-picked-up by ticket intake); false → created in the backlog for human triage.

• learnings-audit (default false) — opt-in: when true, additionally create the weekly lisa-auto-<project>-learnings-audit automation running /lisa:learnings:audit (the gardener — see "Optional automation" below). Default false because the gardener's output is human-gated tracker tickets: a project opts into the recurring audit stream deliberately rather than receiving recommendation tickets by surprise.

The defaults are autonomous by design — the factory model wants inputs flowing through the gates without a human between the loops and the pipeline. Pass false explicitly to opt a project into human triage. The two auto-start flags affect only the two exploratory automations; the intake gates' adversarial validation remains the quality control either way.

Repository-readiness advisory

Before creating or updating registrations, locate the standing repository-readiness report through RRR-3's canonical resolveReadinessReportPath contract (currently .lisa/readiness.json under the resolved project root). This consumes the shared report; it never creates a second readiness assessment. Read the report exactly once. Do not re-run lisa doctor --readiness, because doing so would execute journeys and replace the standing evidence the operator is about to act on.

A report is usable for this advisory only when all of these are true:

• the file parses to a JSON object whose schema_version is 1 and whose verdict is NOT_READY;
• blocker_count is a positive integer and the blockers array length exactly equals blocker_count;
• each blocker has a unique id in the closed set B1 through B7 (duplicate blocker ids make the report internally inconsistent, and uniqueness caps the count at seven) and a non-empty operator-facing label; and
• narrowed_claim is a non-empty string.

For one usable report, emit exactly one warning naming the blocker count, each blocker's id and label, and the narrowed claim. For example: "Repository readiness warning — 3 standing ship blockers: B2 Release path bypasses validation; B4 Failing loop has no recovery; B7 Operability cannot be proved. Narrowed claim: ready for supervised changes only." This is a warning only: setup continues, and no registration or runbook step is skipped because blockers stand.

Treat a missing or unreadable file, invalid JSON, unsupported schema, or internally inconsistent report as unavailable: emit no readiness warning and no error, then continue setup normally. Do not invent an artifact freshness, age, or TTL rule; the persisted contract defines no such field. This advisory is never a precondition and follows the same never-block-always-degrade posture as runbook scaffolding below.

The readiness rule pair reaches each supported runtime through its native delivery path. Claude and Copilot carry the shared Markdown rule tree and inject its eager tier; Cursor receives transformed .mdc rules. Codex mirrors the shared parent rules into .codex/lisa-rules and injects the eager tier at session start. OpenCode mirrors the same tree into .opencode/lisa-rules, loads the eager tier through opencode.json instructions, and leaves the reference tier available on demand. Antigravity is the explicit representation gap: its artifact has no rules tree or eager-rule injection. It still receives this setup skill and its warning contract; the missing standalone rule surface is an accepted limitation, not a silent drop.

The automations to create

Each automation runs one cycle of a Lisa command and respects that command's confirmation policy (never ask before running; exit cleanly when the queue is idle; report the cycle summary). Before running the Lisa command, each automation must attempt to sync its checkout. Fetch the default remote branch, then rebase onto origin/main or the resolved default branch. If the checkout is already on the default branch, fast-forward/rebase it to the remote default. A dirty working tree is not by itself a blocker: capture git status --short --branch, leave pre-existing changes untouched, and continue when the sync and selected Lisa command can run without overwriting those paths. Abort only when Git reports an actual sync conflict or the selected command would need to modify an already-dirty path; in that case leave queue state unchanged and report the exact conflicting path(s).

| Automation | Command it runs | Cadence | |---|---|---| | intake-repair | /lisa:repair-intake <resolved repair queue> (GitHub self-host example: acme/frontend intake_mode=both build_queue=acme/planning) | every 60 minutes | | intake-prd | /lisa:intake <PRD queue> (e.g. acme/frontend intake_mode=prd) | every 60 minutes | | intake-tickets | /lisa:intake <build queue> (e.g. acme/planning intake_mode=build) | every 10 minutes | | exploratory-bugs | /lisa-<stack>:exploratory-qa ready=<auto-start-tickets> | once a day | | exploratory-prds | /lisa:project-ideation prd_ready=<auto-start-prds> | once a day | | monitor | /lisa:monitor | once a day |

For a Codex rrule: every 60 min → FREQ=HOURLY;INTERVAL=1; every 10 min → FREQ=MINUTELY;INTERVAL=10; once a day → FREQ=DAILY;INTERVAL=1; once a week → FREQ=WEEKLY;INTERVAL=1.

Optional automation — the gardener. When the operator opts in (learnings-audit=true; default false — this one is opt-in, unlike the six defaults above), additionally create lisa-auto-<project>-learnings-audit running /lisa:learnings:audit once a week. It audits the project's knowledge surfaces (learnings ledger, rules trees, skills, wiki) and files human-gated promote/demote/confirm/retire tickets per the lisa-learnings-audit skill. Register at most ONE learnings-audit automation per project — the gardener's marker dedupe assumes a single scheduled runner and guarantees convergence (a transient duplicate from a concurrent run is closed by the next run's dedupe or the human), not mutual exclusion; manual runs should first confirm the cron is not due or running. Tear-down removes it with the rest of the lisa-auto-<project>-* set.

Exploratory PRD pressure gate. auto-start-prds=true means "create PRDs in the ready PRD lifecycle when the PRD queue has capacity," not "always create a new ready PRD." The exploratory-prds automation uses the same PRD source queue and pressure roles reported by /lisa:queue-status; if pressure exists, the cycle should report the blocking role/ref and the smallest next action, usually /lisa:intake <PRD queue>, without invoking research or writing a PRD.

Queue resolution. Resolve the intake/repair queue from merged config — source for the PRD queue, tracker for the build queue. For GitHub, the PRD command uses canonical identity github.org/github.repo; the build command resolves github.queueRepo and falls back to that identity. Keep automation naming tied to the identity repo. Bake every resolved owner/repo into the scheduled commands (for example /lisa:intake acme/frontend intake_mode=prd, /lisa:intake acme/planning intake_mode=build, and /lisa:repair-intake acme/frontend intake_mode=both build_queue=acme/planning) so a later config/read-context failure cannot silently redirect the cron. A short queueRepo is normalized to github.org before writing the automation.

Registration prompt shape (so status can read the command back). Whatever prose the prompt carries, it must contain the literal Lisa command on a line of its own, exactly as scheduled and with every owner/repo already baked in:

/lisa:intake acme/planning intake_mode=build

This holds for loops that take no arguments too — /lisa:monitor and /lisa:learnings:audit are written the same way, on their own line, with nothing after them. /lisa:automation-status reads that line back to compare the live registration against this contract; a loop whose command cannot be read back reports as drifted even though it is registered correctly.

Naming + scope (so teardown is precise). Name each automation with the stable prefix lisa-auto-<project>- (e.g. lisa-auto-<project>-intake-tickets), where <project> identifies this repo, and scope each Codex automation to the durable project automation checkout described above. This lets /tear-down-automations find and remove exactly this set and never touch other projects' automations or non-Lisa ones. Use a project identifier stable across runs and distinct from other repos (don't rely on a bare repo basename when it could collide; qualify it, e.g. with the owner).

Idempotent. Re-running this skill updates the existing lisa-auto-<project>-* automations in place (same names) rather than creating duplicates.

Runbook scaffolding

Registration is what pulls a loop under the automation-runbook-contract rule, so registration is what must produce its runbook. For every automation actually registered above — including the conditionally-guarded exploratory-bugs and the opt-in learnings-audit — write a checked-in runbook at:

.lisa/automations/<loop-id>.runbook.md

<loop-id> is the automation's suffix, not its full name: intake-tickets, not lisa-auto-<project>-intake-tickets. These files are project knowledge and belong in git, like .lisa/PROJECT_LEARNINGS.md — commit them; they are not scratch output. Derive the set of runbooks from what was registered on this run: a loop that was skipped gets no runbook, and a loop registered later gets one when this skill next runs. Never write a runbook from a fixed list of loop names.

Follow the automation-runbook-contract rule for the runbook's shape: its ten sections, in its order, in its prose register. Do not restate the template, the run outcomes, or the escalation packet here — cite the rule and instantiate it.

File shape — two halves with different owners.

1. A machine-resolved header block, delimited exactly by <!-- lisa:machine-resolved:start --> and <!-- lisa:machine-resolved:end -->, written first in the file. Lisa owns it: on every run it is rewritten wholesale from the values resolved above. It carries the project identity (<owner>/<repo> and the <project> token), the loop id, the full automation name, the exact scheduled command with every owner/repo already baked in (never a placeholder), the human cadence and its rrule, the resolved queue arguments, and the resolved flag values that shaped the command (auto-start-prds / auto-start-tickets / learnings-audit). Its first line inside the delimiters is a visible sentence, so the ownership boundary survives rendering to markdown where HTML comments disappear:

   Lisa rewrites this section on every /lisa:setup-automations run — edits here are lost. Your prose
   belongs in the sections below.
   

   Immediately below the closing delimiter, write one more visible line — Everything below is yours. — so an operator reading the rendered page knows where their half starts.

2. The ten contract sections below it. Lisa owns them only on first write, then they belong to the operator. Seed them deterministically, never improvised:

   • Intent, Sources of truth, Candidate selection, Scope/bounds, Retirement condition come from the per-loop seed table below.
   • Proof, Autonomous-vs-approval boundary, Escalation, Recovery, Next-run state are derived from that loop's own SKILL.md — named per loop in the table's last column — so the runbook describes what the loop actually does rather than a generic paraphrase. Quote its behavior in the operator's voice; if the skill file is unreadable, write one sentence saying the section was not derivable and which file to read, and continue.

   Every seeded sentence is written for a non-technical operator (factory-model rule 5).

Per-loop seed defaults

One line each; expand them into the operator's voice, keep the meaning.

| Loop | Intent | Sources of truth | Candidate selection | Scope/bounds | Retirement condition | Derive the other five from | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | intake-repair | Keeps the queues unstuck: work that stalled mid-flight gets diagnosed and moved again. | The PRD and build queues for this project, read through the tracker access layer. | Stuck or half-closed items — stalled in an in-progress role, terminal-labeled but still open, rollups whose children are all done — up to the max_candidates cap. | Only this project's configured queues; it repairs lifecycle state, never invents or closes real work. | Structural to the factory — this loop does not retire. Queues will always need unsticking, so no condition should ever stop it; say that here rather than leaving the section blank. | lisa-repair-intake/SKILL.md | | intake-prd | Keeps PRDs moving: a PRD a human marked ready gets validated and decomposed into work items. | The configured PRD queue and its lifecycle roles, read through the source access layer. | The oldest PRD in the ready role, one per run. | Only this project's PRD queue; it never authors product intent, only validates and decomposes it. | Structural to the factory — this loop does not retire. PRDs keep arriving for as long as the project is alive, so no condition should ever stop it; say that here rather than leaving the section blank. | lisa-intake/SKILL.md | | intake-tickets | Keeps the build queue moving: work items a human marked ready get built, reviewed, and shipped. | The configured tracker's build queue lanes plus each item's comments and linked PRs. | The oldest eligible leaf work item in the ready lane, one per run. | Only this repo's configured queue; containers with open children are repaired out, never built. | Structural to the factory — this loop does not retire. The build queue is how work ships, so no condition should ever stop it; say that here rather than leaving the section blank. | lisa-intake/SKILL.md | | monitor | Keeps production honest: observability regressions become tracked work instead of silent decay. | The connected observability providers, each through its access layer, plus this project's monitor.gapTiers config. | The regressions and coverage gaps this cycle surfaced, capped per run. | Only this project's own services and dashboards; it files findings, it never changes production. | Propose teardown when ALL THREE hold: a date-filtered tracker search finds nothing this loop filed within the trailing 30-day window (a small multiple of its daily cadence), AND this run found nothing, AND the project has no connected observability surfaces left — nothing to monitor. The third is a domain conjunct that only tightens the contract's two-part test: a quiet month on a healthy project is good news, not a reason to stop watching it. | lisa-monitor/SKILL.md | | exploratory-prds | Keeps the idea pipeline fed: the product's own gaps become PRDs when the PRD queue has room. | The PRD queue's pressure roles (the same ones /lisa:queue-status reports) and the project's own product surfaces. | One ideated PRD per run, and only when the pressure gate says the queue has capacity. | Never more than one PRD per run, and nothing at all while unresolved PRD pressure exists. | Propose teardown when ALL THREE hold: a date-filtered tracker search finds no PRD this loop ideated within the trailing 30-day window (a small multiple of its daily cadence), AND this run proposed nothing, AND no unresolved PRD pressure exists while the project has shipped no new surface to ideate against. The third is a domain conjunct that only tightens the contract's two-part test: a quiet month because the queue was full is the loop working, not the loop being obsolete. | lisa-project-ideation/SKILL.md | | exploratory-bugs | Keeps quality visible: bugs and usability problems get found by using the product, before a customer does. | The running application through its exploratory-qa surface, plus this project's existing bug queue for dedupe. | The findings of one exploratory session, capped per run and deduped against already-filed items. | Only this project's own app; it files tickets, it never changes product code. | Propose teardown when ALL THREE hold: a date-filtered tracker search finds no finding this loop filed within the trailing 30-day window (a small multiple of its daily cadence), AND this run found nothing, AND the project no longer ships an exploratory-qa command surface to explore. The third is a domain conjunct that only tightens the contract's two-part test: a quiet month on a product nobody broke is quality holding, not a reason to stop looking. | lisa-exploratory-qa/SKILL.md (the stack's own copy) | | learnings-audit | Keeps the project's knowledge true: stale, duplicated, or contradicted knowledge gets proposed for promotion, demotion, or retirement. | The learnings ledger, the rules trees, the skills, and the wiki — the project's knowledge surfaces. | The knowledge entries this audit judged stale, duplicated, or contradicted, capped per run. | It only proposes; every promote/demote/retire decision is a human-gated tracker ticket. | Propose teardown when BOTH hold: a date-filtered tracker search finds no [lisa-gardener] ticket created within the trailing six-week window (six runs at the weekly cadence), AND this run proposed nothing. | lisa-learnings-audit/SKILL.md |

Retirement condition is mandatory and non-empty. Every seeded runbook states one, and a loop that is structurally permanent says exactly that instead of leaving the section blank — an operator reading it aloud must be able to say when this loop should stop existing, or that it never should. A valid condition is stateless: derived from the tracker, or from the loop's own bounded run history at .lisa/automations/runs/<loop-id>.jsonl — written by the contract's own recorder, not private per-loop state — and never an ad-hoc counter or a new state file. Those two sources are the same discipline, not a loosening of the contract's "never from a counter or a state file": the run history is written and bounded by automation-run-record.mjs, is readable by any run on any machine, and is never invented per loop. What the contract forbids is a loop minting private state to remember itself by. Prefer the tracker; reach for the run history only when the tracker cannot answer the question. The mechanism itself — the two-part test, the single marker-deduped teardown proposal, and the three operator responses — is defined once in the automation-runbook-contract rule; these seeds only fill in each loop's specifics. A seed may add a domain conjunct on top of the contract's two-part test — an extra AND that must also hold — because an additional conjunct is strictly tighter and never divergent. It may never drop or weaken either of the contract's two conditions. Silence alone means obsolescence only for the gardener; for a monitoring or exploratory loop a quiet month usually means the project is healthy, which is exactly why those seeds carry a third conjunct.

A loop not in this table — one registered later — seeds all ten sections from its own SKILL.md the same way. The table is seed prose for first write only; it is not a roster and never decides which automations exist.

Re-run rule (idempotent, never clobber). When the file already exists: rewrite the machine-resolved block in place and leave every one of the ten sections exactly as found — an operator's edited Intent paragraph survives verbatim. If a contract section is missing from an existing file, insert it at its position in the contract's ten-section order (never merely appended at the end, which would leave the file permanently out of order) with its seeded default. Never overwrite, reorder, reword, or delete prose already on disk. If the machine-resolved delimiters are absent (a hand-written file), insert the block at the top and touch nothing else.

Never a precondition. A runbook that cannot be written is a degradation, not a blocker: report the failure and continue registering automations. A loop with a missing runbook still runs — on the contract's defaults, saying so in its one-line summary — per the contract's never-block-always-degrade rule. Scaffolding failure never aborts setup and never leaves an automation unregistered.

Conditions / guards

• exploratory-bugs is created only when the project ships an exploratory-qa command (the expo / rails / harper-fabric stacks). If the project has no lisa-exploratory-qa skill/command, skip that automation and note it — do not invent a command that doesn't exist.
• monitor is created unconditionally: /lisa:monitor resolves the connected observability providers itself and reports gaps (per its monitor.gapTiers config) rather than failing when a provider is absent, so an unconnected project gets gap findings instead of a broken automation. Its findings become tracker tickets, feeding the pipeline at the build gate like every other input.
• If the runtime has no native scheduler, or the intake queues can't be resolved from config, stop and report what's missing rather than guessing.
• For Codex, if the durable checkout cannot be created, fetched, or verified as a non-bare Git work tree, stop and report the checkout problem instead of creating automations that will fail later.

Report

List each automation created or updated (name, the command it runs, cadence, and the resolved auto-start-prds / auto-start-tickets values), plus any automation skipped and why.

Then list each runbook written, by path (.lisa/automations/<loop-id>.runbook.md), saying for each whether it was created (seeded fresh) or refreshed (machine-resolved block rewritten, operator prose left untouched). Name every skipped loop again here and state plainly that it has no runbook because it was not registered, and why — for example, "exploratory-bugs was skipped because this project ships no exploratory-qa command, so no runbook was written for it."

Close with the two lines that tell the operator what to do next:

• When any runbook was newly created: "N new files were written under .lisa/automations/ — commit them so the whole team sees them."
• When a runbook could not be written: name which one and what failed, then the consequence and the fix — "that loop runs on defaults and its summaries will lead with 'Runbook missing' — re-run /lisa:setup-automations to fix." The automation itself is still registered and still runs.

Every line states the consequence and the action, in words a non-technical operator can act on without reading code.