plugins/lisa-agy/skills/linear-evidence/SKILL.md
Uploads text evidence to the GitHub `pr-assets` release, updates the PR description, posts a comment on the originating Linear Issue with code blocks, and transitions the Issue from the configured `claimed` label to the configured `review` label. Reusable by any skill that captures evidence and generates evidence/comment.txt + evidence/code-blocks.md. Linear counterpart of lisa:jira-evidence and lisa:github-evidence.
npx skillsauth add codyswanngt/lisa linear-evidenceInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Post verification evidence to a Linear Issue and transition it from the configured claimed build label to the configured review build label. This skill is the destination of the lisa:tracker-evidence shim when tracker = "linear".
$ARGUMENTS is the Linear Issue identifier (e.g. ENG-123) and the path to the evidence directory. Caller passes both: <IDENTIFIER> <evidence-dir>.
The claimed and review build labels are read from .lisa.config.json linear.labels.build.*, falling back to the defaults documented in the config-resolution rule (status:in-progress and status:code-review).
read_role() {
local role="$1" default="$2"
local local_v global_v
local_v=$(jq -r ".linear.labels.build.${role} // empty" .lisa.config.local.json 2>/dev/null)
global_v=$(jq -r ".linear.labels.build.${role} // empty" .lisa.config.json 2>/dev/null)
echo "${local_v:-${global_v:-$default}}"
}
CLAIMED=$(read_role claimed "status:in-progress")
REVIEW=$(read_role review "status:code-review")
Reads linear.workspace, linear.teamKey, and linear.labels.build.* from .lisa.config.json (with .local override).
<evidence-dir>)The caller must produce:
evidence/comment.txt — the human-readable comment body posted on the Linear Issue.evidence/code-blocks.md — fenced code blocks (test outputs, command output, log excerpts) appended to the comment.evidence/files/ (optional) — any text files that should be uploaded to the GitHub pr-assets release for permalink-style references.If any of these are missing, stop and report.
$ARGUMENTS.lisa:linear-access operation: get-issue to confirm it exists and capture its current state, label set, and Project membership.If evidence/files/ is non-empty, upload each text file to the GitHub pr-assets release on the current repo via gh release upload. The release is the permalink store — keeps the Linear comment lightweight while preserving large outputs.
For each uploaded file, capture the public release URL.
If a PR is open on the current branch (gh pr view --json url,number,body 2>/dev/null), append an "Evidence" section to its description with:
https://linear.app/<workspace>/issue/<IDENTIFIER>).evidence/comment.txt).If no PR is open, skip this phase.
Call lisa:linear-access operation: save-comment({issueId: <id>, body: <body>}) where <body> is:
[<comment.txt contents verbatim>]
<details>
<summary>Evidence</summary>
[<code-blocks.md contents verbatim>]
</details>
[<bullet list of uploaded evidence file URLs, if any>]
Linear comments support markdown including <details> collapsibles, fenced code, and links — preserve the formatting.
Update labels via lisa:linear-access operation: save-issue to remove $CLAIMED and add $REVIEW. Resolve label IDs first via lisa:linear-access operation: list-issue-labels (create the label via create_issue_label if it doesn't exist on the team).
The native Linear state field is also updated to the team's "In Review" state if one exists — but the label remains the source of truth for cross-team consistency.
Return:
lisa:linear-write-issue.linear.labels.build.* labels; an item that ships without transitioning is invisible to monitoring.lisa:linear-access operation: save-comment fails, retry once. If it fails again, surface the error — don't pretend the comment was posted.development
Prepare a machine — a fresh laptop or a throwaway container — to run coding agents, before any repository exists. Detects which of Lisa's supported agents (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, Antigravity, Copilot) are already installed, asks which credential manager the machine uses (Bitwarden, 1Password, Doppler, Vault, AWS, or none), and installs only what is missing, each by its vendor's own preferred method. Idempotent, headless by default, and emits a Dockerfile for a spin-up/spin-down environment. Run it on a new machine, in a container, or before cloning anything.
tools
Provision and verify a remote execution environment for a host project — Codex Cloud today, other remote surfaces as they are added. Generates a repository-owned setup script that installs the declared toolchain, materializes secrets through lisa-secrets-access, and runs the project's own hook. Provisions by API where one exists, by driving the vendor console where one does not, and by emitting exact config otherwise — then proves the result with the same read-back regardless of which tier did the work. Use before dispatching any work with executionEnv.
tools
Bring a developer's machine in line with the toolchain the project declares. Reports every tool in remoteEnv.tools that is missing, outdated, or unpinned for this platform, and installs the missing ones into ~/.local/bin from the same pinned, checksummed entries the remote surfaces use — but only when asked. Same manifest, same pins, same installers as lisa-setup-remote-env; what differs is consent and that the pin is a floor rather than an equality. Run it on a fresh checkout, after a manifest change, or when a tool fails at the moment of use.
tools
Route one unit of work to a remote execution surface. Reads the executionEnv parameter (local by default, codex-cloud or claude-web today), verifies the environment is provisioned and bound to this repository, submits a thin skill invocation, records the task identifier to .lisa/remote-dispatch.json, and exits without polling. Routing only — the remote runs the identical skill from the identical repository. Composable and inline: other skills invoke it via the Skill tool rather than users calling it directly.