skills/legal/record-designation/SKILL.md
Drafts a Record Designation on Appeal identifying trial court materials for transmission to the appellate court. Covers appellant designations and appellee counter-designations with transcript requests, exhibit lists, cost allocation, and compliance guidance. Use when filing a designation of record, counter-designation, transcript designation, or preparing the appellate record after a notice of appeal.
npx skillsauth add casemark/skills record-designationInstall this skill globally with one command. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Windsurf.
3 of 9 scanners reported clean
Some scanners were skipped, did not run, or reported a non-clean status. Review each row below.
Drafts a designation identifying all trial court materials to be transmitted to the appellate court, organized for completeness against each appellate issue.
| Element | Requirement | |---|---| | Court | Full appellate court name | | Case numbers | Appellate case no. + trial court case no. | | Parties | Full names with appellate designations (Appellant/Appellee or Petitioner/Respondent) | | Title | "Designation of Record on Appeal" or jurisdiction-specific variant |
Choose based on case complexity:
For each item: exact docket title, filing date, docket entry number.
For each challenged ruling, designate the complete motion package:
| Component | Details | |---|---| | Motion | Title, filing date, docket no. | | Supporting briefs | All opposition and reply briefs | | Declarations/affidavits | Each declarant identified | | Documentary evidence | Attached or filed in support | | Hearing transcript | Date and subject | | Written order | Granting/denying |
Format each designation:
Transcript of [Proceeding Type] held on [Date],
before Judge [Name], regarding [Subject Matter].
[If partial]: Limited to: (1) testimony of [Witness];
(2) sidebar conference at p. [X] regarding Exhibit [Y];
(3) [other specific portions].
Identify by: date, proceeding type, judge, subject matter, witnesses, exhibit discussions. Err toward completeness — omitted portions cannot be reviewed on appeal.
Format each entry:
[Party]'s Exhibit [No.]: [Description], dated [Date] — [Admitted/Excluded/Limited Purpose]
When drafting a counter-designation, also include:
| Component | Requirement | |---|---| | Cost allocation | Appellant acknowledges preparation/transmission costs; appellee addresses costs for counter-designated additions | | Certification | Accuracy and completeness after reasonable inquiry | | Certificate of service | All parties, trial court clerk, court reporters per local rules | | Signature block | Counsel name, bar number, firm, address, phone, email |
development
name: automated-contract-summary language: en description: Generates structured executive summaries of contracts using ML — captures key terms, party obligations, risk allocations, and compliance requirements in a standardized format. Optimized for high-volume review where speed and consistency matter. tags: - summarization - agreement - corporate --- # Automated Contract Summarization Produces standardized executive summaries of contracts using machine learning, capturing essential term
tools
Extracts regulatory obligations from dense regulations across jurisdictions. Breaks down multi-level regulations into clear article-level obligations, classifies applicability to a business, and prioritizes by risk level. Use when translating regulations into actionable compliance requirements.
development
Continuously monitors regulatory landscapes for changes relevant to a specific business. Ingests global regulatory updates, filters by relevance, summarizes impact, and produces an actionable change advisory. Use when tracking regulatory developments affecting a particular product or market.
testing
Compares an organization's existing compliance controls, policies, and procedures against extracted regulatory obligations to identify coverage gaps. Produces a remediation plan with prioritized actions. Use when assessing compliance maturity or preparing for regulatory audits.