plugins/lisa/skills/github-add-journey/SKILL.md
Add a Validation Journey section to an existing GitHub Issue by analyzing the change type and generating appropriate verification steps with evidence markers. The GitHub counterpart of lisa:jira-add-journey.
npx skillsauth add codyswanngt/lisa github-add-journeyInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Read an existing GitHub Issue, analyze the change type, and append a ## Validation Journey markdown section with appropriate verification steps based on the project's verification patterns.
$ARGUMENTS: <ISSUE_REF>
ISSUE_REF (required): GitHub issue ref — org/repo#<number> or full GitHub issue URL.gh CLI authenticated (gh auth status).gh issue view <number> --repo <org>/<repo> --json number,title,body,labels,assignees,milestone,url
Extract: title, body, type (from type: label), components (from component: labels), assignees, linked PRs.
Parse the body for an existing ## Validation Journey heading. If present and the section contains at least one [EVIDENCE: <name>] marker, the issue already has a journey — report this to the user and stop.
Examine the body, acceptance criteria, and codebase to determine the change type:
Use Explore agents or read the codebase directly to understand which files are affected.
| Change Type | Verification Approach | |---|---| | API/GraphQL | curl commands verifying endpoints, status codes, response schemas | | Database migration | Migration execution + schema verification + rollback check | | Background job/queue | Enqueue + process + state change verification | | Library/utility | Test execution + build verification + export check | | Security fix | Exploit reproduction pre-fix + exploit failure post-fix | | Auth/authz | Multi-role verification with explicit status codes |
Compose the journey with [EVIDENCE: name] markers at key verification points:
## Validation Journey
### Prerequisites
- List required services, database, env vars
### Steps
1. Verify current state before changes
2. Apply the change
3. Verify expected new state [EVIDENCE: state-name]
4. Test error/edge cases [EVIDENCE: error-case]
5. Verify rollback if applicable [EVIDENCE: rollback]
### Assertions
- Describe what must be true after verification
Run \curl -s localhost:3000/health | jq .status`` not "Check the endpoint".api-response, schema-check, rate-limit-hit.Returns 200 with {status: ok} not "API works correctly".[EVIDENCE: name] here is the issue's evidence manifest: validation gate S14 requires at least one, and the issue cannot be closed until each named artifact is captured and attached (see the "Per-Work-Unit Evidence Contract" in the verification rule). Name only evidence you intend to capture — and name all of it.Display the drafted Validation Journey and ask for confirmation before appending it to the issue body. (If invoked from a parent skill running unattended — e.g., lisa:github-write-issue Phase 6 step 5 — proceed without the prompt.)
After approval:
current_body=$(gh issue view <number> --repo <org>/<repo> --json body --jq '.body')
# Compose new body: existing + "\n\n## Validation Journey\n..." (or replace if present)
gh issue edit <number> --repo <org>/<repo> --body-file /tmp/updated-body.md
Preserve every other section verbatim — never re-render the body from parsed fields, since the issue may carry extra_sections we don't recognize.
Re-read the issue and confirm the ## Validation Journey section is present and includes at least one [EVIDENCE: <name>] marker.
lisa:github-create guidelines.documentation
Onboard a user to the project via its LLM Wiki. Interviews the user about themselves in relation to the project, captures that to project-scoped memory only, then gives a guided tour of what the project is and sample questions they can ask. Use when someone is new to the project or asks to be onboarded. Read-mostly — it does not open PRs or write PII into the wiki.
documentation
Migrate an existing, hand-rolled wiki implementation onto the lisa-wiki kernel — phased and compatibility-first, with a strict no-loss guarantee. Use when adopting lisa-wiki in a repo that already has its own wiki/, ingest skills, docs, or roles. Renaming things into the canonical shape is fine; losing functionality or data is not. Ends by running /doctor.
development
Health-check the LLM Wiki. Reports orphan pages, contradictions, stale claims, broken internal links, missing index/log coverage, structure-manifest violations, and secret/tenant leaks. Use periodically or before hardening a wiki. Read-only — it reports findings, it does not fix them.
testing
Ingest source material into the LLM Wiki. With an argument (URL, file path, or prompt) it ingests that one source; with no argument it runs a full ingest across every enabled non-external-write source. Routes to the right connector, then runs the ordered pipeline (source note → synthesis → index → log → verify → state → commit/PR). Use whenever new knowledge should enter the wiki.