claude-code-community-ireland/quality-standards

Quality Standards Reference

This skill defines the quality gates, scoring criteria, and acceptance standards that all designs must meet.

Quality Gates (95% MINIMUM)

All gates must pass for design completion:

| Gate | Threshold | Weight | Mandatory | |------|-----------|--------|-----------| | Minimum Iterations | >= 5 | - | Yes | | Maximum Iterations | <= 20 | - | Yes | | Overall Score | >= 9.5/10 (95%) | - | Yes | | WCAG AA Compliance | 100% | - | Yes | | Vibe-Code Probability | < 1% | - | Yes | | Critical Issues | 0 | - | Yes | | Spatial Score | >= 9.0/10 | 25% | Yes | | Color Score | >= 9.0/10 | 25% | Yes | | Typography Score | >= 9.0/10 | 25% | Yes | | Originality Score | >= 9.5/10 | 25% | Yes |

Scoring Rubrics

Spatial Design (0-10)

| Score | Description | |-------|-------------| | 9-10 | Perfect grid adherence, masterful spacing relationships, balanced composition | | 7-8 | Consistent grid usage, good spacing, minor alignment issues | | 5-6 | Some grid violations, inconsistent spacing, noticeable balance issues | | 3-4 | Frequent off-grid values, poor spacing relationships, unbalanced | | 1-2 | No grid system, chaotic spacing, severely unbalanced |

Key Checkpoints:

• [ ] All spacing values on 8pt grid (or 4pt for micro)
• [ ] Consistent spacing between similar elements
• [ ] Logical spacing hierarchy (related closer, unrelated farther)
• [ ] Proper alignment to grid columns
• [ ] Balanced visual weight distribution
• [ ] Effective use of whitespace

Color Design (0-10)

| Score | Description | |-------|-------------| | 9-10 | WCAG AAA, harmonious palette, strong emotional alignment, unique | | 7-8 | WCAG AA, cohesive colors, appropriate mood, some customization | | 5-6 | Minor contrast issues, acceptable harmony, generic choices | | 3-4 | WCAG failures, clashing colors, wrong emotional tone | | 1-2 | Multiple accessibility failures, no coherent palette |

Key Checkpoints:

• [ ] All text/background combinations meet WCAG AA (4.5:1)
• [ ] UI components meet 3:1 contrast
• [ ] Color palette is harmonious (defined relationship)
• [ ] Colors evoke intended emotional response
• [ ] Colors are appropriate for sector
• [ ] Palette is not generic/default framework colors

Typography (0-10)

| Score | Description | |-------|-------------| | 9-10 | Perfect hierarchy, excellent readability, intentional pairing, flawless implementation | | 7-8 | Clear hierarchy, good readability, appropriate fonts, minor issues | | 5-6 | Adequate hierarchy, acceptable readability, basic font choices | | 3-4 | Unclear hierarchy, readability issues, poor font choices | | 1-2 | No hierarchy, unreadable, inappropriate fonts |

Key Checkpoints:

• [ ] Clear visual hierarchy (size, weight, color)
• [ ] Font pairing is intentional and complementary
• [ ] Line length 50-75 characters
• [ ] Line height appropriate (1.4-1.6 for body)
• [ ] Minimum 16px for body text
• [ ] Consistent usage across similar elements
• [ ] Proper CSS implementation (rem, variables)

Originality (0-10)

| Score | Description | |-------|-------------| | 9-10 | Highly unique, no generic patterns, strong brand personality | | 7-8 | Mostly original, minimal generic patterns, some personality | | 5-6 | Some customization, recognizable generic patterns | | 3-4 | Mostly generic, obvious AI patterns, no personality | | 1-2 | Pure vibe-code, all defaults, completely generic |

Key Checkpoints:

• [ ] No generic gradients (purple-blue, etc.)
• [ ] Layout patterns customized from stock
• [ ] Framework defaults modified
• [ ] Decorative elements are purposeful
• [ ] Real content (not placeholder)
• [ ] Distinct brand personality present

WCAG 2.1 Checklist

Level A (Must Pass)

| Criterion | Description | Check | |-----------|-------------|-------| | 1.1.1 | Non-text content has alt text | Images, icons | | 1.3.1 | Info and relationships in markup | Semantic HTML | | 1.3.2 | Meaningful sequence | DOM order matches visual | | 1.4.1 | Color not sole indicator | Don't rely on color alone | | 2.1.1 | Keyboard accessible | All functionality via keyboard | | 2.1.2 | No keyboard trap | Can tab away from all elements | | 2.4.1 | Bypass blocks | Skip links present | | 2.4.2 | Page titled | Descriptive title | | 2.4.4 | Link purpose clear | From link text or context | | 3.1.1 | Language of page | lang attribute on html | | 4.1.1 | Valid markup | No parsing errors | | 4.1.2 | Name, role, value | ARIA where needed |

Level AA (Should Pass)

| Criterion | Description | Check | |-----------|-------------|-------| | 1.4.3 | Contrast minimum | 4.5:1 normal, 3:1 large | | 1.4.4 | Resize text | Works at 200% zoom | | 1.4.5 | Images of text | Avoid, use real text | | 2.4.6 | Headings descriptive | Clear, meaningful | | 2.4.7 | Focus visible | Clear focus indicators | | 3.2.3 | Consistent navigation | Same order throughout | | 3.2.4 | Consistent identification | Same function = same name |

Level AAA (Recommended)

| Criterion | Description | Check | |-----------|-------------|-------| | 1.4.6 | Enhanced contrast | 7:1 normal, 4.5:1 large | | 1.4.8 | Visual presentation | Line length, spacing | | 2.4.9 | Link purpose alone | Clear from link text only |

Issue Classification

Critical (Blocks Deployment)

• WCAG Level A failures
• Color contrast below 3:1
• Broken core functionality
• Unreadable text
• Keyboard traps
• Missing skip links

High Priority (Fix Before Launch)

• WCAG Level AA failures
• Color contrast 3:1-4.5:1 (below AA)
• Significant layout issues
• Poor visual hierarchy
• Major spacing inconsistencies
• No focus indicators

Medium Priority (Fix Soon)

• Minor spacing issues
• Suboptimal color choices
• Typography tweaks
• Enhancement opportunities
• WCAG AAA suggestions

Low Priority (Nice to Have)

• Micro-interaction polish
• Animation refinements
• Advanced accessibility features
• Performance optimizations

Iteration Strategy

Explore Phase (Iterations 1-5)

• Try bold, different approaches
• Don't optimize prematurely
• Focus on overall direction
• MUST complete all 5 iterations even if gates pass early
• Use early passing to polish and exceed thresholds

Exploit Phase (Iterations 6-12)

• Refine the best approach
• Fix specific issues identified
• Optimize for quality gates
• Polish and perfect

Pivot Phase (Iterations 13-20)

• If stuck, try completely different direction
• Re-run research with new direction
• Reset assumptions
• Challenge previous decisions
• Consider alternative approaches

Score Calculation

Overall Score = (Spatial × 0.25) + (Color × 0.25) +
                (Typography × 0.25) + (Originality × 0.25)

Pass Criteria:
- Minimum iterations >= 5
- Overall >= 9.5 (95%)
- All dimensions >= 9.0
- Originality >= 9.5
- Vibe-code probability < 1%
- Critical issues = 0
- WCAG AA = 100%

Failure Patterns

Score Plateau

Detection: No improvement for 2+ iterations Action: Switch to Pivot strategy, try different approach

Recurring Issues

Detection: Same issues appear after "fixing" Action: Address root cause, not symptoms

Regression

Detection: Scores decreasing Action: Revert to previous best, analyze what broke

Dimension Imbalance

Detection: One dimension consistently low Action: Focused iteration on weak dimension